Re: FTBFS in mock but not a real EL5 system
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:40:43 -0700
"T.C. Hollingsworth" <tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Node.js upstream recently switched from hardcoding LINUX_VERSION_CODE
> to checking that __NR_accept4 is defined when checking that the
> "accept4" syscall is available. (see patch here [1])
>
> This breaks building for EL5 in mock on F16 (see log tail here [2]),
> but not on a real CentOS 5 system. A quick grep of
> $MOCK_ROOT/usr/include indicates that __NR_accept4 isn't defined, as
> it should be, so I'm not sure what's going wrong here, or if it's a
> problem in mock or upstream.
Well, if something fails in mock, but works on a real system it sounds
like missing BuildRequires. Perhaps kernel-headers?
Thanks, I'll try that.
In any case, not sure what this has to do with EPEL... we don't
ship
Node.js. ;)
Not yet, anyway. ;-)
Sorry, I couldn't think of a better place to ask about EL5 mock issues.
-T.C.