On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:32 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:15 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 19. 11. 21 17:54, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:46 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com
> > > <mailto:smooge@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com
> > > <mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello EPEL people,
> > > >
> > > > what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit
to 3 days for
> > > > EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes
> > > should have a small stable limit. 3 days sounds about right.
> > >
> > >
> > > +1
> >
> > There seem to be a consensus, do I file a ticket at infra, or does the EPSCo
> > need to approve it a meeting?
> >
>
> Please file a ticket with infra about it.
wow... consensus in 1.5 hours. :)
Perhaps this should be discussed at the next meeting? To allow
interested parties to actually see it and comment?
Anyhow, I'm personally fine with it, but note that 3 days leaves very
little time for testing. One of those days is likely mirror sync/getting
the update, so interested testers would need to update at least every
day to make sure and not miss out.
Considering the state of CentOS Stream 9 and RHEL 9 right now, I'm
inclined to consider it at the same stage as branched Fedora. We can
always raise it later if we want.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!