Il 20/apr/2017 03:57 PM, "Brian Exelbierd" <bex@pobox.com> ha scritto:


On Thu, Apr 20, 2017, at 03:01 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 04/20/2017 06:49 AM, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017, at 08:53 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> ...
> >> Call for Proposals Notes
> >> ==============
> >>
> >> regcfp RFEs for CFP:
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> 1) We need a new field for CFP submission. The field should allow
> >> session proposers to indicate "Who needs to be present in this session
> >> for it to be successful?"  User needs to include name or FAS ID in
> >> regcfp UI. A multi-value field for this to allow for multiple people to
> >> be indicated in the answer is desirable. It would also be nice for the
> >> field to allow freeform name entry and FAS id lookup.
> >>
> >> 2) We need a new CFP submission field to ask proposers to indicate how
> >> much time they would like for their session. puiterwijk suggested using
> >> the tracks system for this. A number of durations should be available to
> >> be selected from. (What durations? Multiple of a common unit?) (Maybe
> >> there should be an unsure option?)
> >
> > My gut feeling after the session yesterday was: 60, 120, 240
> >
> I think it should be different for the level-setting talks, the "do"
> sessions
> and the report-outs.
>
> My suggestions:
>
>  * Talks on Day 1 may have either 30 or 60 minute slots
>
>  * "do" sessions cannot be successful at shorter than 120 minutes (from
>  past
> experience). The first hour of any workshop always involves getting
> everyone up
> and running.

I like it.  To make it easy to select in the track list, I am
interpreting your idea to be choices of:

Talk (30 min)
Talk (60 min)
Do-Session (120 Min)
Do-Session (240 Min)

>  * All approved sessions for days two and three have a mandatory
>  15-minute
> summary presentation on Day Four. These should be in the Keynote room and
> broadcast to overflow rooms as needed. No other sessions should be
> scheduled in
> conflict with them.

I also like this :)

Sounds like we need to alert in the CFP that do-sessions have this
requirement.  We should also mention that if you need more than 240 min
you should propose a "part 1" and a "part 2" and just note that both are
required (or if part 2 is optional).

regards,

bex
_______________________________________________
flock-planning mailing list -- flock-planning@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to flock-planning-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org

+1 to all of these, except the 240min do-session. That seems rather long to me, maybe 3 hours as max time is enough.