fonts-bugs July 2008

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

26 participants
487 discussions

[Bug 433559] New: Inexact font match produces different results between i386, x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433559 Summary: Inexact font match produces different results between i386,x86_64 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: john.ellson(a)comcast.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: With dejavu and bitstream fonts installed, but freefont not installed, "fc-match freesans" (also "fc-match sans") produces a different results on i386 than on x86_64. At first I thought this caused doxygen/graphviz to generate different results on each platform which caused the file conflicts in multiarch installs. Bug #432683. It could have been, but in this case "sans" from dejavu and bitstream produce identical images. Its more likely that one of the build platfoms has freefont installed, which does produce different images. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.5.0-2.fc9 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum list 'dejavu*' 'bitstream*' 'freefont*' 2. fc-match freesans 3. Actual results: Installed Packages bitstream-vera-fonts.noarch 1.10-8 installed dejavu-fonts.noarch 2.23-1.fc9 installed dejavu-fonts-experimental.noarch 2.23-1.fc9 installed dejavu-lgc-fonts.noarch 2.23-1.fc9 installed Available Packages freefont.noarch 20060126-4.fc7 development Vera.ttf: "Bitstream Vera Sans" "Roman" <<-- x86_64 DejaVuSans.ttf: "DejaVu Sans" "Book" <<-- i386 Expected results: Same font on both architectures, given same fonts installed. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Bug 450709] New: fontforge can't find -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jun '09

23 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Summary: fontforge can't find -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal font Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com ReportedBy: rdtennent(a)hotmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com,roozbeh@farsiweb.info Description of problem: When I start up fontforge, I get the following error message: Help! Server claimed font -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--26-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Segmentation fault I've never see this behavior before. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 20080309-1.fc9 How reproducible: every time, on three different F9 systems Steps to Reproduce: 1.start fontforge 2. 3. Actual results: as above Expected results: fontforge opens Additional info: % xlsfonts | grep "ibm-courier" -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0 -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 % fc-list "Courier 10 Pitch" Courier 10 Pitch:style=Bold Italic Courier 10 Pitch:style=Italic Courier 10 Pitch:style=Regular Courier 10 Pitch:style=Bold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 28

[Bug 444563] New: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563 Summary: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Description of problem: When 0D2F is combined with a conjunct/consonant and followed by 0D15, instead of conjunct/consonant combining with 0D2F, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit, type 0D07, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15, 0D3E, 0D30, 0D4D, 200D Actual results: When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15 Expected results: When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24 should get combined with 0D2F. Additional info: For ref: please see the screehshot on comment #65 on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 444559] New: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Description of problem: When conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) is used in a word, the alignment is wrong, ie, the whole word do not appear to be in one line, looks as if its in a zig-zag shape. The vowels used with conjunct also is in wrong alignment How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. In gedit type any consonant, say 0D2C 2. Followed by, 0D4D, 0D30, 0D3F, 0D1F, 0D4D, 0D1F, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D Actual results: When above steps are executed, the glyph formed using 0D2C, 0D4D, 0D30,0D3F in the above word is not in alignment with the whole word Expected results: The whole word must be in a single line in same alignment and with no zig-zag shape. Additional info: For ref: see screenshot attached on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016, in comment#65 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 9

[Bug 431029] New: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'à´¨àµâà´±'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431029 Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'ന്‍റ' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: icu AssignedTo: caolanm(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list@redhat.com,fedora@leemhuis.info +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #402331 +++ Description of problem: In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 (key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct ' ന്‍റ ' . But the correct combination is 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) which must give the conjunct ന്‍റ. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്‍റ. Actual results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്‍റ. Expected results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicodes 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (or type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result must be ന്‍റ. Additional info: -- Additional comment from aalam(a)redhat.com on 2007-12-14 01:28 EST -- fonts-malayalam-2.1.5-3.fc8 -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-04 01:14 EST -- Appreciate if you could let me know the status of this bug as this has to be fixed immediately before next release. This is a very basic but very critical bug and hence must be fixed urgently. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-04 01:14 EST -- Appreciate if you could let me know the status of this bug as this has to be fixed immediately before next release. This is a very basic but very critical bug and hence must be fixed urgently. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-10 02:17 EST -- Ani,this appears to be working fine in f8. Can you please confirm the problem? -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-10 04:20 EST -- Created an attachment (id=291249) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291249&action=view) Screen shot for the conjunct combination -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 03:20 EST -- Rahul, we had a personal discussion on this bug last week. Is the issue clear for you or do you still have any doubts? Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 07:43 EST -- Ani, thanks for the concern. The problem is absolutely clear to me. It also has a relation the other bug about chillaksharam right now. -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 08:41 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292509) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292509&action=view) patch for Lohit-Malayalam.sfd This patch fixes the ligature rule in the .sfd file. -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 08:44 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292510) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292510&action=view) fixed ttf file Ani, can you please test this font file before I build it for fedora? -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:10 EST -- Rahul , I still find this is not fixed completely. Now the result is just the key sequence when 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 is used. Problem : 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 has to be used for getting the conjunct. Expected result: 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 must give the desired conjunct. Please have a look on the screenshot attached on Comment #5 Let me know if any more queries. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:22 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292624) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292624&action=view) Screenshot of the glyph of the conjunct -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:23 EST -- Rahul , I still find this is not fixed completely. Now the result is just the key sequence when 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 is used. Problem : 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 has to be used for getting the conjunct. Expected result: 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 must give the desired conjunct. Please have a look on the screenshot attached on Comment #5 Let me know if any more queries. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:25 EST -- Please ignore the comment #12 as its a repetition of comment #10. Instead please have a look in the follwing: Rahul, One more thing I would like to mention is that, now as the chillu is not working anywhere, currently 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 is also not giving the conjunct. I have already showed you the glyph of the conjunct in the font file. have attached the same as in comment #11 Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:08 EST -- Ani, from the screenshot in comment #5 attached by you, I assume you do not want the conjunct to be formed for 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31? -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:17 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292633) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292633&action=view) patch for Lohit-Malayalam.sfd This patch fixes the ligature rule in sfd file. -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:17 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292634) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292634&action=view) fixed ttf file Ani, can you please test this font file now? -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 23:39 EST -- Rahul, Yes, its working fine. Good job. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-25 07:04 EST -- Fixed in lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.1.8-1.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 9

[Bug 402331] New: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'à´¨àµâà´±'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402331 Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'ന്‍റ' Product: Fedora Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: urgent Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 (key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct ' ന്‍റ ' . But the correct combination is 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) which must give the conjunct ന്‍റ. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്‍റ. Actual results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്‍റ. Expected results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicodes 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (or type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result must be ന്‍റ. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 24

[Bug 402321] New: [ml_IN} Wrong combinations used for the conjunct 'à´¨àµà´ª'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402321 Summary: [ml_IN} Wrong combinations used for the conjunct 'ന്പ' Product: Fedora Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: urgent Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D2A (key 'V', key 'D', key 'H' on malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct ' ന്പ ' . But instead of 0D28 (key 'V'), it must be 0D2E (key 'C'). Hence the correct combination is 0D2E + 0D4D + 0D2A (type key 'C', key 'D', key 'H' on malayalam inscript keyboard)which must give the conjunct ന്പ. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 0D2A (or type key 'V', key 'D', key 'H' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്പ. Actual results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicodes 0D28, 0D4D, 0D2A (or type key 'V', key 'D', key 'H' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്പ. Expected results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicodes 0D2E, 0D4D, 0D2A (or type key 'C', key 'D', key 'H' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result must be ന്പ. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 15

[Bug 445176] New: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Mar '09

06 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176 Summary: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Description of problem: Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph, instead the conjunct, 0D4D and 0D30 just appear in key sequence. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. In gedit, type 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30 Actual results: In the above step, when 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30 is typed the conjunct 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 is followed by 0D4D and 0D30. Expected results: In the above step,when 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30 is typed the conjunct 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 must have the pre-based glyph that is formed using 0D4D and 0D30. Additional info: For ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444561 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 5

[Bug 450699] New: lohit-fonts: Errors in "sh" and "shrI" in Lohit Tamil font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450699 Summary: lohit-fonts: Errors in "sh" and "shrI" in Lohit Tamil font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: chandra(a)ee.uwa.edu.au QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: chandra(a)ee.uwa.edu.au,fedora-fonts-bugs- list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Description of problem: Errors in "sh" and "shrI" in Lohit Tamil font Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Kubuntu 8.04 (Hardy Heron) ttf-indic-fonts-core version 1:0.5.0-0ubuntu1 Problems with "sh" and "shrI" in Lohit Tamil fonts: A. The ITRANS Tamil character "sh" in Lohit Tamil is rendered as ஶ் : the dot above or pulli should be over the character rather than beside it. Most other consonants are rendered correctly. For example, the consonant "k" is correctly rendered as க். I have been told that the "font must have a correct GPOS table for pulli positioning and the rendering engine must utilise that information when drawing the glyph" for the character to show up correctly. Of the two, I think it more likely that it is the font rather than the rendering system that is likely to be faulty because க் shows up correctly. B. The character "shrI" should properly be rendered as ஸ்ரீ. This character should correctly be Unicode 0BB6 + 0BCD + 0BB0 + 0BC0 whereas in Lohit Tamil (and possibly other Tamil fonts) it is made from Unicode 0BB8 + 0BCD + 0BB0 + 0BC0, which is wrong. This should be corrected to accord with "The Unicode Standard, Revision 5.0", p 325. How reproducible: Use SCIM or some scheme that allows raw Unicode to be input into a Unicode-aware text editor and see the results onscreen. Steps to Reproduce: A 1. Ensure that locale for Tamil is set up and that Lohit Tamil is default Tamil font. 2. Install SCIM or other method to input raw Unicode from keyboard. 3. Into a Unicode-aware text editor, enter raw Unicode so: U+0BB6 + U+0BCD. 4. Verify that inputting U+0B95 + U+0BCD gives க் as expected. So problem lies with font. Actual results: For step 3: ஶ் Expected results: For step 3: ஶ with dot (pulli) above as for க் above. Steps to Reproduce: B 1. Ensure that locale for Tamil is set up and that Lohit Tamil is default Tamil font. 2. Install SCIM or other scheme to input raw Unicode from keyboard. 3. Into a Unicode-aware text editor, enter raw Unicode so: U+0BB6 + U+0BCD + U+0BB0 + U+0BC0 Actual results: For step 3: ஶ்ரீ Expected results: For step 3: ஸ்ரீ Additional info: 1. The character ஸ்ரீ is wrongly encoded as U+0BB8 + U+0BCD + U+0BB0 + U+0BC0 in Lohit Tamil. 2. These errors could exist in other Tamil fonts in addition to Lohit Tamil. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 5

[Bug 428427] New: [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 Summary: [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: svenkate(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-bugs- list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: When tested with the fonts-kannada-2.1.5-2.fc8 the 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-kannada-2.1.5-2.fc8 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1.Activate the SCIM 2.open any editor 3.Key-in 0CB5+0CCA,vo(itrans),or b`(inscript) Actual results: As shown in the attachment Expected results: As shown in the attachment Additional info: Similar kind of issue (ವೋ :: 0CB5 + 0CCB) was raised in the bug #223945(comment #3), which may help to solve this wrong liguture rule ------- Additional Comments From svenkate(a)redhat.com 2008-01-11 08:23 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291385) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291385&action=view) Actual and correct results with key sequence to reproduce -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 13

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs July 2008