Thomas,

I based my large range of ports on a recent bug filed at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983088#c9

I am reviewing the other emails that came from Laine Stump...




On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Thomas Woerner <twoerner@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello John,


On 10/30/2013 12:45 AM, John Call wrote:
Given the popularity of virtualization these days, I'd like to see a
SPICE service definition file come "out-of-the-box" with firewalld.  Is
this something that could be approached at this level, or would should
the request be directed to the libvirt/qemu team?  For example, I think
the definition below should be shipped as predefined/standard service.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<service>
   <short>Simple Protocol for Independent Computing Environments
(SPICE)</short>
   <description>SPICE is an adaptive remote rendering protocol for
virtual environments.  The range of allowed ports will allow up to 256
concurrent remote console sessions to running virtual
machines.</description>
   <port protocol="tcp" port="5900-6411"/>

This is really a huge port range. There are lots of ports in this range that are not SPICE specific.

Can you provide a list of ports that is used only for SPICE?

</service>

Thanks for your consideration,
John


_______________________________________________
firewalld-users mailing list
firewalld-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/firewalld-users


Regards,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
firewalld-users mailing list
firewalld-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/firewalld-users