Daniel Riek wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 17:01 +0200, Joel Andres Granados wrote:
Question: was the fact that python-imaging got introduced to RHELClient and not Server a conscious determination or was it a mistake? if it was a conscious determination, what are the policies that dictate when and how this occurs? and where can they be found?
I think it was a side effect of the decision to move whatever required it to the Client but not the core Server (need to review that). There is no publicly available policy document on this, but in general packages that are pulled in by another package, move to the repository of that other package. It also was a mistake because I could have forseen that sofware wants to use it.
Regards,
I'm the maintainer in RHEL for this package. do I need some special considerations or do I just rebuild for 5.1? thx.
Daniel
epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list