On Sat, 10 Aug 2019, Richard Grainger wrote:
> On 10 Aug 2019, at 20:23, Miro HronÄok
<mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> While I really tried to do my best, it seems that I broke CentOS by
> retiring python36. Should it be unretired? Or is it reasonable to
> say: Please wait for CentOS 7.7?
This is why I believe we need a âCentOS-EPELâ repo that mirrors EPEL
generally, but that is frozen in the period between a RHEL and
CentOS release.
The same could be said for a Scientific-Linux-EPEL.
Would it be clearer to have an EPEL7.6 and an EPEL7.7 ?
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
andrew(a)aitchison.me.uk