why is the website so slow?

[Jiri Eischmann]

Hi,
why is the flocktofedora.org website so slow? Response times are almost
unbearable and it's not only me who has noticed it.
> From what I understand, it runs on OpenShift. I don't have such problems

with other websites run on OpenShift.

Jiri

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 10 May 2013 10:14, Jiri Eischmann  wrote:
> Hi,
> why is the flocktofedora.org website so slow? Response times are almost
> unbearable and it's not only me who has noticed it.
> From what I understand, it runs on OpenShift. I don't have such problems
> with other websites run on OpenShift.

Why are you asking the board list? The infrastructure or the flock list
would be a better avenue. Why would the board know better?

[Tom Callaway]

On 05/10/2013 12:25 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 10 May 2013 10:14, Jiri Eischmann <[e-mail]
> > wrote:
> Hi,
> why is the flocktofedora.org <http://flocktofedora.org> website so
> slow? Response times are almost
> unbearable and it's not only me who has noticed it.
> From what I understand, it runs on OpenShift. I don't have such problems
> with other websites run on OpenShift.
>
>
> Why are you asking the board list? The infrastructure or the flock list
> would be a better avenue. Why would the board know better?

He didn't, he asked the flock-planning list. A perfectly valid place to
ask. We're looking into it.

~tom

==
Fedora Project

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 10 May 2013 10:25, Stephen John Smoogen  wrote:
> On 10 May 2013 10:14, Jiri Eischmann  wrote:
> > Hi,
> > why is the flocktofedora.org website so slow? Response times are almost
> > unbearable and it's not only me who has noticed it.
> > From what I understand, it runs on OpenShift. I don't have such problems
> > with other websites run on OpenShift.
>
> Why are you asking the board list? The infrastructure or the flock list
> would be a better avenue. Why would the board know better?

Ugh. My sincere apologies. Jiri asked the right list and I read the wrong
folder. I was wrong and should have not flown off the handle like I did. My
apologies to Jiri and everyone else.

[Kevin Fenzi]

So, I talked with openshift folks and they checked and everything
looked good from their end.

So, I poked around in the cache settings in wordpress.

Can people try it now and see if it's faster/acceptable?

kevin

[Luke Macken]

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:05:20PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, I talked with openshift folks and they checked and everything
> looked good from their end.
>
> So, I poked around in the cache settings in wordpress.
>
> Can people try it now and see if it's faster/acceptable?

It feels a little bit faster, but is still pretty sluggish.

Here is the YSlow report: http://lewk.org/flocktofedora-yslow.html

luke

[María Leandro]

Hello, sorry for my delay.

I replaced wp super-cache with w3 total-cache and seems to go better. There
were some tries to activate minify but it brought some huge problems with
the css and menus.

anyway, it should be better, cache is still being made; take a look and let
me know pls.

Remember, cache is not shown for registered users (I think not everyone has
an account there)

Thank you for the report.

2013/5/10 Luke Macken
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:05:20PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > So, I talked with openshift folks and they checked and everything
> > looked good from their end.
> >
> > So, I poked around in the cache settings in wordpress.
> >
> > Can people try it now and see if it's faster/acceptable?
>
> It feels a little bit faster, but is still pretty sluggish.
>
> Here is the YSlow report: http://lewk.org/flocktofedora-yslow.html
>
> luke
> _______________________________________________
> flock-planning mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/flock-planning

[Ruth Suehle]

Ah ha. That may explain it. It's super slow on the computer I work from,
but loads right up on one I don't often use.

On Friday, May 10, 2013, María Leandro  wrote:
> Hello, sorry for my delay.
> I replaced wp super-cache with w3 total-cache and seems to go better.

There were some tries to activate minify but it brought some huge problems
with the css and menus.
> anyway, it should be better, cache is still being made; take a look and

let me know pls.
> Remember, cache is not shown for registered users (I think not everyone

has an account there)
> Thank you for the report.
>
> 2013/5/10 Luke Macken
> > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:05:20PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > So, I talked with openshift folks and they checked and everything
> > > looked good from their end.
> > >
> > > So, I poked around in the cache settings in wordpress.
> > >
> > > Can people try it now and see if it's faster/acceptable?
> >
> > It feels a little bit faster, but is still pretty sluggish.
> >
> > Here is the YSlow report: http://lewk.org/flocktofedora-yslow.html
> >
> > luke
> > _______________________________________________
> > flock-planning mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/flock-planning
>
> --
> tatica
> Maria Gracia Leandro
> http://www.tatica.org
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:tatica
> LinuxUser= 440285  GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56

[María Leandro]

I just had to fix some minor details to the theme and cleaned up the cache
again.

thx Ruth, maybe issue is that only logged people is reporting the site
slow. Hope the new configuration helps a bit. Still digging on this side

2013/5/10 Ruth Suehle
> Ah ha. That may explain it. It's super slow on the computer I work from,
> but loads right up on one I don't often use.
>
> On Friday, May 10, 2013, María Leandro  wrote:
> > Hello, sorry for my delay.
> > I replaced wp super-cache with w3 total-cache and seems to go better.
>
> There were some tries to activate minify but it brought some huge problems
> with the css and menus.
> > anyway, it should be better, cache is still being made; take a look and
>
> let me know pls.
> > Remember, cache is not shown for registered users (I think not everyone
>
> has an account there)
> > Thank you for the report.
> >
> > 2013/5/10 Luke Macken
> > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:05:20PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > So, I talked with openshift folks and they checked and everything
> > > > looked good from their end.
> > > >
> > > > So, I poked around in the cache settings in wordpress.
> > > >
> > > > Can people try it now and see if it's faster/acceptable?
> > >
> > > It feels a little bit faster, but is still pretty sluggish.
> > >
> > > Here is the YSlow report: http://lewk.org/flocktofedora-yslow.html
> > >
> > > luke
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > flock-planning mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/flock-planning
> >
> > --
> > tatica
> > Maria Gracia Leandro
> > http://www.tatica.org
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:tatica
> > LinuxUser= 440285  GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56
>
> flock-planning mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/flock-planning