On 02/08/10 15:58, Mark Chappell wrote:
Iain Arnell wrote:
> The rpm is there, but it's no longer referenced in the latest
> primary.xml. It seems to have been in the original beta2, but not in
> the latest refresh. In fact, it looks like the beta2-refresh (why not
> beta3?) was prepared and createrepo'd elsewhere and simply copied over
> the top of the existing beta directory leaving a whole bunch of
> orphaned rpms.
Indeed, a branch request is in...
Apparently it was deliberate to do this, grumbles have been sent in the
Do you have a BZ number for the branch request?