Thomas,
I based my large range of ports on a recent bug filed at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983088#c9
I am reviewing the other emails that came from Laine Stump...
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Thomas Woerner twoerner@redhat.com wrote:
Hello John,
On 10/30/2013 12:45 AM, John Call wrote:
Given the popularity of virtualization these days, I'd like to see a SPICE service definition file come "out-of-the-box" with firewalld. Is this something that could be approached at this level, or would should the request be directed to the libvirt/qemu team? For example, I think the definition below should be shipped as predefined/standard service.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<service> <short>Simple Protocol for Independent Computing Environments (SPICE)</short> <description>SPICE is an adaptive remote rendering protocol for virtual environments. The range of allowed ports will allow up to 256 concurrent remote console sessions to running virtual machines.</description> <port protocol="tcp" port="5900-6411"/>
This is really a huge port range. There are lots of ports in this range that are not SPICE specific.
Can you provide a list of ports that is used only for SPICE?
</service> > > Thanks for your consideration, > John > > > ______________________________**_________________ > firewalld-users mailing list > firewalld-users@lists.**fedorahosted.org<firewalld-users@lists.fedorahosted.org> > https://lists.fedorahosted.**org/mailman/listinfo/**firewalld-users<https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/firewalld-users> > > Regards, Thomas ______________________________**_________________ firewalld-users mailing list firewalld-users@lists.**fedorahosted.org<firewalld-users@lists.fedorahosted.org> https://lists.fedorahosted.**org/mailman/listinfo/**firewalld-users<https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/firewalld-users>