Re: Some work for the Erlang SIG
Hello All!
ср, 12 дек. 2018 г. в 21:42, Timothée Floure <timothee.floure(a)fnux.ch>:
* Replace rebar2 by rebar3 (following upstream) to build all of our
Erlang
packages (do we need to announce a change?)
Sounds good. I believe that we should keep current rebar2 macros
(rename it) and use rebar3 as a default builder.
* Make better use of the Hex package repository [2]
Sounds good as well. Not sure if rebar3 has a support for hexpm yet.
* Push them to the official guidelines [3]
Since we don't have official guidelines yet, this one is the easiest :)
As for the Erlang SIG itself, I'd like to extend it to the elixir
language [4],
which is built atop the Erlang environment and is already packaged (I
co-maintain it) in Fedora. It would also be nice (mentioned by Randy if I
remember well) for the erlang SIG to be able to access any erlang library in
dist-git as it is already done for some other language-specific SIGs.
Good catch. I think we need some dedicated bot for that (mass changes, etc).
What do you think? Can I go ahead and start working on mentioned
tasks?
Sure go on!
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.