Updated Build Roots to 5.1

[Mike McGrath]

I've updated the build roots to 5.1 and sent a test build through it 
seemed to work fine.  Please keep an eye out for any issues.

    -Mike

[Richard W.M. Jones]

Mike McGrath wrote:
>  I've updated the build roots to 5.1 and sent a test build through
> it 
>  seemed to work fine.  Please keep an eye out for any issues. 
I couldn't get this to work.

My package needs libvirt >= 0.2.1 which was distributed in RHEL 5.1 (but 
not RHEL 5 GA which used some older version of libvirt).

I just now tried a rebuild and encountered two problems.  Firstly all 
the builders except the ppc builder seem to be down:

$ plague-client list_builders

Builders:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   xenbuilder1.fedora.redhat.com           x86_64 amd64 ia32e noarch 
i386 i486 i586 i686 athlon     unavailable
   xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com               unavailable
   xenbuilder3.fedora.redhat.com               unavailable
   hammer2.fedora.redhat.com               x86_64 amd64 ia32e noarch 
i386 i486 i586 i686 athlon     unavailable
   ppc1.fedora.redhat.com                      unavailable
   ppc2.fedora.redhat.com                  ppc ppc32 noarch     alive
   ppc3.fedora.redhat.com                  ppc ppc32 noarch     alive

Secondly the build (on the ppc builder) failed, indicating that libvirt 
> = 0.2.1 isn't available: 
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37359-ocaml-libvirt-...
...
Cannot find build req  libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1. Exiting.

Rich.

-- 
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom.  Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:29:17 +0000
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  Secondly the build (on the ppc builder) failed, indicating that
>  libvirt 
>   >= 0.2.1 isn't available:  
>  
>
> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37359-ocaml-libvirt-...
>  ...
>  Cannot find build req  libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1. Exiting. 
Was libvirt even released on PPC for RHEL5* ?  I thought that was new
in Fedora land.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

[Richard W.M. Jones]

Jesse Keating wrote:
>  On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:29:17 +0000
>  "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  
> > Secondly the build (on the ppc builder) failed, indicating that
> > libvirt 
> >  >= 0.2.1 isn't available:  
> >
> >
> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37359-ocaml-libvirt-...
> > ...
> > Cannot find build req  libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1. Exiting.
>  
>  Was libvirt even released on PPC for RHEL5* ?  I thought that was new
>  in Fedora land. 
Now that the builders are fixed, I'm getting the exact same error on i386:

No Package Found for libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1
(from: 
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37397-ocaml-libvirt-...)

Is there something I have to do to make it use the build root from 5.1?

Rich.

-- 
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom.  Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903

[Michael Schwendt]

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:29:56 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:

>  Jesse Keating wrote:
>  > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:29:17 +0000
>  > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>  > 
>  >> Secondly the build (on the ppc builder) failed, indicating that
>  >> libvirt 
>  >>  >= 0.2.1 isn't available:  
>  >>
>  >>
> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37359-ocaml-libvirt-...
>  >> ...
>  >> Cannot find build req  libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1. Exiting.
>  > 
>  > Was libvirt even released on PPC for RHEL5* ?  I thought that was new
>  > in Fedora land.
>  
>  Now that the builders are fixed, I'm getting the exact same error on i386:
>  
>  No Package Found for libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1
>  (from: 
>
> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37397-ocaml-libvirt-...)
>  
>  Is there something I have to do to make it use the build root from 5.1? 
To me the RHEL5 repository, which is used by the builders, does not look
up-to-date. Only the old/original libvirt-devel-0.1.8-15.el5 is in there.

[Mike McGrath]

Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:29:56 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>    
> > Jesse Keating wrote:
> >     
> >> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:29:17 +0000
> >> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >>
> >>       
> >>> Secondly the build (on the ppc builder) failed, indicating that
> >>> libvirt 
> >>>  >= 0.2.1 isn't available:  
> >>>
> >>>
> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37359-ocaml-libvirt-...
> >>> ...
> >>> Cannot find build req  libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1. Exiting.
> >>>         
> >> Was libvirt even released on PPC for RHEL5* ?  I thought that was new
> >> in Fedora land.
> >>       
> > Now that the builders are fixed, I'm getting the exact same error on i386:
> >
> > No Package Found for libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1
> > (from: 
> >
> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37397-ocaml-libvirt-...)
> >
> > Is there something I have to do to make it use the build root from 5.1?
> >     
>
>  To me the RHEL5 repository, which is used by the builders, does not look
>  up-to-date. Only the old/original libvirt-devel-0.1.8-15.el5 is in there.
>     
You're correct, the new libvirt is indeed not in there.  I had only 
updated Client and Server repos.  I didn't realize we were also using 
the Cluster and VT repos, I'll update them now.

    -Mike

[Richard W.M. Jones]

Mike McGrath wrote:
>  You're correct, the new libvirt is indeed not in there.  I had
> only 
>  updated Client and Server repos.  I didn't realize we were also using 
>  the Cluster and VT repos, I'll update them now. 
This seems to be working on i386 & x86-64 now, thanks.

ppc is still missing out on libvirt for reasons unknown.  There's no 
problem compiling libvirt on ppc, and indeed we ship it on ppc in Fedora.

Rich.

-- 
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom.  Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903

[Mike McGrath]

Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>  Mike McGrath wrote:
> > You're correct, the new libvirt is indeed not in there.  I had only 
> > updated Client and Server repos.  I didn't realize we were also using 
> > the Cluster and VT repos, I'll update them now.
>
>  This seems to be working on i386 & x86-64 now, thanks.
>
>  ppc is still missing out on libvirt for reasons unknown.  There's no 
>  problem compiling libvirt on ppc, and indeed we ship it on ppc in Fedora. 
AFAIK libvirt does not ship with ppc RHEL.

    -Mike

[Jarod Wilson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mike McGrath wrote:
>  Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Mike McGrath wrote:
> >> You're correct, the new libvirt is indeed not in there.  I had only
> >> updated Client and Server repos.  I didn't realize we were also using
> >> the Cluster and VT repos, I'll update them now.
> >
> > This seems to be working on i386 & x86-64 now, thanks.
> >
> > ppc is still missing out on libvirt for reasons unknown.  There's no
> > problem compiling libvirt on ppc, and indeed we ship it on ppc in Fedora.
>  
>  AFAIK libvirt does not ship with ppc RHEL. 
...because the RHEL libvirt only supports xen and there is no ppc xen.

- --
Jarod Wilson
jwilson(a)redhat.com

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFHYAsctO+bni+75QMRAjXkAKCqyYJL6hc2FHADZx3ou7Y3Is1AfACfTw52
> LV3W76pNk4x4denCQCBytX0=
> =hHDZ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----