Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434409
Summary: fonttools failed massrebuild attempt for GCC 4.3
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: fonttools
AssignedTo: roozbeh(a)farsiweb.info
ReportedBy: jkeating(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
This is an automatically filed bug for a failed rebuild attempt for GCC 4.3.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating/gcc43MassRebuildProposal
Please verify why this build failed and fix it.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=444470
Exit code was 1, check the build.log for the failed buildArch task.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434251
Summary: alfont failed massrebuild attempt for GCC 4.3
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: alfont
AssignedTo: j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl
ReportedBy: jkeating(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
This is an automatically filed bug for a failed rebuild attempt for GCC 4.3.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating/gcc43MassRebuildProposal
Please verify why this build failed and fix it.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=440636
Unknown exit code, check the failed task.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=367791
Summary: remove 59-liberation-fonts.conf
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
fontconfig-2.4.92-1 that I'm just building contains all the configuration done
in 59-liberation-fonts.conf, and much more to make liberation-fonts useful.
Please remove that file for F9.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444392
Summary: Task: Convert liberation-fonts into a open source font
project.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
URL: https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-bugs-
list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Convert liberation-fonts into a open source font project, by means of migration
from TTF to SFD format, rework on the RPM package, host publicly on
fedorahosted.org, etc.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
liberation-fonts-1.03-1
How reproducible:
N/A
Steps to Reproduce:
N/A
Actual results:
N/A
Expected results:
N/A
Additional info:
https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992
Summary: Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for
Romanian language
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
URL: http://www.secarica.ro
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-
list@redhat.com,marius.stracna@mobexpert.ro
Description of problem:
When used on a system configured for Romanian language, liberation-fonts
generates wrong characters:
- "T with cedilla below" (Unicode 0162) instead of "T with comma below" (Unicode
021A)
- "t with cedilla below" (Unicode 0163) instead of "t with comma below" (Unicode
021B)
- "S with cedilla below" (Unicode 015E) instead of "S with comma below" (Unicode
0218)
- "s with cedilla below" (Unicode 015F) instead of "s with comma below" (Unicode
0219)
For non-Romanian developers: there is no such thing as „cedilla-below”
characters in Romanian language; please see http://www.secarica.ro
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
liberation-fonts.noarch 0:1.0-4.fc9
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install latest Fedora (development)
2. Configure it for Romanian language
3. Open a new text document in OpenOffice.org
4. Press AltGr+s and AltGr+t (and Shift for capitals) to insert the specific
Romanian characters.
Actual results:
Characters with cedilla below are inserted in the document.
Expected results:
Characters with comma below should be inserted.
Additional info:
This is a historical bug for Romanian language implementations, still not solved .
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450061
Summary: [ro] Create (U+0218..021B,2011) in Liberation Fonts.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
URL: http://www.secarica.ro
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: kbd
AssignedTo: vcrhonek(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: alexxed@gmail.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,marius.stracna@mobexpert.ro
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #440992 +++
Description of problem:
Glyph request on the codepoint:
- "T with comma below" (Unicode 021A)
- "t with comma below" (Unicode 021B)
- "S with comma below" (Unicode 0218)
- "s with comma below" (Unicode 0219)
- HYPHEN, U+2010
- NON-BREAKING HYPHEN, U+2011
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kbd-1.12-31.fc9.i386
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install latest Fedora (development)
2. Configure it for Romanian language
3. Go to console by Alt-F1 (not GUI terminals)
4. Press AltGr+s and AltGr+t (and Shift for capitals) to insert the specific
Romanian characters.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Characters mentioned should be inserted.
Additional info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992
-- Additional comment from razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro on 2008-06-04 02:52 EST --
Hello, Caius & all,
When system is set to Romanian (by anaconda, at install time or via
system-config-language, afterwards), in /etc/sysconfig/i18n we get a line:
SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16"
Caius, please, do you know from which .rpm package these default fonts come from ?
We must file & resolve a bug regarding the comma/cedilla issue for these default
fonts and I don't know where to adress it, exactly.
This is extremely important, since the "latarcyrheb-sun16" is the first thing
that system "sees" after boot and we've already got some crashes due to
incorrect encoding. In some situations, some programs (including anaconda)
worked OK when set to English, but tracebacks occured when set to Romanian.
Thanks a lot,
Răzvan
-- Additional comment from cchance(a)redhat.com on 2008-06-04 03:41 EST --
Hi Răzvan,
(In reply to comment #20)
Hmm, it looks quite serious, doesn't it?
It's belonged to 'kbd' package in recent Fedora. Please feel free to file
another bug on that package for requesting supports on the issues you kindly
discovered.
Cheers, Caius.
-- Additional comment from alexxed(a)gmail.com on 2008-06-04 05:36 EST --
(In reply to comment #20)
> Hello, Caius & all,
>
> When system is set to Romanian (by anaconda, at install time or via
> system-config-language, afterwards), in /etc/sysconfig/i18n we get a line:
>
> SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16"
>
Are you sure? I've installed Fedora 9 i386 and x86_64 several times and
/etc/sysconfig/i18n looks like this:
LANG="ro_RO.UTF-8"
SYSFONT="Lat2-Terminus16"
I did use the graphical installer all the time. It may be only in text mode,
I'll test this.
Meantime here's a list of related bugs where this was addressed:
- comments 23 and 24 in bug 253892
- bug list:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?version=&component=anaconda&bug_sta…
before opening a new bug.
-- Additional comment from razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro on 2008-06-04 07:48 EST --
Sorry, my fault !
All systems I have at hand, running F9, were *upgraded* from F8, not fresh
installs. So Terminus is now, in F9, the default font when setting system to
Romanian ?
However:
- changing the default font is just a temporary solution, IMHO.
"latarcyrheb-sun16" should also include the correct glyphs for the Romanian
language;
- when upgrading a (*Romanian*) system from F8 to F9, why don't we change that
line in /etc/sysconfig/i18n during the upgrade itself ? Is that the correct
behaviour ?
- as for the keyboard configurator (system-config-keyboard, in both X and text
mode), it seems it dissapeared from the System menu, in F9. And I see no
replacement for it...
Regards,
Răzvan
-- Additional comment from razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro on 2008-06-04 07:51 EST --
Regarding comment #23, probably the correct behaviour at point no. 2 is to leave
that line alone, but have the correct glyphs in "latarcyrheb-sun16" ;-)
Regards,
Răzvan
-- Additional comment from alexxed(a)gmail.com on 2008-06-04 08:00 EST --
(In reply to comment #23)
> Sorry, my fault !
>
> All systems I have at hand, running F9, were *upgraded* from F8, not fresh
> installs. So Terminus is now, in F9, the default font when setting system to
> Romanian ?
Yes, it was the quick solution.
>
>
> However:
>
> - changing the default font is just a temporary solution, IMHO.
> "latarcyrheb-sun16" should also include the correct glyphs for the Romanian
> language;
I head that Fedora is planning to convert the X fonts to terminal fonts and drop
all the terminal fonts, so maybe it's worth investigating this first.
>
> - when upgrading a (*Romanian*) system from F8 to F9, why don't we change that
> line in /etc/sysconfig/i18n during the upgrade itself ? Is that the correct
> behaviour ?
I'm afraid so, rpm upgrade keeps existing configuration.
>
> - as for the keyboard configurator (system-config-keyboard, in both X and text
> mode), it seems it dissapeared from the System menu, in F9. And I see no
> replacement for it...
Search bugzilla or ask in the mailing list what plans are there for
system-config-keyboard and system-config-language in the future.
Here is a link: http://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/ that you can use to
find out where to report a bug to a component. Click on the module you want and
see a link to report a bug
-- Additional comment from nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net on 2008-06-04 08:11 EST --
(In reply to comment #25)
> (In reply to comment #23)
> > However:
> >
> > - changing the default font is just a temporary solution, IMHO.
> > "latarcyrheb-sun16" should also include the correct glyphs for the Romanian
> > language;
>
> I head that Fedora is planning to convert the X fonts to terminal fonts and drop
> all the terminal fonts, so maybe it's worth investigating this first.
As far as I know what's planned is conversion of X keyboard layouts to console
layouts. I doubt converting complex vector TTF/OTF fonts to dumb bitmap console
fonts is possible without major human involvment.
-- Additional comment from cchance(a)redhat.com on 2008-06-04 20:38 EST --
FYI, The font Alexandru mentioned is also within same console font package:
$ rpm -qf /lib/kbd/consolefonts/Lat2-Terminus16.psf.gz
kbd-1.12-31.fc9.i386
I agree Nicolas about converting complex vector TTF/OTF fonts to dumb bitmap
console fonts. Even if the TTF/OTF embedded bitmap glyphs, font style
consistency/readability might also be an issue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510
Summary: Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia
Product: Fedora
Version: 9
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: beland(a)alum.mit.edu
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
I did a fresh installation of Fedora 9 using the network install method and
adding Office/Productivity software in addition to the default set. I'm seeing
undisplayable glyphs on the following pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuation#Unicodehttp://www.wikipedia.org/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenician_alphabet#Encoding
I would expect a default installation to be able to display all glyphs that
appear in Wikipedia, so that readers can learn about them. Many non-English
glyphs, even fairly obscure ones, are displayed properly, which is excellent.
It would be nice to finish off the rest. I don't know if this is a flaw in
Pango, if I would need to install additional font RPMs, or something else.
This is with firefox-3.0-1.fc9.i386 and pango-1.20.4-1.fc9.i386.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444281
Summary: Provides: freetype2-devel
Product: Fedora
Version: 8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: freetype
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: ed(a)membled.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
It would be handy if the freetype-devel package had Provides: freetype2-devel
for compatibility with other rpm-based distros.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391191
Summary: wrong verify options in rpm package for fonts.dir
Product: Fedora
Version: f8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: fonts-KOI8-R
AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: chkr(a)plauener.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
the integrity check for the fonts-KOI8-R-* packages reports modified files:
"rpm -V fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-10.fc8 fonts-KOI8-R-100dpi-1.0-10.fc8
fonts-KOI8-R-75dpi-1.0-10.fc8":
S.5....T /usr/share/fonts/KOI8-R/misc/fonts.dir
S.5....T /usr/share/fonts/KOI8-R/100dpi/fonts.dir
S.5....T /usr/share/fonts/KOI8-R/75dpi/fonts.dir
Although this is not a big problem, rpm -V should not report changes in files
which are changed automatically on purpose (like fonts.dir, ...).
Other font packages have solved the problem e.g. using something like this in
the %files section (
%{fontdir}/*.ttf
%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir
%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
e.g. fonts-KOI8-R-100dpi-1.0-10.fc8
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=370441
Summary: subpixel on by default?
Product: Fedora
Version: f8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: dwinship(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
I've noticed various places using subpixel hinting in F8:
- the installer
- the graphical boot screen
- gdm
(I've noticed, because they're using the wrong RGB ordering for my monitor, and
so it looks awful.)
I'm assuming that none of these apps are doing it on purpose, and that the
problem is just with the default settings. (And then once I log in, everything
is fine, because GNOME overrides the defaults.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.