On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 05:47:36PM -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> Well I would like to have it that it actually has bodhi votes before
> it can be moved. We can have a process for the number of votes needed,
> but I would rather have something getting a couple of +1's that can be
> tracked than a 1 month timeframe and no one looking at it.
What about packages that don't get wide exposure? Are they to be
forever barred from EPEL (they would be under this proposal)?
Yep, shoot.. I'd say most of my Fedora packages are niche enough that
the users that do exist certainly know nothing of bodhi nor of how to
give my update karma. :)
Even fewer on the EPEL front.
We'd all just be bugging each other to vote for our own updates :)