The important question would I suppose be what does RPM/Yum do with them...
I've a nasty feeling it uses lapack by default, but will use atlas for
dep solving if it's already installed.
Mark
On 12/03/2010, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Mark Chappell
<tremble(a)tremble.org.uk>
wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> Ok if my cave man hacking attempts were correct then this is the list
>> of things that in EPEL beats EL-5 stuff:
>>
>> Looking up all competing providers
>> Got all the potential problems, checking them
>> ==================================================================
>> lapack-devel-3.0-37.el5.x86_64 requires liblapack.so.3()(64bit)
>> epel wins with atlas
>> atlas - epel
>> lapack - el5
>
>
> That liblapack.so.3 is tucked away in /usr/lib64/atlas/ and isn't on the
> library path by default IIRC.
What I did was compare the list of provides with the list of requires.
One package requires liblapack and another says it provides it. My
compare routine may need some work to make it better :).
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list