-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 06/26/2014 11:07 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:41:32 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen
> On 25 June 2014 09:28, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:23:24 -0700 Jeff Sheltren
>> <jeff(a)tag1consulting.com> wrote:
>>> Awesome, thanks!
>>> Is there a plan/schedule for getting epel-7 builds into the
>>> normal git/koji/bodhi workflow? Is that waiting on a CentOS
>>> release, or are there other issues?
>> Well, at least centos release... but additionally:
>> * We should decide what to do with packages in the beta that
>> have broken deps. I'm thinking we untag them so they don't go
>> out at all and maintainers need to retag them or rebuild them
>> when deps are met and push them via bodhi.
> I figure we would rebuild all of the EPEL beta and consider all
> broken deps and such FTBFS.
I'm not sure there's any need to do a mass rebuild, but I could be
wrong. Anything that has broken deps might need a rebuild, but the
maintainer could just take care of those?
If packages were built against the rc, they're probably fine. There
were only around 50 or so packages that changed between final and the
rc I believe...
If things were built against the beta (and I believe many were)
there's a fair bit of change and a mass rebuild would probably be a
good idea. Does a mass rebuild cost anything more than time to execute?
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----