On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 13:08 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:46 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@serjux.com> wrote:

On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 11:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > This update changes a library soname, which makes it an
> > incompatible
> > upgrade.  It must follow the EPEL incompatible upgrades policy [0].
> > This email can count as step 1 once you reply with the specific
> > CVEs
> > this will address.  Then it must be open for discussion on list for
> > one week (step 2) before being added as an agenda item at next
> > week's
> > EPEL Steering Committee meeting [1] (step 3).
> >
> > [0]
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/
> > [1] https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/epel/#m9854
>
> OK , thank you

Hi,
have we any new ?

I'd like move on before rhel 8.6 be available .

Thank you 

Hi Sérgio,

Could you list the CVE's that this update addresses.

If that list is fairly long, at least the important ones

we got 82 reported on bugzilla 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&classification=Fedora&component=ImageMagick&list_id=12543908&product=Fedora%20EPEL&query_format=advanced