Packages for EL-6 (or lack thereof)

[Mark Chappell]

Subsequent to the last EPEL meeting I've tried to pull out some info on
which packages have and have not been built so far...

Note: Originally there was no plan for an automated mass re-build

Out of almost 3500 packages, about 500 have been built.

A list of what's been built or not, who's packages haven't been built
and what the latest builds are can be found at:

http://tremble.fedorapeople.org/EPEL-Report

The top 10 for unbuilt packages:

spot : 197
lkundrak : 153
steve : 141
orphan : 126
thias : 88
rdieter : 80
lmacken : 67
rjones : 62
xulchris : 59
kwizart : 56

The 10 ten for packages built:

ellert : 54
tremble : 50
remi : 49
robert : 43
ausil : 42
pghmcfc : 41
peter : 38
stevetraylen : 27
itamarjp : 25
sharkcz : 21

Mark

[Michael Stahnke]

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Mark Chappell  wrote:
> Subsequent to the last EPEL meeting I've tried to pull out some info on
> which packages have and have not been built so far...
>
> Note: Originally there was no plan for an automated mass re-build
>
> Out of almost 3500 packages, about 500 have been built.
>
> A list of what's been built or not, who's packages haven't been built
> and what the latest builds are can be found at:
>
> http://tremble.fedorapeople.org/EPEL-Report
>
> The top 10 for unbuilt packages:
>
> spot : 197
> lkundrak : 153
> steve : 141
> orphan : 126
> thias : 88
> rdieter : 80
> lmacken : 67
> rjones : 62
> xulchris : 59
> kwizart : 56
>
> The 10 ten for packages built:
>
> ellert : 54
> tremble : 50
> remi : 49
> robert : 43
> ausil : 42
> pghmcfc : 41
> peter : 38
> stevetraylen : 27
> itamarjp : 25
> sharkcz : 21
>
> Mark
>
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

Some of the packages on your list were pulled into core RHEL.  I know
rails and it's deps were.  Thus, I have not built them for EPEL-6.

stahnma

[Mark Chappell]

Michael Stahnke wrote:
> Some of the packages on your list were pulled into core RHEL.  I know
> rails and it's deps were.  Thus, I have not built them for EPEL-6.

Bah, I'll attempt to tweak the script.

Mark

[Mark Chappell]

Michael Stahnke wrote:
> Some of the packages on your list were pulled into core RHEL.  I know
> rails and it's deps were.  Thus, I have not built them for EPEL-6.

Okay, the list's been reduced to only those listed in pkgdb for EL-6

Caveat, some stuff got branched even though it's made it into RHEL-6...

Mark

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Monday, June 21, 2010 10:12:22 am Mark Chappell wrote:
> Michael Stahnke wrote:
> > Some of the packages on your list were pulled into core RHEL.  I know
> > rails and it's deps were.  Thus, I have not built them for EPEL-6.
>
> Okay, the list's been reduced to only those listed in pkgdb for EL-6
>
> Caveat, some stuff got branched even though it's made it into RHEL-6...

things in rhel at beta1 did not get branched,  But ive seen packages that have 
been obsoleted etc that got branched because the maintainer did not put a 
nobranch file in cvs.

Once Beta2 and GA happen we will have to review what is branched and 
block/branch accordingly

Dennis