IS there any chance of meeting either one hour prior or two hours later than our normal time? The chances of me being able to make a meeting and stay the whole time would be much higher.
stahnma
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Michael Stahnke mastahnke@gmail.comwrote:
IS there any chance of meeting either one hour prior or two hours later than our normal time? The chances of me being able to make a meeting and stay the whole time would be much higher.
two hour later would be great for me.
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 23:38:33 +0200 Xavier Lamien laxathom@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Michael Stahnke mastahnke@gmail.comwrote:
IS there any chance of meeting either one hour prior or two hours later than our normal time? The chances of me being able to make a meeting and stay the whole time would be much higher.
two hour later would be great for me.
Would be better for me too most days. The earlier time I am still dealing with monday morning emails and such.
kevin
On 12 September 2010 22:51, Michael Stahnke mastahnke@gmail.com wrote:
IS there any chance of meeting either one hour prior or two hours later than our normal time? The chances of me being able to make a meeting and stay the whole time would be much higher.
Due to a change in timezone 2 hours later would be better for me too...
Mark
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 15:56, Mark Chappell tremble@tremble.org.uk wrote:
On 12 September 2010 22:51, Michael Stahnke mastahnke@gmail.com wrote:
IS there any chance of meeting either one hour prior or two hours later than our normal time? The chances of me being able to make a meeting and stay the whole time would be much higher.
Due to a change in timezone 2 hours later would be better for me too...
So we are saying 1800 UTC would work better correect? Do we wish to change that tomorrow?
On 13 September 2010 00:14, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
So we are saying 1800 UTC would work better correect? Do we wish to change that tomorrow?
+1
Mark
On 13 September 2010 00:14, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
So we are saying 1800 UTC would work better correect? Do we wish to change that tomorrow?
So at the meeting we said we were going to revisit the question of what time to schedule the meeting for by bouncing it back to the list...
There seemed to be a general consensus that Mon 1600UTC wasn't that brilliant a time and 1800UTC seemed to work better, except for smooge who now has a regular board meeting then.
Let's try getting the ball rolling, how does Mondays 1900UTC on #epel sound?
Mark
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:17:57 +0200 Mark Chappell tremble@tremble.org.uk wrote:
On 13 September 2010 00:14, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
So we are saying 1800 UTC would work better correect? Do we wish to change that tomorrow?
So at the meeting we said we were going to revisit the question of what time to schedule the meeting for by bouncing it back to the list...
Yep. ;)
There seemed to be a general consensus that Mon 1600UTC wasn't that brilliant a time and 1800UTC seemed to work better, except for smooge who now has a regular board meeting then.
Also, Fedora-fr has #fedora-meeting from 18:30-19:30UTC.
Let's try getting the ball rolling, how does Mondays 1900UTC on #epel sound?
Well, I would prefer if we could at all to use #fedora-meeting. ;)
Would 17:00 or 17:30 work for people? Or would 19:30 work?
any of those works for me.
kevin
On 14 September 2010 20:31, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
Or would 19:30 work?
From memory this would probably be the better time for a number of
people. Personally I wouldn't want to start any later than that though.
Mark
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Mark Chappell tremble@tremble.org.uk wrote:
On 14 September 2010 20:31, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
Or would 19:30 work?
I could do that, but I would often have to take a few minutes early from that.
stahnma
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 13:27, Michael Stahnke mastahnke@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Mark Chappell tremble@tremble.org.uk wrote:
On 14 September 2010 20:31, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
Or would 19:30 work?
I could do that, but I would often have to take a few minutes early from that.
OK a couple of things.
1) Very very few people ever talk on the meeting who aren't already sitting #epel. I can see the "lets use the meeting room" but really the channel seems just as good.
2) You guys accomplished more in that meeting I could not make than we have done with me runniung it. If 1800 works.. I have no problem with using it.
Okay so we seem to have a couple of choices,
a) 1800 UTC in #epel (smooge can't make) b) 1900 UTC in #epel (nirik would prefer us to us #f-m which is busy) c) 1930 UTC in #f-m (stahnma may need to leave early)
Personally My preference goes b,c,a
I value smooge's input and as smooge pointed out most people who talk in the meeting are already on #epel (and I'm currently UTC+2 so would rather hold it on #epel than make it later)
I would also suggest that if we want to change the time again we mention it on the list so people can express a preference in absentia, but make the decision at the meeting, just so it's made...
Mark
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Kevin Fenzi -
Mark Chappell -
Michael Stahnke -
Stephen John Smoogen -
Xavier Lamien