To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878
------- Additional comments from dtardon(a)openoffice.org Wed Sep 3 08:01:26 +0000 2008 -------
A question to anyone acquainted with Asian/CTL fonts: Is there anything as
font-stretch in use in these fonts? If there is, then there is a need for
specific SIDs, controls and XML attributes for them as well. I haven't found any
positive evidence of it, but maybe someone knows better...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878
------- Additional comments from dtardon(a)openoffice.org Wed Sep 3 07:52:50 +0000 2008 -------
Some comments to the previous patch: It is a first try, only to get it working;
it should be fully working, though. It's for West lang. group only--if you have
enabled Asian or CTL lang. groups, you will see nothing new...
I've used list-boxes for the new controls (Posture/Weight/Stretch); they are
refilled after each change of Font Family, where each of them gets assigned all
values of the particular attribute that Family contains. That implies it's
possible to select combination which has no real counterpart in font file. There
are two another ways to solve the filling and the chosen one is somewhere
between them:
1. The controls contains always all possible values for each of them (i.e.
Normal/Italic/Oblique for Posture).
2. The controls are updated on change in any of them to reflect only allowed
combinations--this would be no change to current state.
Oh, and to apply the patch requires all my previous patches have been applied as
well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878
User dtardon changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id=
| |56164)
Independent selecti
| |on of Posture/Weight/Stret
| |ch in Format->Character di
| |alog
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from dtardon(a)openoffice.org Wed Sep 3 07:24:40 +0000 2008 -------
Created an attachment (id=56164)
Independent selection of Posture/Weight/Stretch in Format->Character dialog
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128
------- Additional comments from hdu(a)openoffice.org Wed Sep 3 06:44:34 +0000 2008 -------
This could be implemented in an OOo extension if issue 74754 would have been solved as I suggested
then.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128
------- Additional comments from meywer(a)openoffice.org Tue Sep 2 17:19:38 +0000 2008 -------
I've got a problem connected to this now:
written an odt, printed, I got instead of some glyphs just empty "boxes".
Exported a pdf - shows all characters as desired (and as OO shows).
Printed to a file - in the ps there are the boxes.
So it really should be *indicated* in OO, if there are missing glyphs on a system!!!
(And it should be *comprehensible*, which font is used instead of which one at
every place and for every single character.)
(And it should be *configurable*, how OO behaves.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450810
Summary: ugly font in default Korean
Product: Fedora
Version: 9
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: fonts-korean
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jko(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
F9 Korean font on gnome-terminal is ugly.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
------- Additional Comments From jko(a)redhat.com 2008-06-11 03:10 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=308897)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308897&action=view)
screenshot
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.