[Bug 1206714] New: CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
3:32 p.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Bug ID: 1206714
Summary: CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to
Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: erlang
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: high
Priority: high
Assignee: rjones(a)redhat.com
Reporter: fleite(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: erlang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gemi(a)bluewin.ch,
rjones(a)redhat.com, s(a)shk.io
Blocks: 1206712 (CVE-2015-2774)
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks"
field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While
only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions
at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each
other, you may clone this bug as appropriate.
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206712
[Bug 1206712] CVE-2015-2774 Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its
TLS-1.0 implementation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:32 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #1 from Fabio Olive Leite <fleite(a)redhat.com> ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated bugs get updated
when new packages are pushed to stable.
=====
# bugfix, security, enhancement, newpackage (required)
type=security
# testing, stable
request=testing
# Bug numbers: 1234,9876
bugs=1206712,1206714
# Description of your update
notes=Security fix for CVE-2015-2774
# Enable request automation based on the stable/unstable karma thresholds
autokarma=True
stable_karma=3
unstable_karma=-3
# Automatically close bugs when this marked as stable
close_bugs=True
# Suggest that users restart after update
suggest_reboot=False
======
Additionally, you may opt to use the bodhi update submission link instead:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=1206...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:55 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jeckersb(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> ---
Adding Rabbit maintainer just FYI.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:03 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
David A. Cafaro <dac(a)cafaro.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dac(a)cafaro.net
Whiteboard| |fst_owner=dcafaro
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:54 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #3 from David A. Cafaro <dac(a)cafaro.net> ---
Just checking in on the status of this patch?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:16 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #4 from David A. Cafaro <dac(a)cafaro.net> ---
Looking upstream it appears a patch for this was added in Release 17.5 and
later.
http://www.erlang.org/download/otp_src_17.5.readme
"OTP-12420 Application(s): ssl
*** POTENTIAL INCOMPATIBILITY ***
Add padding check for TLS-1.0 to remove Poodle
vulnerability from TLS 1.0, also add the option
padding_check. This option only affects TLS-1.0
connections and if set to false it disables the block
cipher padding check to be able to interoperate with
legacy software.
OTP-12458 Application(s): ssl
Add support for TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV used to prevent
undesired TLS version downgrades. If used by a client
that is vulnerable to the POODLE attack, and the server
also supports TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV, the attack can be
prevented."
I have not found a back port to the current Release 14 Beta 4 in the repos.
Do we have any status on a fix for this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:05 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
David A. Cafaro <dac(a)cafaro.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(rjones(a)redhat.com
| |)
--- Comment #5 from David A. Cafaro <dac(a)cafaro.net> ---
Need a status update on this, are there plans to patch?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:15 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(rjones(a)redhat.com |needinfo?(jeckersb(a)redhat.c
|) |om)
--- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> ---
You probably want to ask the Rabbit maintainer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:24 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
David A. Cafaro <dac(a)cafaro.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(jeckersb(a)redhat.c
| |om)
--- Comment #7 from David A. Cafaro <dac(a)cafaro.net> ---
Ping? Need to get this patched.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:59 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |lemenkov(a)gmail.com
Assignee|rjones(a)redhat.com |lemenkov(a)gmail.com
Flags|needinfo?(jeckersb(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
|needinfo?(jeckersb(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> ---
Hello!
I'll fix it soon (before or during this weekend).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:10 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #9 from David A. Cafaro <dac(a)cafaro.net> ---
How goes the patching work?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:43 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
David A. Cafaro <dac(a)cafaro.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(lemenkov(a)gmail.co
| |m)
--- Comment #10 from David A. Cafaro <dac(a)cafaro.net> ---
Been another week, are you working on it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:57 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
David A. Cafaro <dac(a)cafaro.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whiteboard|fst_owner=dcafaro |fst_owner=dcafaro,
| |fst_ping=2
Flags| |needinfo?(lemenkov(a)gmail.co
| |m)
--- Comment #11 from David A. Cafaro <dac(a)cafaro.net> ---
Any word on the update for this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:15 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(lemenkov(a)gmail.co |
|m) |
|needinfo?(lemenkov(a)gmail.co |
|m) |
--- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to David A. Cafaro from comment #11)
Any word on the update for this?
Sorry still don't have much time for that. If someone can help with backporting
that woiuld be very appreciated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:24 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #13 from John Eckersberg <jeckersb(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #12)
(In reply to David A. Cafaro from comment #11)
> Any word on the update for this?
Sorry still don't have much time for that. If someone can help with
backporting that woiuld be very appreciated.
I'll take a stab at it. I just requested commit access in pkgdb for erlang, so
I'll need you or someone else to approve it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:50 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
John Eckersberg <jeckersb(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|lemenkov(a)gmail.com |jeckersb(a)redhat.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:29 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
John Eckersberg <jeckersb(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(rjones(a)redhat.com
| |)
--- Comment #14 from John Eckersberg <jeckersb(a)redhat.com> ---
Rich, can you approve my commit ACLs for EPEL6/7, looks like Peter can only
approve for the Fedora branches:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/erlang
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:13 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(rjones(a)redhat.com |
|) |
--- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> ---
That should be done now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:53 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #16 from John Eckersberg <jeckersb(a)redhat.com> ---
I backported the patch from OTP 17 -> R16B03-1, which is what is in EPEL7, and
it's currently building. I'll submit the update when it's done.
EPEL6 is on R14B, which I suspect is probably going to be a much more involved,
if not nearly impossible backport. I'm going to go look at it now, but there
is a high probability that I am going to leave EPEL6 as-is unless somebody
really really really wants it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:23 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:23 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
erlang-R16B-03.11.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-R16B-03.11.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:04 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
Package erlang-R16B-03.11.el7:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing erlang-R16B-03.11.el7'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7562/erlang-R16B...
then log in and leave karma (feedback).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:55 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
erlang-R16B-03.11.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:55 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1206714] CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version| |R16B-03.11.el7
Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed| |2015-09-02 01:55:10
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3152
days inactive
3311
days old
erlang@lists.fedoraproject.org
23 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Red Hat Bugzilla