May 2008 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing

by mbayer＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from mbayer(a)openoffice.org Fri May 16 23:43:11 +0000 2008 ------- mbayer->ousia: As you can deduce from this issue's target milestone “OOo Later”, the feature requested won't be available in one of OOo's releases in the near future. For further inquiries, please contact the dev(a)gsl.openoffice.org mailing list. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing

by ousia＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from ousia(a)openoffice.org Fri May 16 17:40:37 +0000 2008 ------- PDF export and printing of PostScript fonts would be an interesting feature to have on version 3. Will this feature be available in version 3? Thanks, Pablo --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 55986] impossible to paste text with diacritic symbols - regression

by macias＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55986 ------- Additional comments from macias(a)openoffice.org Fri May 16 13:11:09 +0000 2008 ------- Works for me (KDE3.5.9 + OO2.4.0). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 358001] warning of missing pango.modules during yum update - multilib ?

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: warning of missing pango.modules during yum update - multilib ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=358001 dtimms(a)iinet.net.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |pango-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dtimms(a)iinet.net.au 2008-05-15 09:45 EST ------- Currently on F9, with pango-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386. yum reinstall pango, did not show the above error. rpm -e pango --nodeps, yum install pango, did not show the above error. Closing as current release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 431355] oowriter .odt - Nimbus Roman No9 L linespacing seems to be changed

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: oowriter .odt - Nimbus Roman No9 L linespacing seems to be changed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431355 fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-triage- | |list(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com 2008-05-14 11:18 EST ------- This message is a reminder that Fedora 7 is nearing the end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 7. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '7'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 7's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 7 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. If possible, it is recommended that you try the newest available Fedora distribution to see if your bug still exists. Please read the Release Notes for the newest Fedora distribution to make sure it will meet your needs: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 358001] warning of missing pango.modules during yum update - multilib ?

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: warning of missing pango.modules during yum update - multilib ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=358001 bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|f7 |7 fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-triage- | |list(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com 2008-05-14 10:55 EST ------- This message is a reminder that Fedora 7 is nearing the end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 7. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '7'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 7's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 7 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. If possible, it is recommended that you try the newest available Fedora distribution to see if your bug still exists. Please read the Release Notes for the newest Fedora distribution to make sure it will meet your needs: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently

by mru＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 ------- Additional comments from mru(a)openoffice.org Tue May 13 10:57:47 +0000 2008 ------- *** Issue 89380 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitmap-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 tcallawa(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa(a)redhat.com 2008-05-12 15:04 EST ------- Lucida fonts are acceptable. If we modify the fonts in any way, we'll need to stop using the Lucida trademarks (similar to Bitstream Vera). The fixfonts appear to have come from KDE3's "konsole" application, and are licensed as GPLv2 (http://websvn.kde.org/tags/KDE/3.5.9/kdebase/konsole/). Use License: GPLv2 and Lucida Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 230662] Faulty text-wrapping for Asian languages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Faulty text-wrapping for Asian languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230662 ------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2008-05-11 21:01 EST ------- (I think the same is true for xchat (bug 132527).) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 230662] Faulty text-wrapping for Asian languages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Faulty text-wrapping for Asian languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230662 ------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2008-05-11 21:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Unless it is can be reproduced in gedit or pidgin, it's a xchat-gnome bug. Well the point is it is fixed in F9 and the current version of xchat-gnome in F8 is the same... so it can't be xchat-gnome? I still suspect pango or maybe some fontconfig changes? Perhaps we should just close it nextrelease? ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs May 2008