On 25 March 2016 at 10:46, Dave Love <d.love(a)liverpool.ac.uk> wrote:
Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> writes:
> And I just pulled two random package with EL6 branches, changed %doc to
> %license in the appropriate places, and built them in mock. Everything
> came out as expected (no build failures, and the license files are in
> with the rest of the documentation).
> So I unfortunately have no idea what might be going wrong for you.
> - J<
In preparing the recipe with the minimal spec to demonstrate, I realized
it's because it doesn't work if you have scl build stuff installed. I
wonder if it would be better -- at least more obvious! -- to have it
conflict with the scl macros package.
Will the scl bug mentioned not be fixed?
What bug? Sorry we really need to see some actual output and problems
here to have an idea of what we are trying to tackle.
epel-devel mailing list
Stephen J Smoogen.