fonts-bugs May 2008

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

22 participants
126 discussions

[Bug 448289] [ro] Fonts in distribution contains incorrect glyphs for Romanian language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 May '08

28 May '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ro] Fonts in distribution contains incorrect glyphs for Romanian language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448289 ------- Additional Comments From razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro 2008-05-28 14:01 EST ------- Sorry, maybe I've generated the PDF in a wrong way (because the patch for the keyboard is not in Fedora yet). However, the base problem remains: When the patch for the keyboard will be included in Fedora, Romanian writers will want to insert the correct glyphs in their documents, i.e. the comma-below characters. And the majority of fonts I've seend don't have these. Also: - (scenario 1) at install time, if Romanian language is selected during installation, anaconda should use a default system font which has the correct Romanian glyphs (in /etc/sysconfig/i18n). - (scenario 2) after installation, if system-config-language is used to switch to Romanian language (from whatever language was used before), system-config-language should set a font that contains the correct Romanian glyphs (comma-below). Regards, Răzvan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 143364] Lack of unicode normalisation in search
by Nicolas Mailhot 28 May '08

28 May '08

------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143364 nicolas.mailhot laposte net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list redhat com

1 0

[Bug 95043] GTK doesn't deal well with arbitrarily named font styles
by gnome-control-center (bugzilla.gnome.org) 28 May '08

28 May '08

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95043 pango | general | Ver: 1.1.x Tomáš Znamenáček changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zoul(a)fleuron.cz ------- Comment #17 from Tomáš Znamenáček 2008-05-28 14:05 UTC ------- Having more than the four traditional styles is a feature described in the OpenType specification, see http://www.microsoft.com/OpenType/OTSpec/name.htm: “For historical reasons, font families have contained a maximum of four styles, but font designers may group more than four fonts to a single family. The Preferred Family allows font designers to include the preferred family grouping which contains more than four fonts. This ID is only present if it is different from ID 1.” Many fonts use this feature. -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95043.

1 0

[Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback)
by hdu＠openoffice.org 28 May '08

28 May '08

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ IssuesThisDependsOn| |74754 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

rpms/edrip-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 edrip-fonts.spec, 1.6, 1.7 sources, 1.4, 1.5
by nim 26 May '08

26 May '08

Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13363/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore edrip-fonts.spec sources Log Message: new version with bold italic Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- .cvsignore 18 May 2008 14:08:57 -0000 1.4 +++ .cvsignore 26 May 2008 20:25:19 -0000 1.5 @@ -1 +1 @@ -edrip-src-20080515.tar.bz2 +edrip-src-20080523.tar.bz2 Index: edrip-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/edrip-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- edrip-fonts.spec 18 May 2008 14:22:08 -0000 1.6 +++ edrip-fonts.spec 26 May 2008 20:25:19 -0000 1.7 @@ -5,17 +5,17 @@ %define archivename %{fontname}-src-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20080515 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 20080523 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Edrip decorative font -Group: User Interface/X -License: OFL -URL: ftp://ftp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/%{name}/ -Source0: %{url}/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 -Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf +Group: User Interface/X +License: OFL +URL: ftp://ftp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/%{name}/ +Source0: %{url}/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 +Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf -Patch0: edrip-fonts-license.patch +Patch0: edrip-fonts-license.patch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch @@ -33,14 +33,14 @@ %patch0 -p1 %build -make %{?_smp_mflags} Edrip-Regular.ttf Edrip-Bold.ttf Edrip-Italic.ttf +make %{?_smp_mflags} all %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -install -m 0644 -p Edrip-Regular.ttf Edrip-Bold.ttf Edrip-Italic.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p Edrip-*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf @@ -73,6 +73,11 @@ %changelog +* Mon May 26 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> +- 20080523-1 +ϡ Add bold italic typeface to the font package +Ք Use new upstream makefile magic to simplify spec + * Sun May 18 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> - 20080515-2 ⦬ Add bold & italic typeface to the font package Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- sources 18 May 2008 14:08:57 -0000 1.4 +++ sources 26 May 2008 20:25:19 -0000 1.5 @@ -1 +1 @@ -b404aa486651ac9dcf002dda7e49d6fa edrip-src-20080515.tar.bz2 +e370ad776b3f98fe638e164935c00fb0 edrip-src-20080523.tar.bz2

1 0

[Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 26 May '08

26 May '08

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 Mike Shaver <shaver(a)mozilla.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shaver(a)mozilla.org --- Comment #82 from Mike Shaver <shaver(a)mozilla.org> 2008-05-26 12:03:38 PDT --- The comment here no longer reflects reality, since we're not finding the nearest multiple of 96 any more. Dunno if anyone cares about that? Vlad believes that we should #ifdef MOZ_WIDGET_GTK2 around this and return other platforms to their behaviour from before this change, to remedy bug 434157. I have no reason to disagree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 448289] [ro] Fonts in distribution contains incorrect glyphs for Romanian language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '08

25 May '08

1 0

[Bug 448289] [ro] Fonts in distribution contains incorrect glyphs for Romanian language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '08

25 May '08

1 0

[Issue 88583] AutoCorrection changes Font
by sba＠openoffice.org 23 May '08

23 May '08

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88583 User sba changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from sba(a)openoffice.org Fri May 23 14:31:15 +0000 2008 ------- Verified in CWS extrasso9. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Bug 230662] Faulty text-wrapping for Asian languages
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '08

22 May '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Faulty text-wrapping for Asian languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230662 petersen(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|besfahbo(a)redhat.com |bdpepple(a)gmail.com Version|8 |9 ------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2008-05-22 02:12 EST ------- Actually I was wrong: well it seems ok for Japanese for me, but in Chinese locale zh_CN.UTF-8 I still see the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
13
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs May 2008