EPEL rhel7 final content

[Kevin Fenzi]

We've switched over to using the final rhel7 content finally. 

Sorry for the delay. 

As you can see from the epel7 build tag in koji: 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=259

we have the following rhel7 channels that we are building against and
will not conflict with: 

rhel7-server 
rhel7-rhel-extras 
rhel7-server-ha 
rhel7-server-optional 

Hopefully we can get the wiki page with package contents updated soon. 

Thanks, 

kevin

[Jeff Sheltren]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:

>  We've switched over to using the final rhel7 content finally.
>
>  Sorry for the delay.
>
>  As you can see from the epel7 build tag in koji:
>  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=259
>
>  we have the following rhel7 channels that we are building against and
>  will not conflict with:
>
>  rhel7-server
>  rhel7-rhel-extras
>  rhel7-server-ha
>  rhel7-server-optional
>
>  Hopefully we can get the wiki page with package contents updated soon.
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  kevin
>
>  
Awesome, thanks!

Is there a plan/schedule for getting epel-7 builds into the normal
git/koji/bodhi workflow?  Is that waiting on a CentOS release, or are there
other issues?

-Jeff

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:23:24 -0700
Jeff Sheltren <jeff(a)tag1consulting.com&gt; wrote:

>  Awesome, thanks!
>  
>  Is there a plan/schedule for getting epel-7 builds into the normal
>  git/koji/bodhi workflow?  Is that waiting on a CentOS release, or are
>  there other issues? 
Well, at least centos release... but additionally: 

* We should decide what to do with packages in the beta that have
  broken deps. I'm thinking we untag them so they don't go out at all
  and maintainers need to retag them or rebuild them when deps are met
  and push them via bodhi. 

* Are there any other larger stacks of packages that maintainers are
  planning on landing? Those would be good to do before leaving beta,
  but I don't know of any off hand. (well, aside the xfce packages that
  are branched and I need to find time to build and test). 

* We might want to write up some press around moving to normal epel7.
  Press release, announcement, etc. 

kevin

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 25 June 2014 09:28, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:

>  On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:23:24 -0700
>  Jeff Sheltren <jeff(a)tag1consulting.com&gt; wrote:
>
>  > Awesome, thanks!
>  >
>  > Is there a plan/schedule for getting epel-7 builds into the normal
>  > git/koji/bodhi workflow?  Is that waiting on a CentOS release, or are
>  > there other issues?
>
>  Well, at least centos release... but additionally:
>
>  * We should decide what to do with packages in the beta that have
>    broken deps. I'm thinking we untag them so they don't go out at all
>    and maintainers need to retag them or rebuild them when deps are met
>    and push them via bodhi.
>
>  
I figure we would rebuild all of the EPEL beta and consider all broken deps
and such FTBFS.



>  * Are there any other larger stacks of packages that maintainers are
>    planning on landing? Those would be good to do before leaving beta,
>    but I don't know of any off hand. (well, aside the xfce packages that
>    are branched and I need to find time to build and test).
>
>  
I will help on this next week. I have to rebuild a box for desktop testing
of all alternative desktop stacks.


>  * We might want to write up some press around moving to normal
> epel7.
>    Press release, announcement, etc.
>
>  kevin
>
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  epel-devel mailing list
>  epel-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
>
>  

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:41:32 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  On 25 June 2014 09:28, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:
>  
>  > On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:23:24 -0700
>  > Jeff Sheltren <jeff(a)tag1consulting.com&gt; wrote:
>  >
>  > > Awesome, thanks!
>  > >
>  > > Is there a plan/schedule for getting epel-7 builds into the normal
>  > > git/koji/bodhi workflow?  Is that waiting on a CentOS release, or
>  > > are there other issues?
>  >
>  > Well, at least centos release... but additionally:
>  >
>  > * We should decide what to do with packages in the beta that have
>  >   broken deps. I'm thinking we untag them so they don't go out at
>  > all and maintainers need to retag them or rebuild them when deps
>  > are met and push them via bodhi.
>  >
>  >
>  
>  I figure we would rebuild all of the EPEL beta and consider all
>  broken deps and such FTBFS. 
I'm not sure there's any need to do a mass rebuild, but I could be
wrong. Anything that has broken deps might need a rebuild, but the
maintainer could just take care of those?

kevin

[Jim Perrin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 06/26/2014 11:07 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>  On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:41:32 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen
>  <smooge(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  
> > On 25 June 2014 09:28, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:
> > 
> >> On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:23:24 -0700 Jeff Sheltren
> >> <jeff(a)tag1consulting.com&gt; wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Awesome, thanks!
> >>> 
> >>> Is there a plan/schedule for getting epel-7 builds into the
> >>> normal git/koji/bodhi workflow?  Is that waiting on a CentOS
> >>> release, or are there other issues?
> >> 
> >> Well, at least centos release... but additionally:
> >> 
> >> * We should decide what to do with packages in the beta that
> >> have broken deps. I'm thinking we untag them so they don't go
> >> out at all and maintainers need to retag them or rebuild them
> >> when deps are met and push them via bodhi.
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > I figure we would rebuild all of the EPEL beta and consider all 
> > broken deps and such FTBFS.
>  
>  I'm not sure there's any need to do a mass rebuild, but I could be 
>  wrong. Anything that has broken deps might need a rebuild, but the 
>  maintainer could just take care of those? 

If packages were built against the rc, they're probably fine. There
were only around 50 or so packages that changed between final and the
rc I believe...

If things were built against the beta (and I believe many were)
there's a fair bit of change and a mass rebuild would probably be a
good idea. Does a mass rebuild cost anything more than time to execute?



- -- 
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTrExTAAoJEBbHyC76Ca13mCsP/ixQysHT3WLhmmLe3yDCiQhc
> Yk4370XJLxiNLXIUAecqmHFAHqyXESW3ftgq24QqR+e/RUMVSGEgNJ1pg1z6Sh1T
> SI/PBcK/jNpbFK31hF/1ef4K8+ZEXp9cROHfKDINdCLQmEtOSAnKZQl8TlIQwEvt
> 3AKH3lSaGhUqCTMypg8Ts5Ntn0WpRki5LsSVUOPF2/IfLVEmX60WZqq1IPhu/oKR
> +bVARdt9FC1Nu3QGXQjO3sbMMoecdlGdr4PUkSL7g7unSgUyccgXBKwo9RafFjXe
> oxvOY4xg6aUqboGvxLhQWm8DGQHfTOrMgro+ES7Co8x2B/LB2wd0gxDqY8wHhIMh
> Ab5BZyTr4cvClRZTbKBhoRXWTLxlPeKwYBlNBhJPJYP09yqe/MSQJ36TStfucGqi
> Zy9APQQX5NcXeYqdPcbFt8qESQRVryapMjx9FGwIs0jr6rEJAwpgmzKyftJPJbs4
> rP7c4KCifVfYTX9AW4NFPSe2IqYWxbci5cFP8qtqq+L2xb9fiZGkGOvlCp5BoHRO
> 93PgvNHpRYd+vEHSDo/dpugCp0q8zcs0xKmrfA0rJvauuD3aZ4PhmrW1/hB9K2za
> i+7xuZnxQ7uS21wYLWsdRDxuT6i/79hYIkxCu9yxfjMABJwH5gEaVbuoKBP8genw
> 6mM8onlq3DjadMnALV4X
> =CfJj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Till Maas]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:18:34AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

>  Hopefully we can get the wiki page with package contents updated
> soon.  
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/epel7 is now updated. There is no
notation yet, which tells from which channel the package is coming.

Regards
Till