fonts-bugs February 2009

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

34 participants
789 discussions

[Bug 477449] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477449 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: roadstencil-fonts AssignedTo: jonstanley(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jonstanley(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 477459] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477459 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: sportrop-fonts AssignedTo: jonstanley(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jonstanley(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 478332] New: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478332 Summary: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: urw-fonts AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: besfahbo(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Apparently glyph 227 (or maybe 226 according to fontforge) of /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022024l.pfb has a width of 740 while all the other glyphs in the font have width 600. This causes fontconfig to mark the font as proportional instead of monospace. That then is causing other issues: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17493 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 474514] New: file conflict on upgrading
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jun '10

26 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file conflict on upgrading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474514 Summary: file conflict on upgrading Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: dejavu-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-BoldOblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Oblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-BoldItalic.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Italic.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-BoldItalic.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): # rpm -qa | grep dejavu dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 477486] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 May '10

29 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Bug 477429] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '10

13 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477429 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: myanmar3-unicode-fonts AssignedTo: mvaliyav(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mvaliyav(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 440992] New: Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '10

10 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 Summary: Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.secarica.ro OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs- list@redhat.com,marius.stracna@mobexpert.ro Description of problem: When used on a system configured for Romanian language, liberation-fonts generates wrong characters: - "T with cedilla below" (Unicode 0162) instead of "T with comma below" (Unicode 021A) - "t with cedilla below" (Unicode 0163) instead of "t with comma below" (Unicode 021B) - "S with cedilla below" (Unicode 015E) instead of "S with comma below" (Unicode 0218) - "s with cedilla below" (Unicode 015F) instead of "s with comma below" (Unicode 0219) For non-Romanian developers: there is no such thing as „cedilla-below” characters in Romanian language; please see http://www.secarica.ro Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts.noarch 0:1.0-4.fc9 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install latest Fedora (development) 2. Configure it for Romanian language 3. Open a new text document in OpenOffice.org 4. Press AltGr+s and AltGr+t (and Shift for capitals) to insert the specific Romanian characters. Actual results: Characters with cedilla below are inserted in the document. Expected results: Characters with comma below should be inserted. Additional info: This is a historical bug for Romanian language implementations, still not solved . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 49

[Bug 450061] New: [ro] Create (U+0218..021B, 2011) in Liberation Fonts.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '10

10 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450061 Summary: [ro] Create (U+0218..021B,2011) in Liberation Fonts. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.secarica.ro OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: kbd AssignedTo: vcrhonek(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: alexxed@gmail.com,eng-i18n-bugs@redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list@redhat.com,marius.stracna@mobexpert.ro +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #440992 +++ Description of problem: Glyph request on the codepoint: - "T with comma below" (Unicode 021A) - "t with comma below" (Unicode 021B) - "S with comma below" (Unicode 0218) - "s with comma below" (Unicode 0219) - HYPHEN, U+2010 - NON-BREAKING HYPHEN, U+2011 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kbd-1.12-31.fc9.i386 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install latest Fedora (development) 2. Configure it for Romanian language 3. Go to console by Alt-F1 (not GUI terminals) 4. Press AltGr+s and AltGr+t (and Shift for capitals) to insert the specific Romanian characters. Actual results: Expected results: Characters mentioned should be inserted. Additional info: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 -- Additional comment from razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro on 2008-06-04 02:52 EST -- Hello, Caius & all, When system is set to Romanian (by anaconda, at install time or via system-config-language, afterwards), in /etc/sysconfig/i18n we get a line: SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16" Caius, please, do you know from which .rpm package these default fonts come from ? We must file & resolve a bug regarding the comma/cedilla issue for these default fonts and I don't know where to adress it, exactly. This is extremely important, since the "latarcyrheb-sun16" is the first thing that system "sees" after boot and we've already got some crashes due to incorrect encoding. In some situations, some programs (including anaconda) worked OK when set to English, but tracebacks occured when set to Romanian. Thanks a lot, Răzvan -- Additional comment from cchance(a)redhat.com on 2008-06-04 03:41 EST -- Hi Răzvan, (In reply to comment #20) Hmm, it looks quite serious, doesn't it? It's belonged to 'kbd' package in recent Fedora. Please feel free to file another bug on that package for requesting supports on the issues you kindly discovered. Cheers, Caius. -- Additional comment from alexxed(a)gmail.com on 2008-06-04 05:36 EST -- (In reply to comment #20) > Hello, Caius & all, > > When system is set to Romanian (by anaconda, at install time or via > system-config-language, afterwards), in /etc/sysconfig/i18n we get a line: > > SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16" > Are you sure? I've installed Fedora 9 i386 and x86_64 several times and /etc/sysconfig/i18n looks like this: LANG="ro_RO.UTF-8" SYSFONT="Lat2-Terminus16" I did use the graphical installer all the time. It may be only in text mode, I'll test this. Meantime here's a list of related bugs where this was addressed: - comments 23 and 24 in bug 253892 - bug list: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?version=&component=anaconda&bug_sta… before opening a new bug. -- Additional comment from razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro on 2008-06-04 07:48 EST -- Sorry, my fault ! All systems I have at hand, running F9, were *upgraded* from F8, not fresh installs. So Terminus is now, in F9, the default font when setting system to Romanian ? However: - changing the default font is just a temporary solution, IMHO. "latarcyrheb-sun16" should also include the correct glyphs for the Romanian language; - when upgrading a (*Romanian*) system from F8 to F9, why don't we change that line in /etc/sysconfig/i18n during the upgrade itself ? Is that the correct behaviour ? - as for the keyboard configurator (system-config-keyboard, in both X and text mode), it seems it dissapeared from the System menu, in F9. And I see no replacement for it... Regards, Răzvan -- Additional comment from razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro on 2008-06-04 07:51 EST -- Regarding comment #23, probably the correct behaviour at point no. 2 is to leave that line alone, but have the correct glyphs in "latarcyrheb-sun16" ;-) Regards, Răzvan -- Additional comment from alexxed(a)gmail.com on 2008-06-04 08:00 EST -- (In reply to comment #23) > Sorry, my fault ! > > All systems I have at hand, running F9, were *upgraded* from F8, not fresh > installs. So Terminus is now, in F9, the default font when setting system to > Romanian ? Yes, it was the quick solution. > > > However: > > - changing the default font is just a temporary solution, IMHO. > "latarcyrheb-sun16" should also include the correct glyphs for the Romanian > language; I head that Fedora is planning to convert the X fonts to terminal fonts and drop all the terminal fonts, so maybe it's worth investigating this first. > > - when upgrading a (*Romanian*) system from F8 to F9, why don't we change that > line in /etc/sysconfig/i18n during the upgrade itself ? Is that the correct > behaviour ? I'm afraid so, rpm upgrade keeps existing configuration. > > - as for the keyboard configurator (system-config-keyboard, in both X and text > mode), it seems it dissapeared from the System menu, in F9. And I see no > replacement for it... Search bugzilla or ask in the mailing list what plans are there for system-config-keyboard and system-config-language in the future. Here is a link: http://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/ that you can use to find out where to report a bug to a component. Click on the module you want and see a link to report a bug -- Additional comment from nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net on 2008-06-04 08:11 EST -- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #23) > > However: > > > > - changing the default font is just a temporary solution, IMHO. > > "latarcyrheb-sun16" should also include the correct glyphs for the Romanian > > language; > > I head that Fedora is planning to convert the X fonts to terminal fonts and drop > all the terminal fonts, so maybe it's worth investigating this first. As far as I know what's planned is conversion of X keyboard layouts to console layouts. I doubt converting complex vector TTF/OTF fonts to dumb bitmap console fonts is possible without major human involvment. -- Additional comment from cchance(a)redhat.com on 2008-06-04 20:38 EST -- FYI, The font Alexandru mentioned is also within same console font package: $ rpm -qf /lib/kbd/consolefonts/Lat2-Terminus16.psf.gz kbd-1.12-31.fc9.i386 I agree Nicolas about converting complex vector TTF/OTF fonts to dumb bitmap console fonts. Even if the TTF/OTF embedded bitmap glyphs, font style consistency/readability might also be an issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 16

[Bug 463036] New: Bold u renders badly (blurry) for liberation sans, w too to a smaller extent
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '10

05 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Bold u renders badly (blurry) for liberation sans, w too to a smaller extent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463036 Summary: Bold u renders badly (blurry) for liberation sans, w too to a smaller extent Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: saurabh(a)hotmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: n/t, see attached image. I have not tested this on architectures other than windows xp. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Latest 1.0.4 and 1.0.4.91-devel How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 24

[Bug 485746] New: (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '10

05 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485746 Summary: (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is a tracker bug for tracking all hinting issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
79
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs February 2009