epel8-playground target ignores build overrides?

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

My epel8 build for python-extras succeeded just fine (using 
python-testtools from a build override as a dependency - 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/python-testtools-2.4.0-3.el8), 
but the epel8-playground build claims python-testtools is not available:

epel8:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1499241

epel8-playground:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43889481

DEBUG util.py:600:  No matching package to install: 'python3-testtools'
DEBUG util.py:600:  Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:600:  Error: Some packages could not be found.

Does the playground setup not take overrides into account?

Thanks,

[Petr Pisar]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 09:22:56PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> My epel8 build for python-extras succeeded just fine (using python-testtools
> from a build override as a dependency -
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/python-testtools-2.4.0-3.el8), but
> the epel8-playground build claims python-testtools is not available:
>
> epel8:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1499241
>
> epel8-playground:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43889481
>
> DEBUG util.py:600:  No matching package to install: 'python3-testtools'
> DEBUG util.py:600:  Not all dependencies satisfied
> DEBUG util.py:600:  Error: Some packages could not be found.
>
> Does the playground setup not take overrides into account?

playground is an independent build target and thus overrides in epel8 and
epel8-playground are independent. But you don't need to create overrides in
epel8-playground because builds there appears in a build root automatically
on next repository regeneration.

However, your problem is not in overrides. Your problem is that
python-testtools package has never been successfully built for
epel8.playground:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11850

That's probably because of Carl George  deleted the
package.cfg configuration from epel8 branch to mirror the builds into
epel8-buildroot:

commit dd46fcc88a92241e2aa776208cf7ef0dddbab541
Author: Carl George 
Date:   Fri Apr 24 01:06:33 2020 -0500

Revert ""Adding package.cfg file""

This reverts commit 6a8c5775eb802cc8acfb93dfbe7e00d8e92a24a3.

-- Petr

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On 4/29/20 3:06 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> That's probably because of Carl George  deleted the
> package.cfg configuration from epel8 branch to mirror the builds into
> epel8-buildroot:
>
> commit dd46fcc88a92241e2aa776208cf7ef0dddbab541
> Author: Carl George 
> Date:   Fri Apr 24 01:06:33 2020 -0500
>  Revert ""Adding package.cfg file""
>
>  This reverts commit 6a8c5775eb802cc8acfb93dfbe7e00d8e92a24a3.

Ah indeed. Carl was trying to make it easier to merge changes from 
master and wanted to back out my diff that erroneously stripped the 
changelog, but package.cfg should probably stay there.

I'm restoring that commit.

Thanks,

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On 4/29/20 4:12 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On 4/29/20 3:06 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > That's probably because of Carl George  deleted the
> > package.cfg configuration from epel8 branch to mirror the builds into
> > epel8-buildroot:
> >
> > commit dd46fcc88a92241e2aa776208cf7ef0dddbab541
> > Author: Carl George 
> > Date:   Fri Apr 24 01:06:33 2020 -0500
> >
> > Revert ""Adding package.cfg file""
> >
> > This reverts commit 6a8c5775eb802cc8acfb93dfbe7e00d8e92a24a3.
>
> Ah indeed. Carl was trying to make it easier to merge changes from 
> master and wanted to back out my diff that erroneously stripped the 
> changelog, but package.cfg should probably stay there.
>
> I'm restoring that commit.

Digging deeper -- now python-testtools doesn't build in epel8-playground 
because python-testscenarios somehow is missing an epel8-playground 
branch. Oh joy.

I reissued `fedpkg request-branch` and that somehow generates *two* 
tickets and I had to close the epel8 one since the branch already 
exists. Hoping this works:

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/24661

Thanks,