November 2009 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 532817] Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532817 Robin Sonefors <ozamosi(a)flukkost.nu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 532816] Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532816 Robin Sonefors <ozamosi(a)flukkost.nu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 532231] Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532231 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2009-11-03 16:53:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 532231] Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532231 Robin Sonefors <ozamosi(a)flukkost.nu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Robin Sonefors <ozamosi(a)flukkost.nu> 2009-11-03 16:50:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdouros-akkadian-fonts Short Description: A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform Owners: ozamosi Branches: F11 F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(john.brown009@gma | |il.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-11-03 15:12:57 EDT --- Hi Edward, 1. You seem to have based your packaging on an old (pre-fedora-11) template. Please rebase on the fonts template found in fontpackages-devel. It will considerably simplify your packaging and do more things such as generating rpm metadata for the font auto-installer 2. description: inspired on ⇒ inspired by ? accent marks ⇒ diacritics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diacritic ASCII ⇒ basic latin http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0000.pdf 3. summary: you need to find a short statement that describes the font without using its name (the font name is already included in the package name, and every package manager will display the package name next to the summary) 4. repo-font-audit notes your rpm is not including font metadata (due to the previously mentioned bad template choice) and that the font could be easily extended to cover more scripts (to relay upstream) af(1) { 0149 } az-az(8) { 011e 011f 0130 0131 015e 015f 018f 0259 } bin(6) { 0300 0301 1eb8 1eb9 1ecc 1ecd } bm(8) { 014a 014b 0186 0190 019d 0254 025b 0272 } ca(2) { 013f 0140 } co(5) { 00c6 00e6 0152 0153 0178 } crh(6) { 011e 011f 0130 0131 015e 015f } csb(8) { 0104 0105 0141 0142 0143 0144 017b 017c } da(2) { 00c6 00e6 } de(1) { 00df } et(4) { 0160 0161 017d 017e } fi(4) { 0160 0161 017d 017e } fo(3) { 00c6 00e6 00f0 } fr(5) { 00c6 00e6 0152 0153 0178 } fy(1) { 00df } gn(4) { 0129 0169 1ebd 1ef9 } ha(8) { 0181 018a 0198 0199 01b3 01b4 0253 0257 } hu(4) { 0150 0151 0170 0171 } hz(5) { 032f 1e12 1e13 1e4a 1e4b } ig(6) { 1eca 1ecb 1ecc 1ecd 1ee4 1ee5 } is(5) { 00c6 00de 00e6 00f0 00fe } ki(4) { 0128 0129 0168 0169 } kl(7) { 00c6 00e6 0128 0129 0138 0168 0169 } kr(4) { 018e 01dd 024c 024d } ku-tr(2) { 015e 015f } lb(1) { 00df } lg(2) { 014a 014b } ln(9) { 011a 011b 0186 0190 0254 025b 0301 0302 030c } mt(8) { 010a 010b 0120 0121 0126 0127 017b 017c } na(2) { 0168 0169 } nb(2) { 00c6 00e6 } nds(1) { 00df } nn(2) { 00c6 00e6 } no(2) { 00c6 00e6 } nso(2) { 0160 0161 } ny(2) { 0174 0175 } qu(1) { 02c8 } ro(6) { 0102 0103 0218 0219 021a 021b } sco(4) { 01b7 021c 021d 0292 } shs(1) { 0313 } sm(1) { 02bb }tig(221) tk(6) { 0147 0148 015e 015f 017d 017e } tn(2) { 0160 0161 } to(1) { 02bb } tr(6) { 011e 011f 0130 0131 015e 015f }vi(110) vo(0) vot(4) { 0160 0161 017d 017e } wo(2) { 014a 014b } 5. the OFL license joined to the file claims the author reserves the name as "Tiza Chalk", but the name the font declares is just "Tiza", so maybe upstream did a mistake here. It's very unusual to reserve a name different from the name the font declares. If upstream decides the font is Tiza Chalk after all you'll have to rename the package which is much easier to do before inclusion in Fedora (also need to update the fontconfig rules, but this part is easy) 6. Please ask upstream to update the licensing info in the font file next time they update it (the font file still claims its licensing is CC-By, not OFL) 7. It would probably also be a good idea to check fontlint, though its messages are clear as mud as usual -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(psatpute(a)redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #28 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-11-03 14:28:52 EDT --- Please lift the NEEDINFO when you're ready to pass to the next stage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 532231] Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532231 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |ozamosi(a)flukkost.nu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-11-03 14:27:04 EDT --- Nothing to say here, clean font and clean packaging ᚸᚸᚸ APPROVED ᚸᚸᚸ You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Nice work. repo-font-audit notes the font could be extended easily to cover more scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 105084] OpenSymbol font: Math related changes

by ih＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105084 ------- Additional comments from ih(a)openoffice.org Mon Nov 2 11:38:04 +0000 2009 ------- @all: please test the new version of the font --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 105084] OpenSymbol font: Math related changes

by ih＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105084 ------- Additional comments from ih(a)openoffice.org Mon Nov 2 11:37:35 +0000 2009 ------- Created an attachment (id=65852) new Version (2.0) of OpenSymbol Font --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs November 2009