[Bug 1023960] New: erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960

            Bug ID: 1023960
           Summary: erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary
                    arches
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 20
         Component: erlang
          Assignee: lemenkov(a)gmail.com
          Reporter: dan(a)danny.cz
        QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
                CC: erlang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lemenkov(a)gmail.com,
                    rhbugs(a)n-dimensional.de
            Blocks: 467765 (ZedoraTracker)



erlang-R16B-02 fails to build on secondary arches, seen on ppc and s390, but I
guess aarch64 would also fail.

from s390 build.log
(http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1243484):
...
gcc  -Werror=return-type   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -g -pipe -Wall
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches  -m31 -march=z9-109 -mtune=z10
-fno-strict-aliasing
-I/builddir/build/BUILD/otp_src_R16B02/erts/s390-ibm-linux-gnu 
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fno-tree-copyrename  -D_GNU_SOURCE
-DERTS_SMP -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -DUSE_THREADS -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT
-DPOSIX_THREADS -D_POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS   -Is390-ibm-linux-gnu/opt/smp
-Ibeam -Isys/unix -Isys/common -Is390-ibm-linux-gnu -Ipcre -Ihipe -I../include
-I../include/s390-ibm-linux-gnu -I../include/internal
-I../include/internal/s390-ibm-linux-gnu -c beam/erl_bif_info.c -o
obj/s390-ibm-linux-gnu/opt/smp/erl_bif_info.o
In file included from beam/erl_bif_info.c:30:0:
beam/erl_bif_info.c: In function 'system_info_1':
beam/erl_bif_info.c:2073:10: error: 'hipe_arch_name' undeclared (first use in
this function)
  BIF_RET(hipe_arch_name);
          ^
beam/bif.h:118:28: note: in definition of macro 'BIF_RET'
 #define BIF_RET(x) return (x)
                            ^
beam/erl_bif_info.c:2073:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only
once for each function it appears in
  BIF_RET(hipe_arch_name);
          ^
beam/bif.h:118:28: note: in definition of macro 'BIF_RET'
 #define BIF_RET(x) return (x)
                            ^
make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/otp_src_R16B02/erts/emulator'
make[3]: *** [obj/s390-ibm-linux-gnu/opt/smp/erl_bif_info.o] Error 1


from ppc build.log
(http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1483569):
...
gcc  -Werror=return-type   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -g -pipe -Wall
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches  -m32 -fno-strict-aliasing
-I/builddir/build/BUILD/otp_src_R16B02/erts/powerpc-redhat-linux-gnu 
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fno-tree-copyrename  -D_GNU_SOURCE
-DERTS_SMP -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -DUSE_THREADS -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT
-DPOSIX_THREADS -D_POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS  
-Ipowerpc-redhat-linux-gnu/opt/smp -Ibeam -Isys/unix -Isys/common
-Ipowerpc-redhat-linux-gnu -Ipcre -Ihipe -I../include
-I../include/powerpc-redhat-linux-gnu -I../include/internal
-I../include/internal/powerpc-redhat-linux-gnu -c beam/erl_bif_info.c -o
obj/powerpc-redhat-linux-gnu/opt/smp/erl_bif_info.o
In file included from beam/erl_bif_info.c:30:0:
beam/erl_bif_info.c: In function 'system_info_1':
hipe/hipe_ppc.h:63:24: error: 'am_powerpc' undeclared (first use in this
function)
 #define hipe_arch_name am_powerpc
                        ^
beam/bif.h:118:28: note: in definition of macro 'BIF_RET'
 #define BIF_RET(x) return (x)
                            ^
beam/erl_bif_info.c:2073:10: note: in expansion of macro 'hipe_arch_name'
  BIF_RET(hipe_arch_name);
          ^
hipe/hipe_ppc.h:63:24: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once
for each function it appears in
 #define hipe_arch_name am_powerpc
                        ^
beam/bif.h:118:28: note: in definition of macro 'BIF_RET'
 #define BIF_RET(x) return (x)
                            ^
beam/erl_bif_info.c:2073:10: note: in expansion of macro 'hipe_arch_name'
  BIF_RET(hipe_arch_name);
          ^
make[3]: *** [obj/powerpc-redhat-linux-gnu/opt/smp/erl_bif_info.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/otp_src_R16B02/erts/emulator'



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20


proposed solution:
diff --git a/erlang.spec b/erlang.spec
index 1d4cbfd..50bbe68 100644
--- a/erlang.spec
+++ b/erlang.spec
@@ -966,9 +966,15 @@ rm -f lib/ssl/examples/certs/etc/erlangCA/index.txt.old

 %build
 %ifarch sparcv9 sparc64
-CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -mcpu=ultrasparc -fno-strict-aliasing" %configure
--enable-shared-zlib --enable-sctp --enable-hipe
+CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -mcpu=ultrasparc -fno-strict-aliasing" \
 %else
-CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fno-strict-aliasing" %configure --enable-shared-zlib
--enable-sctp --enable-hipe
+CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fno-strict-aliasing" \
+%endif
+%configure --enable-shared-zlib --enable-sctp \
+%ifnarch s390 s390x ppc
+    --enable-hipe
+%else
+    %{nil}
 %endif

or maybe using %ifarch with a positive list like %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm} would be
even better


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467765
[Bug 467765] Fedora for System z (s390): Bug Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960

Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #1 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz&gt; ---
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1485226 is a scratch
build with hipe enabled on ppc64 and disabled on ppc

my local test builds on s390 and s390x were successful with hipe disabled using
the snippet from above

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #1)
>  http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1485226 is a
> scratch
>  build with hipe enabled on ppc64 and disabled on ppc
>  
>  my local test builds on s390 and s390x were successful with hipe disabled
>  using the snippet from above 
Dan, could you please try the latest build:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=474347

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #3 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz&gt; ---
scratch builds started
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1244397
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1487519

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #3)
>  scratch builds started
>  http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1244397
>  http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1487519 
Dan, I'm terribly terribly sorry but I've made a typo in the spec-file which
disabled HiPE entirely. Could you please try with the latest build (in progress
at the moment of writing):

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6111139

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #5 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz&gt; ---
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #4)
>  (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #3)
>  > scratch builds started
>  > http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1244397
>  > http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1487519
>  
>  Dan, I'm terribly terribly sorry but I've made a typo in the spec-file which
>  disabled HiPE entirely. Could you please try with the latest build (in
>  progress at the moment of writing):
>  
>  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6111139 
no problem :-) I will start new scratch builds after this one finishes and let
you know

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz&gt; ---
new scratch builds
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1244424
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1488408

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #7 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz&gt; ---
all ppc went OK, but s390 failed because now hipe is again unconditionally
enabled, the snippet bellow fixes it

diff --git a/erlang.spec b/erlang.spec
index 6c3b085..a850f27 100644
--- a/erlang.spec
+++ b/erlang.spec
@@ -22,8 +22,6 @@

 %ifarch %{arm} %{ix86} x86_64 ppc %{power64}
 %global __with_hipe 1
-%else
-%global __with_hipe 0
 %endif

 %global n_uvr %{name}-%{upstream_ver}-%{upstream_rel_for_rpm}

the semantics for the "inline condition" looks weird ...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
Ok, I think we've fixed that. Dan, could you please try it again with the
latest packages.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #9 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz&gt; ---
Peter, thanks for the changes, it must succeed now. The scratch builds are
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1252454
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1514758

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #10 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz&gt; ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #9)
>  Peter, thanks for the changes, it must succeed now. The scratch
> builds are
>  http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1252454
>  http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1514758 
and both succeeded, please do updates in all branches where R16B-02 should
exist

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #10)
>  (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #9)
>  > Peter, thanks for the changes, it must succeed now. The scratch builds are
>  > http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1252454
>  > http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1514758
>  
>  and both succeeded, please do updates in all branches where R16B-02 should
>  exist 
Ok, good! I'll postpone updating F19/F20 until I resolve another one issue
(return of ECC in Erlang).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #12 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz&gt; ---
Peter, as I see the crypto stuff is not resolved yet, but missing erlang is
causing us some troubles, could you please do the updates for F19/F20?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #12)
>  Peter, as I see the crypto stuff is not resolved yet, but missing
> erlang is
>  causing us some troubles, could you please do the updates for F19/F20? 
Just give me a couple of days more - I'll try to fix it during this weekend. If
I won't find a free time for that then I'll rebuild f19 and f20 as is.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #14 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz&gt; ---
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #13)
>  (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #12)
>  > Peter, as I see the crypto stuff is not resolved yet, but missing erlang is
>  > causing us some troubles, could you please do the updates for F19/F20?
>  
>  Just give me a couple of days more - I'll try to fix it during this weekend.
>  If I won't find a free time for that then I'll rebuild f19 and f20 as is. 
works for me, thanks

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960

Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
erlang-R16B-02.7.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-R16B-02.7.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
erlang-R16B-02.7.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-R16B-02.7.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
erlang-R16B-02.7.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-R16B-02.7.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960

Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
Package erlang-R16B-02.7.fc20:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing erlang-R16B-02.7.fc20'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22163/erlang-R16B-02....
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960

Fedora Blocker Bugs Application <blockerbugs(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dan(a)danny.cz
             Blocks|                            |980657
                   |                            |(F20FinalFreezeException,Fi
                   |                            |nalFreezeException)



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Blocker Bugs Application <blockerbugs(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
---
Proposed as a Freeze Exception for 20-final by Fedora user sharkcz using the
blocker tracking app because:

 Erlang R16B02 was FTBFS on secondary arches


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980657
[Bug 980657] Fedora 20 Final freeze exception bug tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960

Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |awilliam(a)redhat.com
         Whiteboard|                            |AcceptedFreezeException



--- Comment #20 from Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com&gt; ---
Discussed at 2013-12-02 freeze exception review meeting:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-12-02/f20-blo...
. Accepted as a freeze exception issue as a significant bug for secondary
arches whose fix is unlikely to break anything important for primary arches.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960

Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |erlang-R16B-02.7.fc20
         Resolution|---                         |ERRATA
        Last Closed|                            |2013-12-05 07:14:19



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
erlang-R16B-02.7.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1023960] erlang-R16B-02.2.fc20 fails to build on secondary arches

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023960

Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|erlang-R16B-02.7.fc20       |erlang-R16B-02.7.fc19



--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
erlang-R16B-02.7.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.