July 2008 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 447298] Qt 4 uses Nimbus Sans L (Helvetica) instead of DejaVu Sans (Sans Serif)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Qt 4 uses Nimbus Sans L (Helvetica) instead of DejaVu Sans (Sans Serif) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447298 ------- Additional Comments From updates(a)fedoraproject.org 2008-07-26 01:56 EST ------- qt-4.3.4-14.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 78749] some Latin text needs CTL processing

by hdu＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78749 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Target milestone|OOo 3.0 |OOo 3.x -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu(a)openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 14:26:24 +0000 2008 ------- target --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing

by burmashave＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from burmashave(a)openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 14:25:48 +0000 2008 ------- Thanks for announcing the milestone, hdu! Thanks to all the dev's, etc. who are moving this forward. We appreciate it very much. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com 2008-07-25 09:19 EST ------- Neither of those URLs work.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net 2008-07-25 09:12 EST ------- Looking at it a bit more, the TTF file size is 3 times the OTF file so the last one is probably incomplete. Package the TTF file (sorry) Also you can use %setup. The gfs fonts only use unzip directly because GFS releases fonts in a weird Apple zip variant %setup can not cope with So just: 1. revert to a simple package 2. that only includes the TTF file 3. and uses %setup 4. and take care of your missing wiki page and I'll approve the whole lot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net 2008-07-25 09:01 EST ------- I'll start the review process now but since I'll be unavailable till september in a few days someone else will probably have to finish it (or you'll have to wait or be very reactive) 1. Please make sure you've done all the steps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#2.a and in particular the wiki-related ones http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Gentium_Basic_fonts 2. Gentium Basic is OFL, not GPL 3. Its homepage is http://scripts.sil.org/Gentium_Basic 4. Please make sure to touch the txt files so your recoding does not change their timestamp each time you rebuild them (look at one of the gfs fonts specs for example) 5. please use sil-gentium-basic-fonts as package name 6. for fedora versions ≥ 9 you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache 7. You can flesh up your description a bit. You can take inspiration from Debian's packaging http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&forma... 8. Since the font is effectively a limited Gentium with more faces, you need to teach fontconfig to substitute it to Gentium (and the Gentium packager will need to do it the other way). Look how it's done for dejavu and dejavu lgc, that's just a little fontconfig file to add -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 36535] Impossible to enter non italic greek characters

by nmailhot＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36535 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'ih' |'fedorafonts,ih' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from nmailhot(a)openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 12:17:04 +0000 2008 ------- DejaVu includes Greek --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 92062] Use only Unicode-Symbols

by nmailhot＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92062 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'rainerbielefeld,regina,tr|'fedorafonts,rainerbielefe |oodon' |ld,regina,troodon' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2008-07-25 03:36 EST ------- Just to clarify, these two points: > [=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in > the review. > [=] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, > as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. > > 87edeb65586b85d4ce10c1fab4f1e1aa un-fonts-core-1.0.2-080608.tar.gz are just referring to this: > Please provide the final srpm package and I am happy to approve this package. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2008-07-25 03:35 EST ------- Here is my review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [=] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. 87edeb65586b85d4ce10c1fab4f1e1aa un-fonts-core-1.0.2-080608.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Please provide the final srpm package and I am happy to approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs July 2008