fonts-bugs April 2008

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

20 participants
174 discussions

[Bug 439421] New: Hard to read arabic fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '09

21 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: fonts-arabic AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: swagiaal(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com The arabic font in f8 is very hard to read, I have reinstalled the package from f7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 21

[Bug 436505] New: condensed Nimbus fonts inaccessible to applications
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436505 Summary: condensed Nimbus fonts inaccessible to applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: urw-fonts AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: rdtennent(a)hotmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: The urw-fonts package includes four Type 1 fonts with FamilyName Nimbus Sans L with Condensed in the FullName. But most current applications cannot deal with Condensed, so these fonts are simply inaccessible to them. In particular, browsers like Firefox and Konqueror do not recognize them and so web authors have no way to specify them on web pages. This is unfortunate because these fonts are installed on virtually every Linux system and there is no other condensed sans font that is widely installed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.4-3 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Try to select Nimbus Sans L Condensed. 2. 3. Actual results: Can't be selected. Expected results: Can select them. Additional info: There seem to be three approaches to this problem. One is to insist that every application deal with condensed/expanded fonts in the same way that they deal with bold/italic/etc. This is a good long-term solution. A short-term solution is to hack the fonts in question so that their FamilyName is Nimbus Sans L Condensed; this has already been adopted by Mandriva and, apparently, Suse: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=367188 Another is use fontconfig to achieve the same, as in <match target="scan"> <test name="family" compare="eq"> <string>Nimbus Sans L</string> </test> <test name="width" compare="eq"> <int>75</int> </test> <edit name="family" mode="assign"> <string>Nimbus Sans L Condensed</string> </edit> </match> or variants thereof. I'll attach a simple html file which illustrates the problem. In any browser on Fedora, the two lines will be in the same fonts. When the font files are patched as suggestedb or the fontconfig snippet above installed, condensed fonts are used for the second line. ------- Additional Comments From rdtennent(a)hotmail.com 2008-03-07 11:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=297217) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=297217&action=view) Test file to illustrate inaccessibility of condensed fonts in browsers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 444240] New: freetype thinks font hrger.pfa is broken
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444240 Summary: freetype thinks font hrger.pfa is broken Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: keiths(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: The freetype library in Fedora 8 and rawhide believes that the font hrger.pfa (and related) are broken. freetype-2.1.9-6.el4 and freetype-2.2.1-19.el5 both work (/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa is identical in all cases, from the ghostscript-fonts-5.50.x packages). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): freetype-2.3.5-3.fc8 (rawhide checked, too) ghostscript-fonts-5.50-18.fc8 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. gcc `freetype-config --cflags` ft.c `freetype-config --libs` 2. run resultant executable 3. Actual results: /usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa: NO WORKY: error = 3 (error 3 is "broken file"/Ivalid_Format) Expected results: /usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa: WORKY Additional info: ------- Additional Comments From keiths(a)redhat.com 2008-04-25 18:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=303832) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=303832&action=view) testcase -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4

[Bug 433559] New: Inexact font match produces different results between i386, x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433559 Summary: Inexact font match produces different results between i386,x86_64 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: john.ellson(a)comcast.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: With dejavu and bitstream fonts installed, but freefont not installed, "fc-match freesans" (also "fc-match sans") produces a different results on i386 than on x86_64. At first I thought this caused doxygen/graphviz to generate different results on each platform which caused the file conflicts in multiarch installs. Bug #432683. It could have been, but in this case "sans" from dejavu and bitstream produce identical images. Its more likely that one of the build platfoms has freefont installed, which does produce different images. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.5.0-2.fc9 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum list 'dejavu*' 'bitstream*' 'freefont*' 2. fc-match freesans 3. Actual results: Installed Packages bitstream-vera-fonts.noarch 1.10-8 installed dejavu-fonts.noarch 2.23-1.fc9 installed dejavu-fonts-experimental.noarch 2.23-1.fc9 installed dejavu-lgc-fonts.noarch 2.23-1.fc9 installed Available Packages freefont.noarch 20060126-4.fc7 development Vera.ttf: "Bitstream Vera Sans" "Roman" <<-- x86_64 DejaVuSans.ttf: "DejaVu Sans" "Book" <<-- i386 Expected results: Same font on both architectures, given same fonts installed. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Bug 444563] New: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563 Summary: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Description of problem: When 0D2F is combined with a conjunct/consonant and followed by 0D15, instead of conjunct/consonant combining with 0D2F, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit, type 0D07, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15, 0D3E, 0D30, 0D4D, 200D Actual results: When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15 Expected results: When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24 should get combined with 0D2F. Additional info: For ref: please see the screehshot on comment #65 on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 444559] New: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Description of problem: When conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) is used in a word, the alignment is wrong, ie, the whole word do not appear to be in one line, looks as if its in a zig-zag shape. The vowels used with conjunct also is in wrong alignment How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. In gedit type any consonant, say 0D2C 2. Followed by, 0D4D, 0D30, 0D3F, 0D1F, 0D4D, 0D1F, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D Actual results: When above steps are executed, the glyph formed using 0D2C, 0D4D, 0D30,0D3F in the above word is not in alignment with the whole word Expected results: The whole word must be in a single line in same alignment and with no zig-zag shape. Additional info: For ref: see screenshot attached on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016, in comment#65 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 9

[Bug 431029] New: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'à´¨àµâà´±'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431029 Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'ന്‍റ' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: icu AssignedTo: caolanm(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list@redhat.com,fedora@leemhuis.info +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #402331 +++ Description of problem: In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 (key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct ' ന്‍റ ' . But the correct combination is 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) which must give the conjunct ന്‍റ. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്‍റ. Actual results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്‍റ. Expected results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicodes 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (or type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result must be ന്‍റ. Additional info: -- Additional comment from aalam(a)redhat.com on 2007-12-14 01:28 EST -- fonts-malayalam-2.1.5-3.fc8 -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-04 01:14 EST -- Appreciate if you could let me know the status of this bug as this has to be fixed immediately before next release. This is a very basic but very critical bug and hence must be fixed urgently. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-04 01:14 EST -- Appreciate if you could let me know the status of this bug as this has to be fixed immediately before next release. This is a very basic but very critical bug and hence must be fixed urgently. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-10 02:17 EST -- Ani,this appears to be working fine in f8. Can you please confirm the problem? -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-10 04:20 EST -- Created an attachment (id=291249) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291249&action=view) Screen shot for the conjunct combination -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 03:20 EST -- Rahul, we had a personal discussion on this bug last week. Is the issue clear for you or do you still have any doubts? Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 07:43 EST -- Ani, thanks for the concern. The problem is absolutely clear to me. It also has a relation the other bug about chillaksharam right now. -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 08:41 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292509) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292509&action=view) patch for Lohit-Malayalam.sfd This patch fixes the ligature rule in the .sfd file. -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 08:44 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292510) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292510&action=view) fixed ttf file Ani, can you please test this font file before I build it for fedora? -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:10 EST -- Rahul , I still find this is not fixed completely. Now the result is just the key sequence when 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 is used. Problem : 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 has to be used for getting the conjunct. Expected result: 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 must give the desired conjunct. Please have a look on the screenshot attached on Comment #5 Let me know if any more queries. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:22 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292624) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292624&action=view) Screenshot of the glyph of the conjunct -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:23 EST -- Rahul , I still find this is not fixed completely. Now the result is just the key sequence when 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 is used. Problem : 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 has to be used for getting the conjunct. Expected result: 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 must give the desired conjunct. Please have a look on the screenshot attached on Comment #5 Let me know if any more queries. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:25 EST -- Please ignore the comment #12 as its a repetition of comment #10. Instead please have a look in the follwing: Rahul, One more thing I would like to mention is that, now as the chillu is not working anywhere, currently 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 is also not giving the conjunct. I have already showed you the glyph of the conjunct in the font file. have attached the same as in comment #11 Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:08 EST -- Ani, from the screenshot in comment #5 attached by you, I assume you do not want the conjunct to be formed for 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31? -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:17 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292633) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292633&action=view) patch for Lohit-Malayalam.sfd This patch fixes the ligature rule in sfd file. -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:17 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292634) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292634&action=view) fixed ttf file Ani, can you please test this font file now? -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 23:39 EST -- Rahul, Yes, its working fine. Good job. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-25 07:04 EST -- Fixed in lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.1.8-1.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 9

[Bug 402331] New: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'à´¨àµâà´±'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402331 Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'ന്‍റ' Product: Fedora Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: urgent Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 (key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct ' ന്‍റ ' . But the correct combination is 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) which must give the conjunct ന്‍റ. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്‍റ. Actual results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്‍റ. Expected results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicodes 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (or type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result must be ന്‍റ. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 24

[Bug 402321] New: [ml_IN} Wrong combinations used for the conjunct 'à´¨àµà´ª'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402321 Summary: [ml_IN} Wrong combinations used for the conjunct 'ന്പ' Product: Fedora Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: urgent Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D2A (key 'V', key 'D', key 'H' on malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct ' ന്പ ' . But instead of 0D28 (key 'V'), it must be 0D2E (key 'C'). Hence the correct combination is 0D2E + 0D4D + 0D2A (type key 'C', key 'D', key 'H' on malayalam inscript keyboard)which must give the conjunct ന്പ. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 0D2A (or type key 'V', key 'D', key 'H' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്പ. Actual results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicodes 0D28, 0D4D, 0D2A (or type key 'V', key 'D', key 'H' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്പ. Expected results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicodes 0D2E, 0D4D, 0D2A (or type key 'C', key 'D', key 'H' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result must be ന്പ. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 15

[Bug 428427] New: [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 Summary: [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: svenkate(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-bugs- list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: When tested with the fonts-kannada-2.1.5-2.fc8 the 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-kannada-2.1.5-2.fc8 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1.Activate the SCIM 2.open any editor 3.Key-in 0CB5+0CCA,vo(itrans),or b`(inscript) Actual results: As shown in the attachment Expected results: As shown in the attachment Additional info: Similar kind of issue (ವೋ :: 0CB5 + 0CCB) was raised in the bug #223945(comment #3), which may help to solve this wrong liguture rule ------- Additional Comments From svenkate(a)redhat.com 2008-01-11 08:23 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291385) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291385&action=view) Actual and correct results with key sequence to reproduce -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 13

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs April 2008