Le 30/09/2013 20:54, Matthew Miller a écrit :

>
> It would be very helpful to have Flock right before we start the actual
> three-project branches. Since we can't, sadly, have as many Flocks as
> releases, that suggests that maybe we should have F21 as a normal or even
> short cycle release, followed by Flock in June. (Which should be okay for
> finding space at universities.)
>

Depending the country, there are teaching activity up to mid-july and
june is usually an exams month is some european countries.
http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/facts_and_figures/academic_calendar_EN.pdf

A safe bet would be in the second half of july.

> I don't know if Fedora Activity Days for the product working groups would be
> useful or not; they'll also need to be good at remote collaboration for the
> bulk of the work anyway, but a FAD might help to kick things off. What I
> *would* like to see is a FAD for QA and rel-eng automation, because we'll
> need that in order to actually pull off having three separate products. (We
> need it now anyway, in fact, but, then, that times three.)
>
> That way, we're laying the groundwork for the next phase even if we're not
> immediately launching it. I'm kind of excited about launching *something*,
> but having it actually get to orbit or escape velocity (pick your
> metaphorical destination) is... the actual point, so if it takes a little
> longer to get launched and that gives us better success, that's not bad.
>
> And, we're not sitting completely still; promoting the cloud image as
> first-class is a big change even if the product isn't more differentiated.
> We also can work on Fedora EPIC and other "Ring 2" ideas in parallel.
>
>

best regards,
H.

_______________________________________________
flock-planning mailing list
flock-planning@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/flock-planning