[Bug 444563] New: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563
Summary: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and
followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
When 0D2F is combined with a conjunct/consonant and followed by 0D15, instead of
conjunct/consonant combining with 0D2F, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15.
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.In gedit, type 0D07, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15,
0D3E, 0D30, 0D4D, 200D
Actual results:
When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15,
0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15
Expected results:
When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15,
0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24 should get combined with 0D2F.
Additional info:
For ref: please see the screehshot on comment #65 on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 11 months
[Bug 444559] New: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559
Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa)
in a word
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
When conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) is used in a word, the alignment is
wrong, ie, the whole word do not appear to be in one line, looks as if its in a
zig-zag shape. The vowels used with conjunct also is in wrong alignment
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. In gedit type any consonant, say 0D2C
2. Followed by, 0D4D, 0D30, 0D3F, 0D1F, 0D4D, 0D1F, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D
Actual results:
When above steps are executed, the glyph formed using 0D2C, 0D4D, 0D30,0D3F in
the above word is not in alignment with the whole word
Expected results:
The whole word must be in a single line in same alignment and with no zig-zag shape.
Additional info:
For ref: see screenshot attached on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016, in comment#65
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 11 months
[Bug 431029] New: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'à´¨àµâà´±'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431029
Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct
'ന്റ'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: high
Component: icu
AssignedTo: caolanm(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,fedora(a)leemhuis.info
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #402331 +++
Description of problem:
In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 (key 'V', key 'D', key ']'
and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct '
ന്റ ' . But the correct combination is 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (type key 'V', key
'D' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) which must give the
conjunct ന്റ.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and
key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്റ.
Actual results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and
key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്റ.
Expected results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicodes 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (or type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift
J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result must be ന്റ.
Additional info:
-- Additional comment from aalam(a)redhat.com on 2007-12-14 01:28 EST --
fonts-malayalam-2.1.5-3.fc8
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-04 01:14 EST --
Appreciate if you could let me know the status of this bug as this has to be
fixed immediately before next release.
This is a very basic but very critical bug and hence must be fixed urgently.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-04 01:14 EST --
Appreciate if you could let me know the status of this bug as this has to be
fixed immediately before next release.
This is a very basic but very critical bug and hence must be fixed urgently.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-10 02:17 EST --
Ani,this appears to be working fine in f8. Can you please confirm the problem?
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-10 04:20 EST --
Created an attachment (id=291249)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291249&action=view)
Screen shot for the conjunct combination
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 03:20 EST --
Rahul, we had a personal discussion on this bug last week. Is the issue clear
for you or do you still have any doubts?
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 07:43 EST --
Ani, thanks for the concern. The problem is absolutely clear to me. It also has
a relation the other bug about chillaksharam right now.
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 08:41 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292509)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292509&action=view)
patch for Lohit-Malayalam.sfd
This patch fixes the ligature rule in the .sfd file.
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 08:44 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292510)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292510&action=view)
fixed ttf file
Ani, can you please test this font file before I build it for fedora?
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:10 EST --
Rahul ,
I still find this is not fixed completely. Now the result is just the key
sequence when 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 is used.
Problem : 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 has to be used for getting the conjunct.
Expected result: 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 must give the desired conjunct.
Please have a look on the screenshot attached on Comment #5
Let me know if any more queries.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:22 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292624)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292624&action=view)
Screenshot of the glyph of the conjunct
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:23 EST --
Rahul ,
I still find this is not fixed completely. Now the result is just the key
sequence when 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 is used.
Problem : 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 has to be used for getting the conjunct.
Expected result: 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 must give the desired conjunct.
Please have a look on the screenshot attached on Comment #5
Let me know if any more queries.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:25 EST --
Please ignore the comment #12 as its a repetition of comment #10. Instead please
have a look in the follwing:
Rahul,
One more thing I would like to mention is that, now as the chillu is not working
anywhere, currently 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 is also not giving the conjunct. I
have already showed you the glyph of the conjunct in the font file. have
attached the same as in comment #11
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:08 EST --
Ani, from the screenshot in comment #5 attached by you, I assume you do not want
the conjunct to be formed for 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31?
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:17 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292633)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292633&action=view)
patch for Lohit-Malayalam.sfd
This patch fixes the ligature rule in sfd file.
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:17 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292634)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292634&action=view)
fixed ttf file
Ani, can you please test this font file now?
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 23:39 EST --
Rahul,
Yes, its working fine. Good job.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-25 07:04 EST --
Fixed in lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.1.8-1.fc9.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 11 months
[Bug 402331] New: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'à´¨àµâà´±'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402331
Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct
'ന്റ'
Product: Fedora
Version: fc6test3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: urgent
Component: fonts-indic
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 (key 'V', key 'D', key ']'
and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct '
ന്റ ' . But the correct combination is 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (type key 'V', key
'D' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) which must give the
conjunct ന്റ.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and
key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്റ.
Actual results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and
key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്റ.
Expected results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicodes 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (or type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift
J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result must be ന്റ.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 11 months
[Bug 402321] New: [ml_IN} Wrong combinations used for the conjunct 'à´¨àµà´ª'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402321
Summary: [ml_IN} Wrong combinations used for the conjunct
'ന്പ'
Product: Fedora
Version: fc6test3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: urgent
Component: fonts-indic
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D2A (key 'V', key 'D', key 'H' on
malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct ' ന്പ ' . But instead of 0D28
(key 'V'), it must be 0D2E (key 'C'). Hence the correct combination is 0D2E +
0D4D + 0D2A (type key 'C', key 'D', key 'H' on malayalam inscript
keyboard)which must give the conjunct ന്പ.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 0D2A (or type key 'V', key 'D', key 'H' respectively
using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്പ.
Actual results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicodes 0D28, 0D4D, 0D2A (or type key 'V', key 'D', key 'H'
respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്പ.
Expected results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicodes 0D2E, 0D4D, 0D2A (or type key 'C', key 'D', key 'H'
respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result must be ന്പ.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 11 months
[Bug 473551] New: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551
Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: rrdtool
AssignedTo: kaboom(a)oobleck.net
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: kaboom(a)oobleck.net, jwilson(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 446451
Classification: Fedora
The dejavu-fonts and dejavu-lgc-fonts packages are gone in Fedora 11.
Please change your package deps to one or several of:
dejavu-fonts-sans
dejavu-fonts-sans-mono
dejavu-fonts-serif
dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans
dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono
dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927
The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 11 months
[Bug 462531] New: text of highlighted button in dialog goes black
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: text of highlighted button in dialog goes black
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462531
Summary: text of highlighted button in dialog goes black
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jspaar(a)users.sourceforge.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
On XO running fedora rawhide livecd,
The highlighted button in a dialog (any app) looks black while the dialog
window is in focus.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
I'm not sure which underlying component is responsible. Here are candidates
chosen from zenity's dependencies:
cairo-1.7.4-1.fc10.i386
fontconfig-2.6.0-2.fc10.i386
freetype-2.3.7-1.fc10.i386
gtk2-2.14.0-4.fc10.i386
glib2-2.18.0-1.fc10.i386
libglade2-2.6.3-1.fc10.i386
glib2-2.18.0-1.fc10.i386
libgnomecanvas-2.20.1.1-2.fc9.i386
glib2-2.18.0-1.fc10.i386
gtk2-2.14.0-4.fc10.i386
pango-1.21.6-1.fc10.i386
How reproducible: always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot fedora rawhide livecd on XO per
http://katzj.livejournal.com/438184.html
2. Log in to gdm and open any dialog, such as System->shutdown
3. or run: zenity --question --text 'do you like pirate buttons?'
--ok-label='Aaargh!' --cancel-label='Naargh!'
3.
Actual results:
While the dialog window is in focus, the *text* in the highlighted button
appears blacked out. Tabbing to a different button will move the effect to
that button. Focussing on a different window will remove the effect until the
dialog is in focus again. Notice that in buttons with an icon and text, the
icon is not blacked out, only the text.
Expected results:
visible text on highlighted button while dialog window is active
Additional info:
Screenshot attached.
Intended to block FedoraOnXO Tracker:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=FedoraOnXO
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 11 months
[Bug 458169] New: implement downloadable font support on Linux
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169
Summary: implement downloadable font support on Linux
Classification: Components
Product: Core
Version: Trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: --
Component: GFX: Thebes
AssignedTo: nobody(a)mozilla.org
ReportedBy: jdaggett(a)mozilla.com
QAContact: thebes(a)gfx.bugs
CC: dbaron(a)mozilla.com, pavlov(a)pavlov.net,
blizzard(a)mozilla.com, diegoliz(a)gmail.com,
vladimir(a)pobox.com, mozilla(a)Weilbacher.org,
phiw(a)l-c-n.com, CaptainN(a)adcstudio.com,
deletesoftware(a)yandex.ru, john(a)nextraweb.com,
grfgguvf(a)gmail.com, mozbugz(a)karlt.net,
jdaggett(a)mozilla.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
jakub.rusinek(a)gmail.com
Depends on: 449356
Blocks: 70132
John Daggett (:jtd) <jdaggett(a)mozilla.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |blocking1.9.1?
As part of the work for bug 441473, support for downloable fonts was
implemented on Mac and Windows. For Linux, there's additional work required in
our Pango font code to hook into this mechanism, this is being done under bug
449356.
Once that bug is complete, the work for this includes:
* within font selection code, lookup fonts within the user font object when
appropriate
* load/unload fonts using downloaded data [src: url()]
* lookup specific font faces using the full name of a given face [src: local()]
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 1 month
[Bug 445176] New: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176
Summary: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the
pre based glyph
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph, instead
the conjunct, 0D4D and 0D30 just appear in key sequence.
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. In gedit, type 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30
Actual results:
In the above step, when 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30 is typed the conjunct
0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 is followed by 0D4D and 0D30.
Expected results:
In the above step,when 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30 is typed the conjunct
0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 must have the pre-based glyph that is formed using 0D4D
and 0D30.
Additional info:
For ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444561
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 1 month