[Bug 512504] New: syntaxError: invalid syntax File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py", line 397 as = p.getAssembly()
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: syntaxError: invalid syntax File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py", line 397 as = p.getAssembly()
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512504
Summary: syntaxError: invalid syntax File
"/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTool
s/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py", line 397 as =
p.getAssembly()
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fonttools
AssignedTo: roozbeh(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 473302
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
While building latest heuristica snapshot
rm Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttx
rm: cannot remove `Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttx': No such file or directory
ttx Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttf
make: [Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttx] Error 1 (ignored)
Dumping "Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttf" to "Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttx"...
Dumping 'GlyphOrder' table...
Dumping 'head' table...
Dumping 'hhea' table...
Dumping 'maxp' table...
Dumping 'OS/2' table...
Dumping 'hmtx' table...
Dumping 'cmap' table...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/ttx", line 11, in <module>
ttx.main(sys.argv[1:])
File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttx.py", line
288, in main
process(jobs, options)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttx.py", line
273, in process
action(input, output, options)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttx.py", line
170, in ttDump
disassembleInstructions=options.disassembleInstructions)
File
"/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/__init__.py",
line 267, in saveXML
self._tableToXML(tableWriter, tag, progress)
File
"/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/__init__.py",
line 282, in _tableToXML
table = self[tag]
File
"/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/__init__.py",
line 366, in __getitem__
tableClass = getTableClass(tag)
File
"/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/__init__.py",
line 774, in getTableClass
module = getTableModule(tag)
File
"/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/__init__.py",
line 763, in getTableModule
__import__("fontTools.ttLib.tables." + pyTag)
File
"/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/tables/_f_p_g_m.py",
line 3, in <module>
import ttProgram
File
"/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py",
line 397
as = p.getAssembly()
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
make: *** [Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttx] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fonttools x86_64 2.2-5.fc11
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 8 months
[Bug 510174] New: Version Info is not updated.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Version Info is not updated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510174
Summary: Version Info is not updated.
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 503430
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
Version is not 1.02.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090706
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install the font.
2. Open the fonts in /usr/share/fonts/liberation/* with fontforge.
3. Check with font info.
Actual results:
1.02
Expected results:
1.05.1.20090706 or 1.05.1 or 1.05.
Additional info:
N/A
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 8 months
[Bug 466029] New: fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking accesses
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking accesses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466029
Summary: fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking
accesses
Product: Fedora
Version: 9
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: fonts-KOI8-R
AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: goeran(a)uddeborg.se
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The file /usr/share/fonts/KOI8-R/misc/fonts.dir contains two entries for each
font, one for the pcf.gz file and one for a bdf file that isn't included in the
package. Apparently, the presence of the bdf entry breaks accesses to these
fonts. As an example, it contains:
9x15s.bdf -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-140-75-75-c-90-koi8-ub
9x15s.pcf.gz -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-140-75-75-c-90-koi8-ub
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-10.fc8.noarch
How reproducible:
Every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install fonts-KOI8-R
2. xfd -fn 9x15
Actual results:
Warning: Cannot convert string "9x15" to type FontStruct
xfd: no font to display
Expected results:
A window with the font displayed.
Additional info:
The bug can be avoided by rerunning mkfontdir in /usr/share/fonts/KOI8-R/misc.
(And trigger the X server to reread its font files.) But there is no RPM
script or other automatic way this is done. It must be done "by hand" after
installation by the system administrator. And after doing this, the package
fails a verify check by RPM.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 22579] New: OO.o devs think DejaVu kerning is broken for windows apps
by bugzilla-daemon＠freedesktop.org
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22579
Summary: OO.o devs think DejaVu kerning is broken for windows
apps
Product: DejaVu
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: General
AssignedTo: dejavu-bugs(a)lists.freedesktop.org
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
See http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102911
« Every windows application that relies on the GDI call GetKerningPairs() will
fail with these problematic
fonts. On the other hand the font's kern table is valid and OOo is right that
it trusts GDI to provide the
kerning pairs. There are four ways to fix it:
1. fix Windows so that GetKerningPairs() ignores pairs it cannot handle
2. remove the problematic kernings from the DejaVu Serif fonts
3. make sure that every glyph mentioned in the kern table has a (proper or
dummy) unicode inside the
baseplane
4. make OOo and all other Windows applications avoid GDI calls and parse all
font tables themselves »
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 497090] New: [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497090
Summary: [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts
are being rendered
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fonts-indic
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: runab(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rbhalera(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
In case of conjuncts with Yaphala (U09CD+U09AF), multiple Yaphala signs can be
typed consecutively giving rise to invalid conjunct combinations.
e.g ক্য্য্য্য (ক+্+য+্+য+্+য+্+য)
This error could be replicated in gedit, kwrite and Openoffice.org Writer
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fonts-indic: 2.3.8-1.fc11
gedit : 2.26.1-1.fc11
openoffice.org: 3.1.0-9.2.fc11
kdebase : 4.2.2-2.fc11
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open gedit
2. Type in the following unicode values (for the above example) :
U0995+U09CD+U09AF+U09CD+U09AF+U09CD+U09AF+U09CD+U09AF
Actual results:
The last 3 U09CD+U09AF pairs are allowed as part of the conjunct
Expected results:
The U09CD+U09AF pair should not be allowed to be rendered after another
U09CD+U09AF. i.e. only one U09CD+U09AF pair can be used when combining with
another consonant to form a conjunct.
Additional info:
Please do note that: U09AF+U09CD+U09AF is a valid conjunct combination, where
two U09AF characters combine to form a conjunct (য্য)
Screenshots:
gedit: http://runab.fedorapeople.org/assorted-bugs/gedit-ya.png
kwrite: http://runab.fedorapeople.org/assorted-bugs/kwrite-ya.png
oowrite: http://runab.fedorapeople.org/assorted-bugs/oowrite-ya.png
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 497768] New: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497768
Summary: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than
language
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
Machine with Rawhide, having Maithili(mai_IN) language only, while checking
font for language, it is showing "Lohit Hindi", while maithili fonts are
installed on machine.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11.i586
lohit-maithili-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. in gnome-terminal run,
2. $fc-match
3.
Actual results:
[aalam@333-333 ~]$ echo $LANG
mai_IN
[aalam@333-333 ~]$ fc-match
lohit_hi.ttf: "Lohit Hindi" "Regular"
Expected results:
"Lohit Maithili"
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 517783] New: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517783
Summary: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than
language
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, besfahbo(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 497768
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Clone Of: 497768
Bug Clone for Rawhide with following version:
---------
fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc12
lohit-maithili-fonts-2.4.0-2.fc12
--------
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #497768 +++
Description of problem:
Machine with Rawhide, having Maithili(mai_IN) language only, while checking
font for language, it is showing "Lohit Hindi", while maithili fonts are
installed on machine.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11.i586
lohit-maithili-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. in gnome-terminal run,
2. $fc-match
3.
Actual results:
[aalam@333-333 ~]$ echo $LANG
mai_IN
[aalam@333-333 ~]$ fc-match
lohit_hi.ttf: "Lohit Hindi" "Regular"
Expected results:
"Lohit Maithili"
Additional info:
--- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2009-06-09
10:37:57 EDT ---
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11
development cycle.
Changing version to '11'.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--- Additional comment from psatpute(a)redhat.com on 2009-08-16 23:42:57 EDT ---
*** Bug 517635 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 477331] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: asana-math-fonts
AssignedTo: jonstanley(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jonstanley(a)gmail.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 477044
Classification: Fedora
After more than a month of consultation,
feedback and tweaking new font packaging guidelines have been approved
by FESCO.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Package maintainers must now convert their packages in rawhide to the new
templates.
The following packages have already been converted in rawhide and can
serve as examples if the templates published in the fontpackages-devel package
are not clear enough:
❄ andika-fonts
❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts
❄ bitstream-vera-fonts
❄ charis-fonts
❄ dejavu-fonts
❄ ecolier-court-fonts
❄ edrip-fonts
❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts
❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts
❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts
❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts
❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts
❄ gfs-complutum-fonts
❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts
❄ gfs-didot-fonts
❄ gfs-eustace-fonts
❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts
❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts
❄ gfs-gazis-fonts
❄ gfs-jackson-fonts
❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts
❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts
❄ gfs-olga-fonts
❄ gfs-porson-fonts
❄ gfs-solomos-fonts
❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts
❄ stix-fonts
❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
FPC and FESCO were not consulted on splitting or renaming packages,
nevertheless the new templates make it fare easier to manage subpackages, so
you're strongly encouraged to split your packages along font family lines.
A mandatory rule about splitting will probably be submitted for approval before
the F11 release.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 477333] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477333
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: brettfont-fonts
AssignedTo: jonstanley(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jonstanley(a)gmail.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 477044
Classification: Fedora
After more than a month of consultation,
feedback and tweaking new font packaging guidelines have been approved
by FESCO.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Package maintainers must now convert their packages in rawhide to the new
templates.
The following packages have already been converted in rawhide and can
serve as examples if the templates published in the fontpackages-devel package
are not clear enough:
❄ andika-fonts
❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts
❄ bitstream-vera-fonts
❄ charis-fonts
❄ dejavu-fonts
❄ ecolier-court-fonts
❄ edrip-fonts
❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts
❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts
❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts
❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts
❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts
❄ gfs-complutum-fonts
❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts
❄ gfs-didot-fonts
❄ gfs-eustace-fonts
❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts
❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts
❄ gfs-gazis-fonts
❄ gfs-jackson-fonts
❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts
❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts
❄ gfs-olga-fonts
❄ gfs-porson-fonts
❄ gfs-solomos-fonts
❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts
❄ stix-fonts
❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
FPC and FESCO were not consulted on splitting or renaming packages,
nevertheless the new templates make it fare easier to manage subpackages, so
you're strongly encouraged to split your packages along font family lines.
A mandatory rule about splitting will probably be submitted for approval before
the F11 release.
Further information on fonts packaging changes will be published on
fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 477398] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477398
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: icelandic-fonts
AssignedTo: jonstanley(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jonstanley(a)gmail.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
