3:51 p.m.
IS there any chance of meeting either one hour prior or two hours
later than our normal time? The chances of me being able to make a
meeting and stay the whole time would be much higher.
stahnma
4:38 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Michael Stahnke <mastahnke(a)gmail.com>wrote:
IS there any chance of meeting either one hour prior or two hours
later than our normal time? The chances of me being able to make a
meeting and stay the whole time would be much higher.
two hour later would be great for me.
--
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
4:43 p.m.
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 23:38:33 +0200
Xavier Lamien <laxathom(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Michael Stahnke
<mastahnke(a)gmail.com>wrote:
> IS there any chance of meeting either one hour prior or two hours
> later than our normal time? The chances of me being able to make a
> meeting and stay the whole time would be much higher.
>
>
two hour later would be great for me.
Would be better for me too most days. The earlier time I am still
dealing with monday morning emails and such.
kevin
4:56 p.m.
On 12 September 2010 22:51, Michael Stahnke <mastahnke(a)gmail.com> wrote:
IS there any chance of meeting either one hour prior or two hours
later than our normal time? The chances of me being able to make a
meeting and stay the whole time would be much higher.
Due to a change in timezone 2 hours later would be better for me too...
Mark
5:14 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 15:56, Mark Chappell <tremble(a)tremble.org.uk> wrote:
On 12 September 2010 22:51, Michael Stahnke
<mastahnke(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> IS there any chance of meeting either one hour prior or two hours
> later than our normal time? The chances of me being able to make a
> meeting and stay the whole time would be much higher.
Due to a change in timezone 2 hours later would be better for me too...
So we are saying 1800 UTC would work better correect? Do we wish to
change that tomorrow?
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
“The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.”
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"We have a strategic plan. It's called doing things.""
— Herb Kelleher, founder Southwest Airlines
1:17 p.m.
On 13 September 2010 00:14, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So we are saying 1800 UTC would work better correect? Do we wish to
change that tomorrow?
So at the meeting we said we were going to revisit the question of
what time to schedule the meeting for by bouncing it back to the
list...
There seemed to be a general consensus that Mon 1600UTC wasn't that
brilliant a time and 1800UTC seemed to work better, except for smooge
who now has a regular board meeting then.
Let's try getting the ball rolling, how does Mondays 1900UTC on #epel sound?
Mark
1:31 p.m.
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:17:57 +0200
Mark Chappell <tremble(a)tremble.org.uk> wrote:
On 13 September 2010 00:14, Stephen John Smoogen
<smooge(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> So we are saying 1800 UTC would work better correect? Do we wish to
> change that tomorrow?
So at the meeting we said we were going to revisit the question of
what time to schedule the meeting for by bouncing it back to the
list...
Yep. ;)
There seemed to be a general consensus that Mon 1600UTC wasn't
that
brilliant a time and 1800UTC seemed to work better, except for smooge
who now has a regular board meeting then.
Also, Fedora-fr has #fedora-meeting from 18:30-19:30UTC.
Let's try getting the ball rolling, how does Mondays 1900UTC on
#epel
sound?
Well, I would prefer if we could at all to use #fedora-meeting. ;)
Would 17:00 or 17:30 work for people?
Or would 19:30 work?
any of those works for me.
kevin
2:52 p.m.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 13:27, Michael Stahnke <mastahnke(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Mark Chappell
<tremble(a)tremble.org.uk> wrote:
> On 14 September 2010 20:31, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
>> Or would 19:30 work?
I could do that, but I would often have to take a few minutes early from that.
OK a couple of things.
1) Very very few people ever talk on the meeting who aren't already
sitting #epel. I can see the "lets use the meeting room" but really
the channel seems just as good.
2) You guys accomplished more in that meeting I could not make than we
have done with me runniung it. If 1800 works.. I have no problem with
using it.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
“The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.”
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"We have a strategic plan. It's called doing things.""
— Herb Kelleher, founder Southwest Airlines
1:26 p.m.
Okay so we seem to have a couple of choices,
a) 1800 UTC in #epel (smooge can't make)
b) 1900 UTC in #epel (nirik would prefer us to us #f-m which is busy)
c) 1930 UTC in #f-m (stahnma may need to leave early)
Personally My preference goes b,c,a
I value smooge's input and as smooge pointed out most people who talk
in the meeting are already on #epel (and I'm currently UTC+2 so would
rather hold it on #epel than make it later)
I would also suggest that if we want to change the time again we
mention it on the list so people can express a preference in absentia,
but make the decision at the meeting, just so it's made...
Mark
4960
days inactive
4968
days old
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
14 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Kevin Fenzi -
Mark Chappell -
Michael Stahnke -
Stephen John Smoogen -
Xavier Lamien