fonts-bugs January 2009

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

30 participants
1053 discussions

[Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '09

02 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-01-02 08:03:02 EDT --- php-ZendFramework-1.7.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ZendFramework-1.7.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 477055] Please drop fonts spec template from rpmdevtools
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jan '09

01 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477055 --- Comment #12 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> 2009-01-01 14:20:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Is it possible for rpmdevtools to support replacing of the macro syntax too? I suppose it's _possible_, but I'm not at all sure about the feasibility. The shell style ones can obviously be used only in specfile constructs that are shell code, and replacing macro style ones with them in other sections would cause breakage, and implementing a real specfile parser is not something I even want to think about. For spec templates that are shipped in rpmdevtools I can ensure that no breakage occurs but I can't do that for templates in other packages, such as these new font templates. > Because I know many packagers use the templates as plain text templates too > without use of rpmdevtools automation, and I'd really like the default not to > be the shell variant in that case > > I also have some opinions on this point :p Doh :P. Well, even if it's not a "solution", I suppose educating them to take advantage of the rpmdevtools features wouldn't hurt. > Of course it it's absolutely necessary for rpmdevtools I will change this. It's not "absolutely necessary", but unless changed, it will be a small regression. rpmdevtools 7.0 does not do macros->shell replacement, but it should take care of the -simple/-multi selection, always producing a foo-fonts.spec result, and <FONTNAME> replacement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 478570] Review Request: RiordonFancy-fonts - A stylized font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jan '09

01 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs January 2009