[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL8 and EPEL7: Introduce %py3_check_import - review needed

[Miro Hrončok]

On 03. 08. 21 2:10, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>  On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:55:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import
> > to EPEL8 and EPEL7:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/31
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/32
> >
> > So far, there has been no response. Is there anybody willing to merge them?
> > They are manually tested, as indicated in the comments.
> >
> > When we introduce new macros to Fedora, I strive to backport them to EPELs
> > if possible, so package maintainers don't need to think "may I use
> this?" if
> > they desire EPEL compatibility. However, I don't want to merge my own pull
> > requests to epel-rpm-macros (unless they are urgent bug fixes).
>  
>  I can merge them... 
Thank you! Both updates now exist:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-dfd462a782
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e3b1cc2b6e

> > A meta question: Should the epel-sig group co-maintain the
> package?
>  
>  They could if desired. 
I think it is desired. Why wouldn't it be?

-- 
Miro Hrončok
-- 
Phone: [phone]
IRC: mhroncok