fonts-bugs May 2008

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

22 participants
126 discussions

[Bug 441995] New: [mai_IN] fc-list does not show Maithili language name
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '08

05 May '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441995 Summary: [mai_IN] fc-list does not show Maithili language name Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-bugs- list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Description of problem: fc-list does not list Maithili language. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.5.0-2.fc9.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.fc-list :lang=mai 2. 3. Actual results: Maithili language not listed. Expected results: fc-list should list Maithili Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Bug 444561] New: [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '08

05 May '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444561 Summary: [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Description of problem: Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph, instead the conjunct, 0D4D and 0D30 just appear in key sequence. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. In gedit, type 0D1A,0D28,0D4D, 0D26, 0D4D, 0D30, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D Actual results: In the above step, when 0D28,0D4D, 0D26, 0D4D, 0D30 is typed the conjunct formed using 0D28,0D4D, 0D26 is followed by 0D4D and 0D30. Expected results: In the above step, when 0D28,0D4D, 0D26, 0D4D, 0D30 is typed the conjunct formed using 0D28,0D4D, 0D26 must have the pre-based glyph that is formed using 0D4D and 0D30. Additional info: For ref: please see the screehshot on comment #65 on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 10

[Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering
by mox＠openoffice.org 04 May '08

04 May '08

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 User mox changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |53363) WIP4 - on par with | |VCL, except some issues wi | |th logical advancements -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from mox(a)openoffice.org Sun May 4 18:58:50 +0000 2008 ------- Created an attachment (id=53363) WIP4 - on par with VCL, except some issues with logical advancements --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Bug 427956] New: fontconfig-devel.x86_64 conflicts with fontconfig-devel.i386
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 May '08

03 May '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427956 Summary: fontconfig-devel.x86_64 conflicts with fontconfig- devel.i386 Product: Fedora Version: 7 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: hejian.he(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ yum list fontconfig-devel Installed Packages fontconfig-devel.i386 2.4.2-3.fc7 installed Available Packages fontconfig-devel.x86_64 2.4.2-3.fc7 fedora How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install fontconfig-devel 2. 3. Actual results: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/doc/fontconfig-devel-2.4.2/fontconfig-devel.txt from install of fontconfig-devel-2.4.2-3.fc7 conflicts with file from package fontconfig-devel-2.4.2-3.fc7 Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 03 May '08

03 May '08

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 Dave Townsend (Mossop) <dtownsend(a)mozilla.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vedant(a)lath.in --- Comment #81 from Dave Townsend (Mossop) <dtownsend(a)mozilla.com> 2008-05-03 08:26:51 PDT --- *** Bug 432008 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 426776] Cursor navigation behaviour is unexpected during Delete composed character with Backspace key
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 May '08

01 May '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Cursor navigation behaviour is unexpected during Delete composed character with Backspace key https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426776 Bug 426776 depends on bug 411611, which changed state. Bug 411611 Summary: [indic] Cursor navigation behaviour is unexpected during Delete composed character with Backspace key https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411611 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs May 2008