My organization handles all software deployments to our several dozen production systems
through yum; whether it is in-house or third party software. It greatly eases update
management for us.
We are seriously considering using Catalyst for a new webapp we will be developing soon
and we want to be able to deploy it using the same mechanisms as all our other software.
We could use CPAN, and we are prepared to go that route if we need to, but we would prefer
to keep everything in RPMs. There are actually several deployment strategies I am
investigating right now, this is just one of them.
On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Edward Trochim elucidated thus:
> Hello all,
>
> Are there plans to bring the perl Catalyst framework to EPEL 6? The
> runtime and many of the plugins are already in Fedora 12. I am
> interested in providing any help that is needed; however, I have
> never created any packages for either Fedora or EPEL.
Is there a preference to not simply install it from CPAN? That would be
my choice: the packages would stay much more up to date, vs. the EPEL
update cycle.
Just wondering.
j
--
Joshua Kugler
Part-Time System Admin/Programmer
http://www.eeinternet.com - Fairbanks, AK
PGP Key:
http://pgp.mit.edu/ ID 0x73B13B6A
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list