Thanks a lot for the helpful answer. I will request the fuse3 repo or
get the current fuse maintainer to do it.
Dave
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:33:37PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "DD" == David Dykstra <dwd(a)fnal.gov> writes:
>
> DD> Does this also imply a new fuse3 package in pagure & bodhi? Or
> DD> could it still be part of the fuse package but have a separate
> DD> fuse3.spec?
>
> It would have to be a separate package repository and receive separate
> updates. It is not possible for a source package in EPEL to have the
> same name as a source package in RHEL, even if the build products
> (binary RPMs) have different names.
>
> Note that a package review is not required to create a package
> repository named "fuse3" (or "fuse3.7" or whatever) when the
"fuse"
> package repository already exists. See
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuideline...
> When running fedpkg request-repo, use the --exception flag.
>
> - J<