On 02/08/10 16:02, Mark Chappell wrote:
Mark Chappell wrote:
> Iain Arnell wrote:
>> The rpm is there, but it's no longer referenced in the latest
>> primary.xml. It seems to have been in the original beta2, but not in
>> the latest refresh. In fact, it looks like the beta2-refresh (why not
>> beta3?) was prepared and createrepo'd elsewhere and simply copied over
>> the top of the existing beta directory leaving a whole bunch of
>> orphaned rpms.
>
> Indeed, a branch request is in.
Or not, It's perl-MIME-Types I requested....
OK, I raised it as
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620459
Paul.