On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:20:49 -0700
Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com> wrote:
On 12/13/2010 11:04 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/13/2010 09:24 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:47:54 -0700
>> Orion Poplawski<orion(a)cora.nwra.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ah, I didn't catch the multilib aspect (32-bit missing on x86_64).
>>> So, this needs to be fixed in the EPEL multilib compose?
>>
>> It can't be. It's the way it is in the rhel repos. We could copy
>> and re-create the rhel repos, but thats not something I think we
>> want to do.
>>
>> kevin
>
> What I meant was - could we exclude items that require
> gcc-gfortran(x86-32) from the EPEL x86_64 repos?
>
Does anyone know how I/we can fix this?
Drop the Requires: gcc-gfortran%{_isa} and it will work.
Maybe someone should mention this in the guidelines; this won't work on
any Fedora or RHEL until x86_64 gfortran is made to provide
gcc-gfortran(x86-32)... [Although I don't know if 64-bit gfortran ran
with -m32 produces the same modules as 32-bit gfortran]
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola(a)fedoraproject.org