A qua, 27-04-2022 às 16:58 -0700, Troy Dawson escreveu:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 4:38 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 23:44 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 17:54 -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > > > > This was approved [0] in today's EPEL Steering Committee
> > meeting.
> > > > > Please continue with the process for incompatible upgrades
> > from
> > > > > step 4
> > > > > forward [1].
> > > > >
> > > > > [0]
> > > > >
> >
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/epel/epel.2022-04-13-20.00.html
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> >
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrad...
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carl George
> > > >
> > > > Based on repoquery it looks like only three packages need to
> > be
> > > > rebuilt for this.
> > > >
> > > > converseen
> > > > digikam
> > > > dvdauthor
> > >
> > > Correct the other packages "just" use Imageagick tools , I need
> > to
> > > check
> > > also packages that use perl(ImageMagick)
> > >
> > > I'm going start now !
> >
> > digikam is updated in epel8-next , I'm doing a side-tag in epel8
> > .
> >
> > This case brings one question , the packages of epel8-next will
> > be
> > branch to epel8 ?
> > The way I see it is rhel 8.5 + epel 8 and centos stream 8 + epel
> > 8 next
> > , rhel 8.6 is branched from centos stream 8 and epel 8 should
> > also be
> > branched from epel 8 next . This implies that packages on epel 8
> > must
> > have lower versions than epel 8 next .
> >
> >
> > what I should do with digikam ?
> >
>
>
> The version in digikam epel8 and epel8-next are different. The
> reason is because of a package update (opencr) that is currently in
> CentOS Stream 8 that won't make it into RHEL 8 until RHEL 8.6.
> For the epel8 version, just do a bump and build like you have the
> other packages on your list, keeping it's version the same.
> I can do the epel8-next rebuild after you are done. And when RHEL
> 8.6 is released, I'll be bringing the higher version that is in
> epel8-next, over to epel8.
Notification time stamped 2022-04-28 00:48:53 UTC
sergiomb's digikam-6.4.0-5.el8 failed to build
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1957109
:(
BTW if someone want to fix it, please built it in the side-tag epel8-
build-side-52356
fedpkg build --target=epel8-build-side-52356
> Troy
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> epel-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproj...
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
epel-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedor
aproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Sérgio M. B.