fonts-bugs February 2009

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

34 participants
789 discussions

[Bug 479371] New: Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jun '09

30 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Summary: Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cody(a)zone38.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=328517) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328517) Liberation Mono 1.04.93 with antialiasing on Description of problem: Though the hinting has been fixed in Sans Bold as of version 1.04.92, the letter "u" still has incorrect hinting in Mono Bold, an error that's quite noticeable in certain sizes on any system with bytecode hinting enabled. I'm attaching a screenshot from Ubuntu to demonstrate; of particular note are 9 point (the second line) and 12 point (the 5th line). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.04.93 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 479521] New: Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jun '09

30 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479521 Summary: Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pander(a)users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ttf-liberation 1.04~beta2-2 from Ubuntu 8.10 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. retrieve font nama table ttx -d . -t name /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-liberation/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf 2. in python, read the XML file via doc = libxml2.parseFile('LiberationSans-Regular.ttx') Actual results: LiberationSans-Regular.ttx:27: parser error : xmlParseCharRef: invalid xmlChar value 1 Liberation is a trademark of Red Ht, Inc. registered in U.S. Patent an ^ LiberationSans-Regular.ttx:69: parser error : xmlParseCharRef: invalid xmlChar value 1 Liberation is a trademark of Red Ht, Inc. registered in U.S. Patent an Expected results: Red Ht should be Red Hat, this is all right for the other TTF files in this package. Additional info: Please fix and push updated package downstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 466672] New: Missing fontconfig scriplets
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jun '09

25 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Missing fontconfig scriplets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466672 Summary: Missing fontconfig scriplets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: un-core-fonts AssignedTo: smallvil(a)get9.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, smallvil(a)get9.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora The un-core-fonts-*-1.0.2-0.5.080608.fc10.noarch.rpm packages are missing the required scriplets to update fontconfig cache, resulting in broken out-of-the-box installation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 450709] New: fontforge can't find -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jun '09

23 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Summary: fontforge can't find -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal font Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com ReportedBy: rdtennent(a)hotmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com,roozbeh@farsiweb.info Description of problem: When I start up fontforge, I get the following error message: Help! Server claimed font -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--26-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Segmentation fault I've never see this behavior before. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 20080309-1.fc9 How reproducible: every time, on three different F9 systems Steps to Reproduce: 1.start fontforge 2. 3. Actual results: as above Expected results: fontforge opens Additional info: % xlsfonts | grep "ibm-courier" -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0 -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-adobe-standard -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-ascii-0 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 % fc-list "Courier 10 Pitch" Courier 10 Pitch:style=Bold Italic Courier 10 Pitch:style=Italic Courier 10 Pitch:style=Regular Courier 10 Pitch:style=Bold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 28

[Bug 462041] New: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jun '09

06 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Depends on: 462038 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #462038 +++ Description of problem: #1: Hotkeys are not responded. #2: "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start fontforge from gnome-terminal. 2. Try hotkeys like Alt-F. 3. Observe symptom #1. 4. Select View > Goto from menu. 5. Try to input something in the input field. 6. Observe symptom #2. Actual results: #1. No response. #2. Couldn't be inputted. Expected results: #1. File sub-menu pops up. #2. Data is inputted in field. Additional info: HEAD of F9 has same issue as well. --- Additional comment from cchance(a)redhat.com on 2008-09-12 02:26:49 EDT --- `LANG=C fontforge [FILE]` resolves as workaround. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 462038] New: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jun '09

06 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: #1: Hotkeys are not responded. #2: "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start fontforge from gnome-terminal. 2. Try hotkeys like Alt-F. 3. Observe symptom #1. 4. Select View > Goto from menu. 5. Try to input something in the input field. 6. Observe symptom #2. Actual results: #1. No response. #2. Couldn't be inputted. Expected results: #1. File sub-menu pops up. #2. Data is inputted in field. Additional info: HEAD of F9 has same issue as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 458951] New: [snd-IN] Sindhi language is not identified by fontconfig
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jun '09

02 Jun '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [snd-IN] Sindhi language is not identified by fontconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458951 Summary: [snd-IN] Sindhi language is not identified by fontconfig Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: rbhalera(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: One of the scripts used for representing Sindhi language is Devanagari. Although the fonts for Devanagari are installed, fontconfig does not recognize them as Sindhi fonts. This is because there is no snd.orth file for Sindhi language. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 444563] New: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563 Summary: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Description of problem: When 0D2F is combined with a conjunct/consonant and followed by 0D15, instead of conjunct/consonant combining with 0D2F, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit, type 0D07, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15, 0D3E, 0D30, 0D4D, 200D Actual results: When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15 Expected results: When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24 should get combined with 0D2F. Additional info: For ref: please see the screehshot on comment #65 on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 444559] New: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Description of problem: When conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) is used in a word, the alignment is wrong, ie, the whole word do not appear to be in one line, looks as if its in a zig-zag shape. The vowels used with conjunct also is in wrong alignment How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. In gedit type any consonant, say 0D2C 2. Followed by, 0D4D, 0D30, 0D3F, 0D1F, 0D4D, 0D1F, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D Actual results: When above steps are executed, the glyph formed using 0D2C, 0D4D, 0D30,0D3F in the above word is not in alignment with the whole word Expected results: The whole word must be in a single line in same alignment and with no zig-zag shape. Additional info: For ref: see screenshot attached on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016, in comment#65 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 9

[Bug 431029] New: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'à´¨àµâà´±'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '09

27 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431029 Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'ന്‍റ' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: icu AssignedTo: caolanm(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list@redhat.com,fedora@leemhuis.info +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #402331 +++ Description of problem: In lohit-malayalam font, 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 (key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) gives the conjunct ' ന്‍റ ' . But the correct combination is 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift J' on malayalam inscript keyboard) which must give the conjunct ന്‍റ. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്‍റ. Actual results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicode 0D28, 0D4D, 200D , 0D31(or type key 'V', key 'D', key ']' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result is ന്‍റ. Expected results: 1.Open gedit/kedit. 2.Type unicodes 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 (or type key 'V', key 'D' and key ' shift J' respectively using Malayalam Inscript). 3.Result must be ന്‍റ. Additional info: -- Additional comment from aalam(a)redhat.com on 2007-12-14 01:28 EST -- fonts-malayalam-2.1.5-3.fc8 -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-04 01:14 EST -- Appreciate if you could let me know the status of this bug as this has to be fixed immediately before next release. This is a very basic but very critical bug and hence must be fixed urgently. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-04 01:14 EST -- Appreciate if you could let me know the status of this bug as this has to be fixed immediately before next release. This is a very basic but very critical bug and hence must be fixed urgently. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-10 02:17 EST -- Ani,this appears to be working fine in f8. Can you please confirm the problem? -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-10 04:20 EST -- Created an attachment (id=291249) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291249&action=view) Screen shot for the conjunct combination -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 03:20 EST -- Rahul, we had a personal discussion on this bug last week. Is the issue clear for you or do you still have any doubts? Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 07:43 EST -- Ani, thanks for the concern. The problem is absolutely clear to me. It also has a relation the other bug about chillaksharam right now. -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 08:41 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292509) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292509&action=view) patch for Lohit-Malayalam.sfd This patch fixes the ligature rule in the .sfd file. -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-22 08:44 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292510) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292510&action=view) fixed ttf file Ani, can you please test this font file before I build it for fedora? -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:10 EST -- Rahul , I still find this is not fixed completely. Now the result is just the key sequence when 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 is used. Problem : 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 has to be used for getting the conjunct. Expected result: 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 must give the desired conjunct. Please have a look on the screenshot attached on Comment #5 Let me know if any more queries. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:22 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292624) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292624&action=view) Screenshot of the glyph of the conjunct -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:23 EST -- Rahul , I still find this is not fixed completely. Now the result is just the key sequence when 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 is used. Problem : 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 has to be used for getting the conjunct. Expected result: 0D28 + 0D4D + 0D31 must give the desired conjunct. Please have a look on the screenshot attached on Comment #5 Let me know if any more queries. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 06:25 EST -- Please ignore the comment #12 as its a repetition of comment #10. Instead please have a look in the follwing: Rahul, One more thing I would like to mention is that, now as the chillu is not working anywhere, currently 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31 is also not giving the conjunct. I have already showed you the glyph of the conjunct in the font file. have attached the same as in comment #11 Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:08 EST -- Ani, from the screenshot in comment #5 attached by you, I assume you do not want the conjunct to be formed for 0D28 + 0D4D + 200D + 0D31? -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:17 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292633) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292633&action=view) patch for Lohit-Malayalam.sfd This patch fixes the ligature rule in sfd file. -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 08:17 EST -- Created an attachment (id=292634) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=292634&action=view) fixed ttf file Ani, can you please test this font file now? -- Additional comment from apeter(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-23 23:39 EST -- Rahul, Yes, its working fine. Good job. Thanks Ani -- Additional comment from rbhalera(a)redhat.com on 2008-01-25 07:04 EST -- Fixed in lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.1.8-1.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 9

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
79
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs February 2009