EL-6 perl(MIME::Lite)

[Paul Howarth]

OK this one has me confused.

I'm doing a scratch build of perl-Sysadm-Install:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2373706

It fails to build and directs me to the root.log to see why:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2373707&name=root.log

Looking at the log, I see:
DEBUG backend.py:605:  /usr/bin/yum --installroot 
/var/lib/mock/dist-6E-epel-build-852947-124778/root/  install 
'perl(Archive::Tar)' 'perl(File::Basename)' 'perl(Expect)' 
'perl(Term::ReadKey)' 'perl(Cwd)' 'perl(Config)'
'perl(LWP::UserAgent)' 
'perl(Test::More)' 'perl(HTTP::Request)' 'perl(HTTP::Status)' 
'perl(File::Temp) >= 0.16' 'perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)'
'perl(Encode)' 
'perl(File::Copy)' 'perl(Log::Log4perl) >= 1.00'
'perl(File::Path)'
DEBUG util.py:291:  Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot 
/var/lib/mock/dist-6E-epel-build-852947-124778/root/  install 
'perl(Archive::Tar)' 'perl(File::Basename)' 'perl(Expect)' 
'perl(Term::ReadKey)' 'perl(Cwd)' 'perl(Config)'
'perl(LWP::UserAgent)' 
'perl(Test::More)' 'perl(HTTP::Request)' 'perl(HTTP::Status)' 
'perl(File::Temp) >= 0.16' 'perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)'
'perl(Encode)' 
'perl(File::Copy)' 'perl(Log::Log4perl) >= 1.00'
'perl(File::Path)'
DEBUG util.py:256:  Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already 
installed and latest version
DEBUG util.py:256:  Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already 
installed and latest version
DEBUG util.py:256:  Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already 
installed and latest version
DEBUG util.py:256:  Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already 
installed and latest version
DEBUG util.py:256:  Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already 
installed and latest version
DEBUG util.py:256:  Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already 
installed and latest version
DEBUG util.py:256:  Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already 
installed and latest version
DEBUG util.py:256:  perl-Log-Dispatch-2.22-4.el6.1.noarch from build has 
depsolving problems
DEBUG util.py:256:    --> Missing Dependency: perl(MIME::Lite) is needed 
by package perl-Log-Dispatch-2.22-4.el6.1.noarch (build)
DEBUG util.py:256:  Error: Missing Dependency: perl(MIME::Lite) is 
needed by package perl-Log-Dispatch-2.22-4.el6.1.noarch (build)
DEBUG util.py:256:   You could try using --skip-broken to work around 
the problem
DEBUG util.py:256:   You could try running: package-cleanup --problems
DEBUG util.py:256:                          package-cleanup --dupes
DEBUG util.py:256:                          rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
DEBUG util.py:256:  The program package-cleanup is found in the 
yum-utils package.
DEBUG util.py:330:  Child returncode was: 1

So I'm thinking that perl-MIME-Lite is another of the packages that's in 
EL-6 beta 2 but not for ppc64, but that's not the case. Looking at 
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/5.90Server/optional/ppc64/os/P... 
I can see perl-MIME-Lite-3.027-2.el6.noarch.rpm and when I download that 
I can see that it provides perl(MIME::Lite) = 3.027. So why can't the 
builder find it?

Paul.

[Paul Howarth]

On 02/08/10 15:22, Paul Howarth wrote:
>  OK this one has me confused.
>
>  I'm doing a scratch build of perl-Sysadm-Install:
>  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2373706
>
>  It fails to build and directs me to the root.log to see why:
>  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2373707&name=root.log
>
>  Looking at the log, I see:
>  DEBUG backend.py:605: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
>  /var/lib/mock/dist-6E-epel-build-852947-124778/root/ install
>  'perl(Archive::Tar)' 'perl(File::Basename)' 'perl(Expect)'
>  'perl(Term::ReadKey)' 'perl(Cwd)' 'perl(Config)'
> 'perl(LWP::UserAgent)'
>  'perl(Test::More)' 'perl(HTTP::Request)' 'perl(HTTP::Status)'
>  'perl(File::Temp) >= 0.16' 'perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)'
> 'perl(Encode)'
>  'perl(File::Copy)' 'perl(Log::Log4perl) >= 1.00'
> 'perl(File::Path)'
>  DEBUG util.py:291: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
>  /var/lib/mock/dist-6E-epel-build-852947-124778/root/ install
>  'perl(Archive::Tar)' 'perl(File::Basename)' 'perl(Expect)'
>  'perl(Term::ReadKey)' 'perl(Cwd)' 'perl(Config)'
> 'perl(LWP::UserAgent)'
>  'perl(Test::More)' 'perl(HTTP::Request)' 'perl(HTTP::Status)'
>  'perl(File::Temp) >= 0.16' 'perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)'
> 'perl(Encode)'
>  'perl(File::Copy)' 'perl(Log::Log4perl) >= 1.00'
> 'perl(File::Path)'
>  DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
>  and latest version
>  DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
>  and latest version
>  DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
>  and latest version
>  DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
>  and latest version
>  DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
>  and latest version
>  DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
>  and latest version
>  DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
>  and latest version
>  DEBUG util.py:256: perl-Log-Dispatch-2.22-4.el6.1.noarch from build has
>  depsolving problems
>  DEBUG util.py:256: --> Missing Dependency: perl(MIME::Lite) is needed by
>  package perl-Log-Dispatch-2.22-4.el6.1.noarch (build)
>  DEBUG util.py:256: Error: Missing Dependency: perl(MIME::Lite) is needed
>  by package perl-Log-Dispatch-2.22-4.el6.1.noarch (build)
>  DEBUG util.py:256: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the
>  problem
>  DEBUG util.py:256: You could try running: package-cleanup --problems
>  DEBUG util.py:256: package-cleanup --dupes
>  DEBUG util.py:256: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
>  DEBUG util.py:256: The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils
>  package.
>  DEBUG util.py:330: Child returncode was: 1
>
>  So I'm thinking that perl-MIME-Lite is another of the packages that's in
>  EL-6 beta 2 but not for ppc64, but that's not the case. Looking at
>  http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/5.90Server/optional/ppc64/os/P...
>  I can see perl-MIME-Lite-3.027-2.el6.noarch.rpm and when I download that
>  I can see that it provides perl(MIME::Lite) = 3.027. So why can't the
>  builder find it? 
This isn't limited to ppc64 either: I got the same problem on an x86_64 
builder.

Paul.

[Iain Arnell]

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org&gt; wrote:
>  On 02/08/10 15:22, Paul Howarth wrote:
> >
> > OK this one has me confused.
> >
> > I'm doing a scratch build of perl-Sysadm-Install:
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2373706
> >
> > It fails to build and directs me to the root.log to see why:
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2373707&name=root.log
> >
> > Looking at the log, I see:
> > DEBUG backend.py:605: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
> > /var/lib/mock/dist-6E-epel-build-852947-124778/root/ install
> > 'perl(Archive::Tar)' 'perl(File::Basename)' 'perl(Expect)'
> > 'perl(Term::ReadKey)' 'perl(Cwd)' 'perl(Config)'
> 'perl(LWP::UserAgent)'
> > 'perl(Test::More)' 'perl(HTTP::Request)'
> 'perl(HTTP::Status)'
> > 'perl(File::Temp) >= 0.16' 'perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)'
> 'perl(Encode)'
> > 'perl(File::Copy)' 'perl(Log::Log4perl) >= 1.00'
> 'perl(File::Path)'
> > DEBUG util.py:291: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
> > /var/lib/mock/dist-6E-epel-build-852947-124778/root/ install
> > 'perl(Archive::Tar)' 'perl(File::Basename)' 'perl(Expect)'
> > 'perl(Term::ReadKey)' 'perl(Cwd)' 'perl(Config)'
> 'perl(LWP::UserAgent)'
> > 'perl(Test::More)' 'perl(HTTP::Request)'
> 'perl(HTTP::Status)'
> > 'perl(File::Temp) >= 0.16' 'perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)'
> 'perl(Encode)'
> > 'perl(File::Copy)' 'perl(Log::Log4perl) >= 1.00'
> 'perl(File::Path)'
> > DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> > and latest version
> > DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> > and latest version
> > DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> > and latest version
> > DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> > and latest version
> > DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> > and latest version
> > DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> > and latest version
> > DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> > and latest version
> > DEBUG util.py:256: perl-Log-Dispatch-2.22-4.el6.1.noarch from build has
> > depsolving problems
> > DEBUG util.py:256: --> Missing Dependency: perl(MIME::Lite) is needed by
> > package perl-Log-Dispatch-2.22-4.el6.1.noarch (build)
> > DEBUG util.py:256: Error: Missing Dependency: perl(MIME::Lite) is needed
> > by package perl-Log-Dispatch-2.22-4.el6.1.noarch (build)
> > DEBUG util.py:256: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the
> > problem
> > DEBUG util.py:256: You could try running: package-cleanup --problems
> > DEBUG util.py:256: package-cleanup --dupes
> > DEBUG util.py:256: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> > DEBUG util.py:256: The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils
> > package.
> > DEBUG util.py:330: Child returncode was: 1
> >
> > So I'm thinking that perl-MIME-Lite is another of the packages that's in
> > EL-6 beta 2 but not for ppc64, but that's not the case. Looking at
> >
> > http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/5.90Server/optional/ppc64/os/P...
> > I can see perl-MIME-Lite-3.027-2.el6.noarch.rpm and when I download that
> > I can see that it provides perl(MIME::Lite) = 3.027. So why can't the
> > builder find it?
>
>  This isn't limited to ppc64 either: I got the same problem on an x86_64
>  builder.
>  
The rpm is there, but it's no longer referenced in the latest
primary.xml. It seems to have been in the original beta2, but not in
the latest refresh. In fact, it looks like the beta2-refresh (why not
beta3?) was prepared and createrepo'd elsewhere and simply copied over
the top of the existing beta directory leaving a whole bunch of
orphaned rpms.


-- 
Iain.

[Mark Chappell]

Iain Arnell wrote:
>  The rpm is there, but it's no longer referenced in the latest
>  primary.xml. It seems to have been in the original beta2, but not in
>  the latest refresh. In fact, it looks like the beta2-refresh (why not
>  beta3?) was prepared and createrepo'd elsewhere and simply copied over
>  the top of the existing beta directory leaving a whole bunch of
>  orphaned rpms. 
Indeed, a branch request is in...

Apparently it was deliberate to do this, grumbles have been sent in the
appropriate directions.


Mark

[Mark Chappell]

Mark Chappell wrote:
>  Iain Arnell wrote:
> > The rpm is there, but it's no longer referenced in the latest
> > primary.xml. It seems to have been in the original beta2, but not in
> > the latest refresh. In fact, it looks like the beta2-refresh (why not
> > beta3?) was prepared and createrepo'd elsewhere and simply copied over
> > the top of the existing beta directory leaving a whole bunch of
> > orphaned rpms.
>  
>  Indeed, a branch request is in. 
Or not, It's perl-MIME-Types I requested....


Mark

[Paul Howarth]

On 02/08/10 16:02, Mark Chappell wrote:
>  Mark Chappell wrote:
> > Iain Arnell wrote:
> >> The rpm is there, but it's no longer referenced in the latest
> >> primary.xml. It seems to have been in the original beta2, but not in
> >> the latest refresh. In fact, it looks like the beta2-refresh (why not
> >> beta3?) was prepared and createrepo'd elsewhere and simply copied over
> >> the top of the existing beta directory leaving a whole bunch of
> >> orphaned rpms.
> >
> > Indeed, a branch request is in.
>
>  Or not, It's perl-MIME-Types I requested.... 
OK, I raised it as http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620459

Paul.

[Paul Howarth]

On 02/08/10 15:58, Mark Chappell wrote:
>  Iain Arnell wrote:
> > The rpm is there, but it's no longer referenced in the latest
> > primary.xml. It seems to have been in the original beta2, but not in
> > the latest refresh. In fact, it looks like the beta2-refresh (why not
> > beta3?) was prepared and createrepo'd elsewhere and simply copied over
> > the top of the existing beta directory leaving a whole bunch of
> > orphaned rpms.
>
>  Indeed, a branch request is in...
>
>  Apparently it was deliberate to do this, grumbles have been sent in the
>  appropriate directions. 
Do you have a BZ number for the branch request?

Paul.

[Paul Howarth]

On 02/08/10 15:40, Iain Arnell wrote:
>  On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Paul Howarth<paul(a)city-fan.org>
>  wrote:
> > On 02/08/10 15:22, Paul Howarth wrote:
> >>
> >> OK this one has me confused.
> >>
> >> I'm doing a scratch build of perl-Sysadm-Install:
> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2373706
> >>
> >> It fails to build and directs me to the root.log to see why:
> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2373707&name=root.log
> >>
> >> Looking at the log, I see:
> >> DEBUG backend.py:605: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
> >> /var/lib/mock/dist-6E-epel-build-852947-124778/root/ install
> >> 'perl(Archive::Tar)' 'perl(File::Basename)'
> 'perl(Expect)'
> >> 'perl(Term::ReadKey)' 'perl(Cwd)' 'perl(Config)'
> 'perl(LWP::UserAgent)'
> >> 'perl(Test::More)' 'perl(HTTP::Request)'
> 'perl(HTTP::Status)'
> >> 'perl(File::Temp)>= 0.16' 'perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)'
> 'perl(Encode)'
> >> 'perl(File::Copy)' 'perl(Log::Log4perl)>= 1.00'
> 'perl(File::Path)'
> >> DEBUG util.py:291: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
> >> /var/lib/mock/dist-6E-epel-build-852947-124778/root/ install
> >> 'perl(Archive::Tar)' 'perl(File::Basename)'
> 'perl(Expect)'
> >> 'perl(Term::ReadKey)' 'perl(Cwd)' 'perl(Config)'
> 'perl(LWP::UserAgent)'
> >> 'perl(Test::More)' 'perl(HTTP::Request)'
> 'perl(HTTP::Status)'
> >> 'perl(File::Temp)>= 0.16' 'perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)'
> 'perl(Encode)'
> >> 'perl(File::Copy)' 'perl(Log::Log4perl)>= 1.00'
> 'perl(File::Path)'
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> >> and latest version
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> >> and latest version
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> >> and latest version
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> >> and latest version
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> >> and latest version
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> >> and latest version
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: Package 4:perl-5.10.1-113.el6.ppc64 already installed
> >> and latest version
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: perl-Log-Dispatch-2.22-4.el6.1.noarch from build has
> >> depsolving problems
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: -->  Missing Dependency: perl(MIME::Lite) is needed by
> >> package perl-Log-Dispatch-2.22-4.el6.1.noarch (build)
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: Error: Missing Dependency: perl(MIME::Lite) is needed
> >> by package perl-Log-Dispatch-2.22-4.el6.1.noarch (build)
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the
> >> problem
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: You could try running: package-cleanup --problems
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: package-cleanup --dupes
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> >> DEBUG util.py:256: The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils
> >> package.
> >> DEBUG util.py:330: Child returncode was: 1
> >>
> >> So I'm thinking that perl-MIME-Lite is another of the packages that's in
> >> EL-6 beta 2 but not for ppc64, but that's not the case. Looking at
> >>
> >>
> http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/5.90Server/optional/ppc64/os/P...
> >> I can see perl-MIME-Lite-3.027-2.el6.noarch.rpm and when I download that
> >> I can see that it provides perl(MIME::Lite) = 3.027. So why can't the
> >> builder find it?
> >
> > This isn't limited to ppc64 either: I got the same problem on an x86_64
> > builder.
> >
>
>  The rpm is there, but it's no longer referenced in the latest
>  primary.xml. It seems to have been in the original beta2, but not in
>  the latest refresh. In fact, it looks like the beta2-refresh (why not
>  beta3?) was prepared and createrepo'd elsewhere and simply copied over
>  the top of the existing beta directory leaving a whole bunch of
>  orphaned rpms. 
OK, so that's another one that needs branching for EPEL-6 then.

I'll get on it.

Thanks for the explanation.

Paul.