On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 06/07/2017 09:12 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 09:00:53AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> CFP closes in a week and we have 21 proposals.
>> I'm thinking we'll need to extend the CFP. How much should we extend it
by?
>
> I agree. Three weeks? That gives until July 12. I think we can make
> decisions on talks pretty quickly after it closes.
>
Well, isn't part of the issue that people need sufficient time to do the VISA
and flight-booking dance? Waiting another three weeks might make that a bit
tight. I'd suggest only two weeks, but of course that puts us right up against
US Independence Day...
From a mgmt perspective, not knowing if people have their
sessions/talks accepted makes it even harder for planning and booking
travel.
I understand the lack of submissions being an issue. That's why we
started CFP in April for the last flock, but there's nothing to be
done about that now. As a mitigation factor, you could always focus
CFP specifically on the talks, and make workshops/hackfests as a
barcamp event. That doesn't _solve_ the travel planning item I
mentioned above, but if a group can say "we're going to show up and do
X thing" without having to worry about official acceptance, at least
it makes it easier to justify.
josh