3:03 p.m.
I installed gftp on 1-20-13 on one system:
Jan 30 16:12:32 Installed: 2:gftp-2.0.19-4.el6.rf.i686
Now I go to get it for another system, and it is NOT THERE! ARGH!!!
<small font> help </small font> :)
3:05 p.m.
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I installed gftp on 1-20-13 on one system:
Jan 30 16:12:32 Installed: 2:gftp-2.0.19-4.el6.rf.i686
Now I go to get it for another system, and it is NOT THERE! ARGH!!!
<small font> help </small font> :)
rf means it came from rpmfusion, I think.
not from epel.
-sv
3:09 p.m.
On 02/12/2013 10:05 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I installed gftp on 1-20-13 on one system:
>
> Jan 30 16:12:32 Installed: 2:gftp-2.0.19-4.el6.rf.i686
>
> Now I go to get it for another system, and it is NOT THERE! ARGH!!!
>
> <small font> help </small font> :)
>
>
rf means it came from rpmfusion, I think.
not from epel.
Actually rf means it comes from repoforge:
http://pkgs.repoforge.org/gftp/gftp-2.0.19-4.el6.rf.i686.rpm
Regards,
Dennis
3:20 p.m.
On 02/12/2013 04:09 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 02/12/2013 10:05 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> I installed gftp on 1-20-13 on one system:
>>
>> Jan 30 16:12:32 Installed: 2:gftp-2.0.19-4.el6.rf.i686
>>
>> Now I go to get it for another system, and it is NOT THERE! ARGH!!!
>>
>> <small font> help </small font> :)
>>
>>
>
> rf means it came from rpmfusion, I think.
>
>
> not from epel.
Actually rf means it comes from repoforge:
http://pkgs.repoforge.org/gftp/gftp-2.0.19-4.el6.rf.i686.rpm
A double ARGH.
That means I did not save it to the 'right place' so I could move it
between systems to make building easier. I REALLY need to set up a local
repo with these odds and ends I seem to collect. This is what I used to
do years ago, and got out of the habbit as more and more of the specials
I needed became standard offerings.
thanks for straightening me out.
3:28 p.m.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm(a)htt-consult.com> wrote:
That means I did not save it to the 'right place' so I could
move it between
systems to make building easier. I REALLY need to set up a local repo with
these odds and ends I seem to collect. This is what I used to do years ago,
and got out of the habbit as more and more of the specials I needed became
standard offerings.
thanks for straightening me out.
Hi Robert,
Alternatively, you could always become the EPEL package maintainer.
Then you can let Fedora's release engineering manage the repo for you
:)
- Ken
3:37 p.m.
On 02/12/2013 10:28 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Robert Moskowitz
<rgm(a)htt-consult.com> wrote:
> That means I did not save it to the 'right place' so I could move it between
> systems to make building easier. I REALLY need to set up a local repo with
> these odds and ends I seem to collect. This is what I used to do years ago,
> and got out of the habbit as more and more of the specials I needed became
> standard offerings.
>
> thanks for straightening me out.
Hi Robert,
Alternatively, you could always become the EPEL package maintainer.
Then you can let Fedora's release engineering manage the repo for you
:)
Since the last release of gftp was in 2008 I would recommend switching to
e.g. filezilla which is available from EPEL. While the EPEL package doesn't
seem to be maintained anymore either at least upstream is still maintaining
the project and current builds are available for Fedora and can potentially
be rebuilt for EL6.
Regards,
Dennis
3:57 p.m.
On 02/12/2013 04:37 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 02/12/2013 10:28 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm(a)htt-consult.com> wrote:
>> That means I did not save it to the 'right place' so I could move it
between
>> systems to make building easier. I REALLY need to set up a local repo with
>> these odds and ends I seem to collect. This is what I used to do years ago,
>> and got out of the habbit as more and more of the specials I needed became
>> standard offerings.
>>
>> thanks for straightening me out.
> Hi Robert,
>
> Alternatively, you could always become the EPEL package maintainer.
> Then you can let Fedora's release engineering manage the repo for you
> :)
Since the last release of gftp was in 2008 I would recommend switching to
e.g. filezilla which is available from EPEL.
that would require teaching this old dog new tricks, and right now I
have enough new tricks to deal with. Perhaps around summertime ;)
While the EPEL package doesn't seem to be maintained anymore
either at least upstream is still maintaining
the project and current builds are available for Fedora and can potentially be rebuilt
for EL6.
Which has lots of other tools. Actually I ONLY use gftp for a GUI SCP
interface (or whatever it is doing under the covers when you select SSH!).
4084
days inactive
4084
days old
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn -
Ken Dreyer -
Robert Moskowitz -
Seth Vidal