Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: fonts-arabic
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: swagiaal(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
The arabic font in f8 is very hard to read, I have reinstalled the package from f7.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436505
Summary: condensed Nimbus fonts inaccessible to applications
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: urw-fonts
AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: rdtennent(a)hotmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
The urw-fonts package includes four Type 1 fonts with FamilyName Nimbus Sans L
with Condensed in the FullName. But most current applications cannot deal with
Condensed, so these fonts are simply inaccessible to them. In particular,
browsers like Firefox and Konqueror do not recognize them and so web authors
have no way to specify them on web pages. This is unfortunate because these
fonts are installed on virtually every Linux system and there is no other
condensed sans font that is widely installed.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.4-3
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Try to select Nimbus Sans L Condensed.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Can't be selected.
Expected results:
Can select them.
Additional info:
There seem to be three approaches to this problem. One is to insist that every
application deal with condensed/expanded fonts in the same way that they deal
with bold/italic/etc. This is a good long-term solution. A short-term solution
is to hack the fonts in question so that their FamilyName is Nimbus Sans L
Condensed; this has already been adopted by Mandriva and, apparently, Suse:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=367188
Another is use fontconfig to achieve the same, as in
<match target="scan">
<test name="family" compare="eq">
<string>Nimbus Sans L</string>
</test>
<test name="width" compare="eq">
<int>75</int>
</test>
<edit name="family" mode="assign">
<string>Nimbus Sans L Condensed</string>
</edit>
</match>
or variants thereof.
I'll attach a simple html file which illustrates the problem. In any browser on
Fedora, the two lines will be in the same fonts. When the font files are
patched as suggestedb or the fontconfig snippet above installed, condensed fonts
are used for the second line.
------- Additional Comments From rdtennent(a)hotmail.com 2008-03-07 11:58 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=297217)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=297217&action=view)
Test file to illustrate inaccessibility of condensed fonts in browsers.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444240
Summary: freetype thinks font hrger.pfa is broken
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: freetype
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: keiths(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
The freetype library in Fedora 8 and rawhide believes that the font hrger.pfa
(and related) are broken. freetype-2.1.9-6.el4 and freetype-2.2.1-19.el5 both
work (/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa is identical in all cases,
from the ghostscript-fonts-5.50.x packages).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
freetype-2.3.5-3.fc8 (rawhide checked, too)
ghostscript-fonts-5.50-18.fc8
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. gcc `freetype-config --cflags` ft.c `freetype-config --libs`
2. run resultant executable
3.
Actual results:
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa: NO WORKY: error = 3
(error 3 is "broken file"/Ivalid_Format)
Expected results:
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa: WORKY
Additional info:
------- Additional Comments From keiths(a)redhat.com 2008-04-25 18:34 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=303832)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=303832&action=view)
testcase
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433559
Summary: Inexact font match produces different results between
i386,x86_64
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: john.ellson(a)comcast.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
With dejavu and bitstream fonts installed, but freefont not installed, "fc-match
freesans" (also "fc-match sans") produces a different results on i386 than on
x86_64.
At first I thought this caused doxygen/graphviz to generate different results on
each platform which caused the file conflicts in multiarch installs. Bug
#432683. It could have been, but in this case "sans" from dejavu and bitstream
produce identical images. Its more likely that one of the build platfoms has
freefont installed, which does produce different images.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.5.0-2.fc9
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum list 'dejavu*' 'bitstream*' 'freefont*'
2. fc-match freesans
3.
Actual results:
Installed Packages
bitstream-vera-fonts.noarch 1.10-8 installed
dejavu-fonts.noarch 2.23-1.fc9 installed
dejavu-fonts-experimental.noarch 2.23-1.fc9 installed
dejavu-lgc-fonts.noarch 2.23-1.fc9 installed
Available Packages
freefont.noarch 20060126-4.fc7 development
Vera.ttf: "Bitstream Vera Sans" "Roman" <<-- x86_64
DejaVuSans.ttf: "DejaVu Sans" "Book" <<-- i386
Expected results:
Same font on both architectures, given same fonts installed.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563
Summary: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and
followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com
Description of problem:
When 0D2F is combined with a conjunct/consonant and followed by 0D15, instead of
conjunct/consonant combining with 0D2F, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15.
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.In gedit, type 0D07, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15,
0D3E, 0D30, 0D4D, 200D
Actual results:
When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15,
0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15
Expected results:
When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15,
0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24 should get combined with 0D2F.
Additional info:
For ref: please see the screehshot on comment #65 on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559
Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa)
in a word
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com
Description of problem:
When conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) is used in a word, the alignment is
wrong, ie, the whole word do not appear to be in one line, looks as if its in a
zig-zag shape. The vowels used with conjunct also is in wrong alignment
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. In gedit type any consonant, say 0D2C
2. Followed by, 0D4D, 0D30, 0D3F, 0D1F, 0D4D, 0D1F, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D
Actual results:
When above steps are executed, the glyph formed using 0D2C, 0D4D, 0D30,0D3F in
the above word is not in alignment with the whole word
Expected results:
The whole word must be in a single line in same alignment and with no zig-zag shape.
Additional info:
For ref: see screenshot attached on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016, in comment#65
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431029
Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct
'ന്റ'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: high
Component: icu
AssignedTo: caolanm(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,fedora@leemhuis.info
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #402331 +++
Description of problem:
In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 (key 'V', key 'D', key ']'
and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct '
ന്റ ' . But the correct combination is 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (type key 'V', key
'D' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) which must give the
conjunct ന്റ.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and
key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്റ.
Actual results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and
key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്റ.
Expected results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicodes 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (or type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift
J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result must be ന്റ.
Additional info:
-- Additional comment from aalam(a)redhat.com on 2007-12-14 01:28 EST --
fonts-malayalam-2.1.5-3.fc8
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-04 01:14 EST --
Appreciate if you could let me know the status of this bug as this has to be
fixed immediately before next release.
This is a very basic but very critical bug and hence must be fixed urgently.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-04 01:14 EST --
Appreciate if you could let me know the status of this bug as this has to be
fixed immediately before next release.
This is a very basic but very critical bug and hence must be fixed urgently.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-10 02:17 EST --
Ani,this appears to be working fine in f8. Can you please confirm the problem?
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-10 04:20 EST --
Created an attachment (id=291249)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291249&action=view)
Screen shot for the conjunct combination
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 03:20 EST --
Rahul, we had a personal discussion on this bug last week. Is the issue clear
for you or do you still have any doubts?
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 07:43 EST --
Ani, thanks for the concern. The problem is absolutely clear to me. It also has
a relation the other bug about chillaksharam right now.
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 08:41 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292509)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292509&action=view)
patch for Lohit-Malayalam.sfd
This patch fixes the ligature rule in the .sfd file.
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 08:44 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292510)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292510&action=view)
fixed ttf file
Ani, can you please test this font file before I build it for fedora?
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:10 EST --
Rahul ,
I still find this is not fixed completely. Now the result is just the key
sequence when 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 is used.
Problem : 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 has to be used for getting the conjunct.
Expected result: 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 must give the desired conjunct.
Please have a look on the screenshot attached on Comment #5
Let me know if any more queries.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:22 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292624)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292624&action=view)
Screenshot of the glyph of the conjunct
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:23 EST --
Rahul ,
I still find this is not fixed completely. Now the result is just the key
sequence when 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 is used.
Problem : 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 has to be used for getting the conjunct.
Expected result: 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 must give the desired conjunct.
Please have a look on the screenshot attached on Comment #5
Let me know if any more queries.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:25 EST --
Please ignore the comment #12 as its a repetition of comment #10. Instead please
have a look in the follwing:
Rahul,
One more thing I would like to mention is that, now as the chillu is not working
anywhere, currently 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 is also not giving the conjunct. I
have already showed you the glyph of the conjunct in the font file. have
attached the same as in comment #11
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:08 EST --
Ani, from the screenshot in comment #5 attached by you, I assume you do not want
the conjunct to be formed for 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31?
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:17 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292633)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292633&action=view)
patch for Lohit-Malayalam.sfd
This patch fixes the ligature rule in sfd file.
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:17 EST --
Created an attachment (id=292634)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292634&action=view)
fixed ttf file
Ani, can you please test this font file now?
-- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 23:39 EST --
Rahul,
Yes, its working fine. Good job.
Thanks
Ani
-- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-25 07:04 EST --
Fixed in lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.1.8-1.fc9.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402331
Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct
'ന്റ'
Product: Fedora
Version: fc6test3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: urgent
Component: fonts-indic
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 (key 'V', key 'D', key ']'
and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct '
ന്റ ' . But the correct combination is 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (type key 'V', key
'D' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) which must give the
conjunct ന്റ.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and
key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്റ.
Actual results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and
key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്റ.
Expected results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicodes 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (or type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift
J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result must be ന്റ.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402321
Summary: [ml_IN} Wrong combinations used for the conjunct
'ന്പ'
Product: Fedora
Version: fc6test3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: urgent
Component: fonts-indic
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D2A (key 'V', key 'D', key 'H' on
malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct ' ന്പ ' . But instead of 0D28
(key 'V'), it must be 0D2E (key 'C'). Hence the correct combination is 0D2E +
0D4D + 0D2A (type key 'C', key 'D', key 'H' on malayalam inscript
keyboard)which must give the conjunct ന്പ.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 0D2A (or type key 'V', key 'D', key 'H' respectively
using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്പ.
Actual results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicodes 0D28, 0D4D, 0D2A (or type key 'V', key 'D', key 'H'
respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result is ന്പ.
Expected results:
1.Open gedit/kedit.
2.Type unicodes 0D2E, 0D4D, 0D2A (or type key 'C', key 'D', key 'H'
respectively using Malayalam Inscript).
3.Result must be ന്പ.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176
Summary: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the
pre based glyph
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com
Description of problem:
Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph, instead
the conjunct, 0D4D and 0D30 just appear in key sequence.
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. In gedit, type 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30
Actual results:
In the above step, when 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30 is typed the conjunct
0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 is followed by 0D4D and 0D30.
Expected results:
In the above step,when 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30 is typed the conjunct
0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 must have the pre-based glyph that is formed using 0D4D
and 0D30.
Additional info:
For ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444561
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.