May 2009 - fonts-bugs - Fedora mailing-lists

rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 sil-charis-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.2, 1.3
by nim 21 May '09

21 May '09

Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22328/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore import.log sil-charis-fonts.spec sources Log Message: 4.106 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 21 May 2009 18:11:58 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -CharisSIL4.104.zip +CharisSIL4.106.zip Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 23 Feb 2009 09:01:05 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 21 May 2009 18:11:59 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ sil-charis-fonts-4_104-6_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-6.fc11.src.rpm:1233040224 sil-charis-fonts-4_104-7_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-7.fc11.src.rpm:1235379642 +sil-charis-fonts-4_106-1_fc12:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.106-1.fc12.src.rpm:1242929489 Index: sil-charis-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sil-charis-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- sil-charis-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 00:59:58 -0000 1.4 +++ sil-charis-fonts.spec 21 May 2009 18:11:59 -0000 1.5 @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ %global archivename CharisSIL Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 4.104 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Version: 4.106 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter Group: User Interface/X @@ -66,10 +66,14 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf -%doc *.txt *.pdf +%doc *.txt %changelog +* Fri May 21 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> +- 4.106-1 +– This version supports Unicode 5.1 and adds support for Small capitals + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 4.104-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 21 May 2009 18:11:59 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -acc153c243b90e3e5d0bb53476ab894e CharisSIL4.104.zip +045aea5116c6c20e5b84e165d9727f0c CharisSIL4.106.zip

1 0

[Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 May '09

21 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-21 13:52:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > First review: > > 1. W: file-not-utf8 > /usr/share/doc/NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts-20080906/FONTLOG.txt > ⇒ please use iconv to fix this file's encoding (you have an example in sil > andika, make sure you've the right source encoding though) > > 2. please use lowercase package naming only as requested by the fonts packaging > guidelines > > 3. please add the oflb- foundry prefix to the package name > > 4. unless the fonts authors asked you to, I don't thing the -sfd postfix is > really needed > > 5. your URL does not work > > 6. it seems upstreams versions this font properly, so you can use a real > version instead of a timestamp (current is 1.1) > > 7. I'd drop the first § of your description > > 8. the font is derived from a GPL font so it must stay GPL. Upstream has > already fixed this in its last release (do not forget to update your %doc) > > 9. Be very careful to use the exact name the font declares in your fontconfig > file. For version 1.1, it will be "NotCourierSans" > > 10. since the fonts are missing an italic face, I wouldn't stack them at 60 in > fontconfig, 61 or 62 would be better > > Anyway that's all for now, thank you for continuing to package Fedora fonts bah... they edited it all on may 17.. I'll redo the package.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 May '09

21 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-05-21 13:24:26 EDT --- If your package does not include any font anymore I have certainly nothing to say about it. Though if some of them were not available in Fedora, it'd be nice to get them packaged separately. It's all documented pretty extensively in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Technical_implementation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 May '09

21 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-05-21 13:18:59 EDT --- First review: 1. W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts-20080906/FONTLOG.txt ⇒ please use iconv to fix this file's encoding (you have an example in sil andika, make sure you've the right source encoding though) 2. please use lowercase package naming only as requested by the fonts packaging guidelines 3. please add the oflb- foundry prefix to the package name 4. unless the fonts authors asked you to, I don't thing the -sfd postfix is really needed 5. your URL does not work 6. it seems upstreams versions this font properly, so you can use a real version instead of a timestamp (current is 1.1) 7. I'd drop the first § of your description 8. the font is derived from a GPL font so it must stay GPL. Upstream has already fixed this in its last release (do not forget to update your %doc) 9. Be very careful to use the exact name the font declares in your fontconfig file. For version 1.1, it will be "NotCourierSans" 10. since the fonts are missing an italic face, I wouldn't stack them at 60 in fontconfig, 61 or 62 would be better Anyway that's all for now, thank you for continuing to package Fedora fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 May '09

21 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(tcallawa(a)redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-05-21 12:39:07 EDT --- Seems I'm a slacker at heart. Sorry for the delay. Anyway: 1. the source is in macosx zip format. Since the people in charge of rpm and unzip refused to fix their support for osx zip archives, you need to perform the un-zipping manually to avoid leaving a stray __MACOSX directory behind in the build root (annoys people doing full-distro rebuilds). Use something like: %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} (the gfs font packages have the same problem) 2. Microsoft considers faces in modern font families should only differ on weight, width or slope) and a lot of software is confused by anything else. Therefore, the shadow face should be split in a woodardworks-laconic-shadow-fonts subpackage IMHO, making it a multi-family package. 3. the font is definitely sans-serif, your fontconfig file should declare it there The rest of the packaging seems fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 478634] wesnoth upstream should use fontconfig
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 May '09

21 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478634 Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Have upstream use |wesnoth upstream should use |fontconfig |fontconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 478634] Have upstream use fontconfig
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 May '09

21 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478634 Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tosta(a)users.sourceforge.net --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2009-05-21 08:11:00 EDT --- *** Bug 501835 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 May '09

21 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 485562] New: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 May '09

20 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Summary: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: kee(a)ketan.jp QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=331920) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331920) Rendering comparison Description of problem: After installing vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch, some Japanese characters are incorrectly rendered with a different font (apparently a Chinese one). More specifically, when an ASCII alphabetical character is followed some Japanese characters (Japanese punctuations for example), the followed characters are not rendered with the VLGothic font, but with a Chinese one. This does not happen with VLGothic-fonts-20081029-1.fc10.noarch and before. See attached image for comparison. gedit is used for capturing. The "monospace" font and the "sans-serif" font causes this problem. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Display a Japanese text with "monospace" or "sans-serif" font. Actual results: Some characters are rendered with a Chinese font. Expected results: Characters should be rendered with the VLGothic font. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 May '09

19 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Chris Lumens <clumens(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh(a)redhat.com) --- Comment #14 from Chris Lumens <clumens(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-19 11:14:48 EDT --- I changed out a lot of font package names for F11. Is this any better now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 501420] New: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '09

18 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501420 Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=344550) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344550) 0BB8-0BC1.jpg Description of problem: When inputing "U+0BB8 U+0BC" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC" in gedit, the results were wrong. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input "U+0BB8 U+0BC" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC" in gedit. Actual results: The result are U+0BB8 U+0BC ஸு U+0BB9 U+0BC ஹு and they are different from the correct images. Expected results: Please see the attachment: 0BB8-0BC1.jpg and 0BB9-0BC1.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 501418] New: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '09

18 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501418 Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.36,1.37
by Jens Petersen 18 May '09

18 May '09

Author: petersen Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10466 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: remove redundant obsoletes, provides and conflicts from new subpackages Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.36 retrieving revision 1.37 diff -u -p -r1.36 -r1.37 --- liberation-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 14:32:20 -0000 1.36 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 19 May 2009 03:11:27 -0000 1.37 @@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ New. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts Version: 1.04.93 -Release: 10%{?dist} -# The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two +Release: 11%{?dist} +# The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two # exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. -# The second exception is an anti-lockdown clause somewhat like the one in +# The second exception is an anti-lockdown clause somewhat like the one in # GPLv3. This license is Free, but GPLv2 and GPLv3 incompatible. License: Liberation Group: User Interface/X @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= %description %common_desc -Meta-package of Liberation fonts which installs Sans, Serif, and Monospace +Meta-package of Liberation fonts which installs Sans, Serif, and Monospace families. %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{fontname}-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{fontname}-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release} -Obsoletes: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat %common_desc @@ -69,9 +69,6 @@ Meta-package for installing all three fo Summary: Sans-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} -Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Obsoletes: liberation-sans-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Provides: liberation-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts %common_desc @@ -84,9 +81,6 @@ This is Sans-serif TrueType fonts that r Summary: Serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Times New Roman Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} -Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Obsoletes: liberation-serif-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Provides: liberation-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts %common_desc @@ -100,9 +94,6 @@ Roman. Summary: Monospace fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Courier New Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} -Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Obsoletes: liberation-mono-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Provides: liberation-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts %common_desc @@ -134,6 +125,9 @@ mkfontscale %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Tue May 19 2009 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> - 1.04.93-11 +- remove redundant obsoletes, provides and conflicts from new subpackages + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.04.93-10 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild @@ -169,7 +163,7 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} * Thu Jul 17 2008 Caius Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 1.04.90-1.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#258592 - (Incorrect glyph points and missing hinting instructions for U+0079, U+03BC, + (Incorrect glyph points and missing hinting instructions for U+0079, U+03BC, U+0431, U+2010..2012.) * Thu Jul 17 2008 Caius Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 1.04-1.fc10 @@ -217,7 +211,7 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} - Change the license tag to "GPL + font exception" * Mon May 14 2007 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> 0.1-7 -- Correct the source url +- Correct the source url * Mon May 14 2007 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> 0.1-6 - Incorporate package review feedback

1 0

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 18 May '09

18 May '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #188 from philippe <phiw(a)l-c-n.com> 2009-05-18 17:21:20 PDT --- (In reply to comment #187) > The sample for @font-face on MDC used to work but stopped working at some point > fairly recently. Can someone take a look at it and let me know what's wrong > with it? > > http://tinyurl.com/brohuv The test case uses Vera Serif bold, which seems to have bad checksums. See bug 483459. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 18 May '09

18 May '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #187 from Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd <eshepherd(a)mozilla.com> 2009-05-18 09:01:14 PDT --- The sample for @font-face on MDC used to work but stopped working at some point fairly recently. Can someone take a look at it and let me know what's wrong with it? http://tinyurl.com/brohuv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 472695] exa-master-upgrade breaks glyph rendering with OLPC XO
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '09

18 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472695 --- Comment #4 from Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-18 08:00:02 EDT --- Reporter, could you please reply to the previous question? If you won't reply in one month, I will have to close this bug as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
by hdu＠openoffice.org 18 May '09

18 May '09

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from hdu(a)openoffice.org Mon May 18 11:10:11 +0000 2009 ------- Childworkspace "otf01" looks good for a OOo 3.2 target. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Bug 465074] New: FTBFS libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 May '09

17 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465074 Summary: FTBFS libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mo ck-results/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: libXfontcache AssignedTo: sandmann(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: ftbfs(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: sandmann(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 463452 Classification: Fedora libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 May '09

17 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #6 from Johan Cwiklinski <johan(a)x-tnd.be> 2009-05-17 14:09:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344341) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344341) SPECFILE patch for upgrade to 1.7.4 and removing fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 May '09

17 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #5 from Johan Cwiklinski <johan(a)x-tnd.be> 2009-05-17 14:08:27 EDT --- Apperently, fonts shipped in the package are never used, if I have understand shipped fonts are only used if 'dist_with_fonts' make flag is set, which is not the case here. Well, so, I've rebuild the whole package to the latest version, with fonts removed ; it builds and runs correctly under F-10 ; I'll attach the patch for specfile here ; hope that will help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 May '09

16 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-05-16 05:25:26 EDT --- This package is currently a bundle of fonts collected from different sources with different licenses. Our font packaging guidelines would call for some splitting here (terminus-fonts is an example of mono-bitmap-font package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.86, 1.87 pango.spec, 1.160, 1.161 sources, 1.87, 1.88
by Matthias Clasen 15 May '09

15 May '09

Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv780 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: 1.24.2 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.86 retrieving revision 1.87 diff -u -p -r1.86 -r1.87 --- .cvsignore 14 Apr 2009 00:12:00 -0000 1.86 +++ .cvsignore 16 May 2009 00:27:32 -0000 1.87 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.24.1.tar.bz2 +pango-1.24.2.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.160 retrieving revision 1.161 diff -u -p -r1.160 -r1.161 --- pango.spec 18 Apr 2009 12:32:33 -0000 1.160 +++ pango.spec 16 May 2009 00:27:32 -0000 1.161 @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.24.1 -Release: 1%{?dist}.1 +Version: 1.24.2 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 @@ -225,10 +225,13 @@ fi %changelog +* Fri May 15 2009 Karsten Hopp <karsten(a)redhat.com> 1.24.2-1 +- Update to 1.24.2 +- See http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-1.24.2.news + * Sat Apr 18 2009 Karsten Hopp <karsten(a)redhat.com> 1.24.1-1.1 - autoconf uses ibm-linux not redhat-linux (s390x) - * Mon Apr 13 2009 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> - 1.24.1-1 - Update to 1.24.1 - See http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-1.24.1.news Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.87 retrieving revision 1.88 diff -u -p -r1.87 -r1.88 --- sources 14 Apr 2009 00:12:00 -0000 1.87 +++ sources 16 May 2009 00:27:32 -0000 1.88 @@ -1 +1 @@ -af0beac1dd1825e241c5728081f16acd pango-1.24.1.tar.bz2 +7bc6c884d847cabc613e4c6d663771f5 pango-1.24.2.tar.bz2

1 0

[Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback)
by meywer＠openoffice.org 15 May '09

15 May '09

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 ------- Additional comments from meywer(a)openoffice.org Fri May 15 20:38:20 +0000 2009 ------- Once more I want to say, that its really not nice, to get awful nasty boxes instead of letters printing a document, which is shown nice at the screen without any warning!!! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 May '09

15 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |492510 --- Comment #38 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-15 15:12:27 EDT --- Whoops, wrong bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 May '09

15 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting(a)redhat.com Blocks|492510 | --- Comment #37 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-15 15:11:46 EDT --- This font is no longer installed by default, so removing from the blocker list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 479673] New: Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 May '09

15 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479673 Summary: Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: hedayat(a)grad.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: In Fedora 10, when I set the system locale to fa_IR (Persian Language) and log in to gnome many things are larger which results in an ugly desktop. Gnome panel's minimum height which is 24 in en_US locale is 29 in fa_IS locale. Windows' title bars are also are larger (more height). The worst thing is that these sizes do not depend on the selected font! Totally, the desktop is uglier in fa_IR locale. Things are still not that bad till now, but in Eclipse when you enable "show print margin" option in its text editor settings, the line which is intended to show the 80 character margin appears in the middle of the editor, around character 50. In en_US locale, it appears in the correct position. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In the gdm login screen, select Persian language and login 2.You can see that gnome applet is larger, and larger icons appear in it as a result 3.Run eclipse and enable "show print margin", in its text editor preferences. 4. The print margin in eclipse appears in the middle of the text editor area, which is around character 50, while it should appear at the end of 80th character. Expected results: Normal window sizes and correct estimation of print margin in eclipse text editor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 15 May '09

15 May '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #93 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc(a)ocallahan.org> 2009-05-15 04:09:57 PDT --- Filed bug 493202 on comment #53. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 488398] New: /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.zh_* refers to *.ttf instead of *.ttc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 May '09

15 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.zh_* refers to *.ttf instead of *.ttc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 Summary: /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.zh_* refers to *.ttf instead of *.ttc Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cjkunifonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: htl10(a)users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*map.zh_* refers to *.ttf instead of *.ttc, causing printing or viewing of cjk pdf without embedded cjk fonts to not work. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10.noarch cjkunifonts-ukai-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10.noarch Additional info: This seems to be an small oversight of the packager when the unifonts changes from ttf in 0.1.x to ttc in 0.2.x ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.10,1.11
by cchance 15 May '09

15 May '09

Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6100 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: rebuilt Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 15 May 2009 05:18:45 -0000 1.10 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 15 May 2009 05:37:58 -0000 1.11 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ the CJK Unifonts project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 24%{?dist} +Release: 25%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -229,7 +229,10 @@ cd - %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog -* Fri May 15 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-24.fc11 +* Fri May 15 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-25.fc12 +- Rebuilt. + +* Fri May 15 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-24.fc12 - Resolves: rhbz#488398 (Fixed ghostscript referred to outdated font location.) * Wed Apr 08 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11

1 0

rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW, 1.2, 1.3 cjkuni-fonts.spec, 1.9, 1.10
by cchance 15 May '09

15 May '09

Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv848 Modified Files: FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: resoles: rhbz#488398 (fixed ghostscript referred to oudated location) Index: FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW 3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000 1.2 +++ FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW 15 May 2009 05:18:45 -0000 1.3 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % -/ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; % -/Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 8 Apr 2009 03:28:23 -0000 1.9 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 15 May 2009 05:18:45 -0000 1.10 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ the CJK Unifonts project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 23%{?dist} +Release: 24%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ cd - %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri May 15 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-24.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#488398 (Fixed ghostscript referred to outdated font location.) + * Wed Apr 08 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#483320 (Declared ownership of compatibility directories.)

1 0

[Bug 500941] New: [si_LK][GSUB]U+0DB9 U+0DCA U+200D U+0DBA shape font has error
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 May '09

14 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [si_LK][GSUB]U+0DB9 U+0DCA U+200D U+0DBA shape font has error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500941 Summary: [si_LK][GSUB]U+0DB9 U+0DCA U+200D U+0DBA shape font has error Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U+0DB9 U+0DCA U+200D U+0DBA with RAW CODE,the font shape is not correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0DB9 U+0DCA U+200D U+0DBA with RAW CODE,it shows ඹ්‍ය Actual results: The font shape is not correct. Expected result: The font shape should be correct. Additional info: Please see the attachment of correct font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 May '09

14 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> 2009-05-14 21:00:31 EDT --- Pretty sure we're good now, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 May '09

14 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 Steven M. Parrish <tuxbrewr(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 378338] Deal with X servers which misreport the screen's dimensions
by gnome-control-center (bugzilla.gnome.org) 14 May '09

14 May '09

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378338 gnome-control-center | settings-daemon | Ver: trunk Jeremy Nickurak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gnome- | |bugs(a)atrus.rifetech.com -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378338.

1 0

[Bug 468565] Checkbox won't select on fillable PDF
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 May '09

14 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468565 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jürgens <martin(a)gamesplace.info> 2009-05-14 07:21:52 EDT --- *** Bug 418651 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 500751] gnome-terminal does not display in bold with Terminus as font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '09

13 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500751 --- Comment #5 from Ian Weller <ian(a)ianweller.org> 2009-05-13 22:02:33 EDT --- thanks for clearing up which package has the problem. the emboldened version at the font sizes i mentioned looked just fine, was still quite readable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 500751] gnome-terminal does not display in bold with Terminus as font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '09

13 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500751 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh | |at.com, | |rhbugs(a)n-dimensional.de Component|gnome-terminal |terminus-font AssignedTo|besfahbo(a)redhat.com |rhbugs(a)n-dimensional.de --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-13 20:00:32 EDT --- terminus at 8px has the same glyphs for Medium and Bold. -> font bug But srsly, at that size what do you want them to do? Now, IF that bold font is removed, vte will use freetype's emboldening I guess. In previous releases (F10 and older I guess) we were always using emboldening and never tried to use the bold typeface. So it "worked" before. But I'm not sure emboldened 8px font is any readable. Anyway, it's out of my jurisdiction. Reassigning to terminus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 462531] New: text of highlighted button in dialog goes black
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '09

13 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: text of highlighted button in dialog goes black https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462531 Summary: text of highlighted button in dialog goes black Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jspaar(a)users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: On XO running fedora rawhide livecd, The highlighted button in a dialog (any app) looks black while the dialog window is in focus. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): I'm not sure which underlying component is responsible. Here are candidates chosen from zenity's dependencies: cairo-1.7.4-1.fc10.i386 fontconfig-2.6.0-2.fc10.i386 freetype-2.3.7-1.fc10.i386 gtk2-2.14.0-4.fc10.i386 glib2-2.18.0-1.fc10.i386 libglade2-2.6.3-1.fc10.i386 glib2-2.18.0-1.fc10.i386 libgnomecanvas-2.20.1.1-2.fc9.i386 glib2-2.18.0-1.fc10.i386 gtk2-2.14.0-4.fc10.i386 pango-1.21.6-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Boot fedora rawhide livecd on XO per http://katzj.livejournal.com/438184.html 2. Log in to gdm and open any dialog, such as System->shutdown 3. or run: zenity --question --text 'do you like pirate buttons?' --ok-label='Aaargh!' --cancel-label='Naargh!' 3. Actual results: While the dialog window is in focus, the *text* in the highlighted button appears blacked out. Tabbing to a different button will move the effect to that button. Focussing on a different window will remove the effect until the dialog is in focus again. Notice that in buttons with an icon and text, the icon is not blacked out, only the text. Expected results: visible text on highlighted button while dialog window is active Additional info: Screenshot attached. Intended to block FedoraOnXO Tracker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=FedoraOnXO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 500560] New: [si_LK][GPOS] U0DA2 U0DDB font shape has error
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '09

13 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [si_LK][GPOS] U0DA2 U0DDB font shape has error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500560 Summary: [si_LK][GPOS] U0DA2 U0DDB font shape has error Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U0DA2+U0DDB with RAW CODE,the font shape is not correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U0DA2+U0DDB with RAW CODE Actual results: The font shape is not correct. Expected result: The font shape should be correct. Additional info: Please see the attachment of correct font and error font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '09

12 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #36 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-12 22:27:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > But you do realize, in the end, there only exists one font order, no matter > which way you set it. It is impossible for two fonts to be both preferred if > they are both installed. If you want to control the orders by the presence of > fonts, you can do exactly the same thing with a centralized conf file. The only > difference is that a single config file gives you a master fallback list, and > what you suggested determines this list ad-hoc, which is more difficult to > predict and debug. That's the policy to not mess up. > IMHO, this is impossible. If you set <prefer> or use prepend/prepend_first, you > ARE affecting other font packages. Indeed, that's how fontconfig works. Again, > for a given system state, there is only one priority list for each language, no > matter you set it from a single file, or by a bunch of font-specific files. Right. I meant language, but not font packages. sorry. > It's not dependency, it is fallback relationship. If you set priority as A>B>C > and some of them do not present, fontconfig will pick up the next one with the > highest priority. I think that's how fontconfig was designed. At least you should do as long as you expect them to get it working. otherwise you just leave it to outside your rule. If you have a dependency in the package, the referred font package owner or that package owner can realizes any attentions is needed when something is changed. you can prevent the font naming issue you've faced in wqy-bitmap-fonts say. > If you check my old posts, I used to be a supporter to font-specific config > files, because I know the fonts I maintained are good, but other high priority > fonts prevent the use of these good one but I have no control (for exp. > 65-nonlatin). I endured a lot of troubles in order to set my own list. Now I am > suggesting to get things right from the very beginning, and save time of the > font maintainers. In you really want to insist, you can still do what you have > been doing, but having a up-to-date default language-specific font list will > greatly reduce the amount of work you need to do. Yes, but what you are suggesting is actually the same thing what fontconfig does because both are centralized management. why you feel it's comfortable is, you're about to get an control of it. it's not necessarily a happy solution for everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Issue 16032] OOo should support optional OpenType features
by obr＠openoffice.org 12 May '09

12 May '09

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16032 User obr changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe |in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli|in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli |vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo|vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo |rafonts,goranrakic,haktar,|rafonts,goranrakic,haktar, |hdu,hin,iorsh,jbfaure,jeev|hdu,hin,iorsh,jbfaure,jeev |esbond,jlp,kami_,manens,ma|esbond,jlp,kami_,manens,ma |sayan,moyogo,munzirtaha,nu|sayan,moyogo,munzirtaha,nu |sorn,obr,ousia,rabauke,ral|sorn,ousia,rabauke,ralphie |phie,samphan,scottchiefbak|,samphan,scottchiefbaker,s |er,silverex,simos,uto |ilverex,simos,utomo99 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Bug 495252] Texts/Fonts are crappy.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '09

12 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495252 Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating(a)redhat.com Blocks|497399(F11XorgBlocker) |446451(F11Target) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Issue 16032] OOo should support optional OpenType features
by scottchiefbaker＠openoffice.org 12 May '09

12 May '09

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16032 User scottchiefbaker changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe |in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli|in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli |vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo|vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo |rafonts,goranrakic,haktar,|rafonts,goranrakic,haktar, |hdu,hin,iorsh,jbfaure,jeev|hdu,hin,iorsh,jbfaure,jeev |esbond,jlp,kami_,manens,ma|esbond,jlp,kami_,manens,ma |sayan,moyogo,munzirtaha,nu|sayan,moyogo,munzirtaha,nu |sorn,obr,ousia,rabauke,ral|sorn,obr,ousia,rabauke,ral |phie,samphan,silverex,simo|phie,samphan,scottchiefbak |s,utomo99' |er,silverex,simos,uto -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
by scottchiefbaker＠openoffice.org 12 May '09

12 May '09

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User scottchiefbaker changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'arielch,awagner_mainz,bah|'arielch,awagner_mainz,bah |ein,benjamin_schallar,bern|ein,benjamin_schallar,bern |d_schoeler,ceplm,chrullric|d_schoeler,ceplm,chrullric |h,ckolivas,cwoollard,fedor|h,ckolivas,cwoollard,fedor |afonts,iorsh,jeongkyu,masa|afonts,iorsh,jeongkyu,masa |yan,msundman,simos' |yan,msundman,scottchiefbak | |er,simos' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '09

12 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #35 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-12 10:43:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > It just works for your desired packages. but not for someone's. that's not a > neutral solution. But you do realize, in the end, there only exists one font order, no matter which way you set it. It is impossible for two fonts to be both preferred if they are both installed. If you want to control the orders by the presence of fonts, you can do exactly the same thing with a centralized conf file. The only difference is that a single config file gives you a master fallback list, and what you suggested determines this list ad-hoc, which is more difficult to predict and debug. > we can suggest the default font in comps. but someone may not > likes that. the centralized management for the rule would prevents to use the > preferred font packages for users. I'm afraid you can't maintain/update it > without painful for you and everyone nor without any notice from the font > package maintainers. > > > The point I'm saying is: > > * Do not make any changes that affects to the other font packages. > -> this can be solved to apply the rule for the specific language. IMHO, this is impossible. If you set <prefer> or use prepend/prepend_first, you ARE affecting other font packages. Indeed, that's how fontconfig works. Again, for a given system state, there is only one priority list for each language, no matter you set it from a single file, or by a bunch of font-specific files. > > * Do not make any changes that depends on the other font packages. otherwise it > must has certain dependencies in the package. It's not dependency, it is fallback relationship. If you set priority as A>B>C and some of them do not present, fontconfig will pick up the next one with the highest priority. I think that's how fontconfig was designed. > > * Maintaining all of the font packages available on Fedora at the centralized > fontconfig rule isn't realistic. as fontconfig is capable to read the rule from > each fonts, maintaining it in each font packages with the certain policy would > works enough. If you check my old posts, I used to be a supporter to font-specific config files, because I know the fonts I maintained are good, but other high priority fonts prevent the use of these good one but I have no control (for exp. 65-nonlatin). I endured a lot of troubles in order to set my own list. Now I am suggesting to get things right from the very beginning, and save time of the font maintainers. In you really want to insist, you can still do what you have been doing, but having a up-to-date default language-specific font list will greatly reduce the amount of work you need to do. > > Right now some font packages doesn't follow even current policy. we have to > mass-file a bug for them in F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 331881] [Indic] ra+halant+ZWNJ is wrongly rendering
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '09

12 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331881 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen(a)redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-12 08:38:21 EDT --- Does this still exist in F11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
by awagner_mainz＠openoffice.org 12 May '09

12 May '09

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User awagner_mainz changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'arielch,bahein,benjamin_s|'arielch,awagner_mainz,bah |challar,bernd_schoeler,cep|ein,benjamin_schallar,bern |lm,chrullrich,ckolivas,cwo|d_schoeler,ceplm,chrullric |ollard,fedorafonts,iorsh,j|h,ckolivas,cwoollard,fedor |eongkyu,masayan,msundman,s|afonts,iorsh,jeongkyu,masa |imos' |yan,msundman,simos' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '09

12 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #34 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-12 03:25:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > (In reply to comment #32) > > Sure. so how is it better than applying it with the package installation then? > > To activate rules when installing font package is still possible with > centralized approach. Just check out how WenQuanYi Bitmap Song is configured in > Bug#499902. It just works for your desired packages. but not for someone's. that's not a neutral solution. we can suggest the default font in comps. but someone may not likes that. the centralized management for the rule would prevents to use the preferred font packages for users. I'm afraid you can't maintain/update it without painful for you and everyone nor without any notice from the font package maintainers. The point I'm saying is: * Do not make any changes that affects to the other font packages. -> this can be solved to apply the rule for the specific language. * Do not make any changes that depends on the other font packages. otherwise it must has certain dependencies in the package. * Maintaining all of the font packages available on Fedora at the centralized fontconfig rule isn't realistic. as fontconfig is capable to read the rule from each fonts, maintaining it in each font packages with the certain policy would works enough. Right now some font packages doesn't follow even current policy. we have to mass-file a bug for them in F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '09

12 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #33 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-12 01:09:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > Sure. so how is it better than applying it with the package installation then? To activate rules when installing font package is still possible with centralized approach. Just check out how WenQuanYi Bitmap Song is configured in Bug#499902. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #32 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-12 00:55:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > I don't think so. I am not saying this must be included in fontconfig upstream > (which get updated slowly), we can certainly create a new package which only > include these CJK specific config files. Even fontconfig have similar files, we > can still ship something to override if it gets updated. But the key idea is > not to let individual font to do this. Functional-wise, they are completely > equivalent. I have never been saying about fontconfig upstream but the centralized management is painful to maintain. > Either way does not prevent people from customizing their own list. As I said, > they are simply equivalent. Sure. so how is it better than applying it with the package installation then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #31 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-12 00:32:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > that idea is hard to maintain the rule. as you are aware, even current rule is > outdated. maintaining it in the font packages with the accurate policy would > rather be better than centralized management. I don't think so. I am not saying this must be included in fontconfig upstream (which get updated slowly), we can certainly create a new package which only include these CJK specific config files. Even fontconfig have similar files, we can still ship something to override if it gets updated. But the key idea is not to let individual font to do this. Functional-wise, they are completely equivalent. > aside from that, it just reflects > your favorite someone may not likes. one could do modify it any time, but it > may breaks after updating or causes the unwanted file creation on the packaging > management system. applying the necessary rules with installing the package > would be easier and intuitive. Either way does not prevent people from customizing their own list. As I said, they are simply equivalent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #30 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-11 22:38:51 EDT --- that idea is hard to maintain the rule. as you are aware, even current rule is outdated. maintaining it in the font packages with the accurate policy would rather be better than centralized management. aside from that, it just reflects your favorite someone may not likes. one could do modify it any time, but it may breaks after updating or causes the unwanted file creation on the packaging management system. applying the necessary rules with installing the package would be easier and intuitive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 500112] New: [te_IN][Consonants]Press backspace key it can't delete the whole char
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN][Consonants]Press backspace key it can't delete the whole char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500112 Summary: [te_IN][Consonants]Press backspace key it can't delete the whole char Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it can't delete the whole char Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U 0929 with Raw code,it will show ऩ 2.Press backspace key to delete the whole char Actual results: It can't delete the whole char Expected results: It should can delete the whole chare Additional info: U+0929 ऩ U+0931 ऱ U+0934 ऴ U+0958 क़ U+0959 ख़ U+095A ग़ U+095B ज़ U+095C ड़ U+095D ढ़ U+095E फ़ U+095F य़ all have the same problem in Consonants. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 499777] New: [or_IN][pango] GSUB Delete U+0B5C/U+0B5D need pressing Backspace key twice
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [or_IN][pango] GSUB Delete U+0B5C/U+0B5D need pressing Backspace key twice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499777 Summary: [or_IN][pango] GSUB Delete U+0B5C/U+0B5D need pressing Backspace key twice Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Delete U+0B5C/U+0B5D by Backspace key,we need pressing Backspace key twice to delete the font Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit press 0B5C ଡ଼ 2.Press Backspace key to delete it 3. Actual results: User must press Backspace key twice to delete it Expected results: User should press Backspace key only once to delete it. Additional info: 0B5D also has this problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 500099] New: [ml_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500099 Summary: [ml_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input dabenാ 2.Press the cursor to the right and press Backspace key to delete the whole char ാ Actual results: It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char. Additional info: Dependent Vowels all have same problem 1 U+0D3E ാ 2 U+0D3F ി 3 U+0D40 ീ 4 U+0D41 ു 5 U+0D42 ൂ 6 U+0D43 ൃ 7 U+0D46 െ 8 U+0D47 േ 9 U+0D48 ൈ 10 U+0D4A ൊ 11 U+0D4B ോ 12 U+0D4C ൌ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 500100] New: [ml_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500100 Summary: [ml_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input dabenം 2.Press the cursor to the right and press Backspace key to delete the whole char ം It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char Additional info: 1.U+0D02 ം 2.U+0D03 ഃ 3.U+0D4D ് 4.U+0D57 ൗ all have similar problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 499775] New: [or_IN][pango] GSUB Delete U+0B3E by backspace will delete other letters except ା
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [or_IN][pango] GSUB Delete U+0B3E by backspace will delete other letters except ା https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499775 Summary: [or_IN][pango] GSUB Delete U+0B3E by backspace will delete other letters except ା Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: GSUB Delete U+0B3E by backspace will delete other letters before it except ା Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input abcା 2.Press backspace key to delete the font "ା" 3. Actual results: It will delete both letter "c" before it and font "ା" Expected results: It will only delete font "ା" Additional info: 1. U+0B3E ା 2. U+0B3F ି 3. U+0B40 ୀ 4. U+0B41 ୁ 5. U+0B42 ୂ 6. U+0B43 ୃ 7. U+0B47 େ 8. U+0B48 ୈ 9. U+0B4B ୋ 10. U+0B4C ୌ 11. U+0B56 ୖ 12. U+0B57 ୗ 13. U+0B01 ଁ 14. U+0B02 ଂ 15. U+0B03 ଃ 16. U+0B3C ଼ 17. U+0B4D ୍ 18. U+0B56 ୖ 19. U+0B57 ୗ these fonts all have similar problems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 500117] New: [hi_IN][Additional Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][Additional Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500117 Summary: [hi_IN][Additional Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input dabenॢ 2.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char ॢ Actual results: It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char. Additional info: 1 U+0962 ॢ 2 U+0963 ॣ All have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 481423, which changed state. Bug 481423 Summary: [OpenJDK] Adapt to F11 fonts packaging changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481423 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 481423] New: [OpenJDK] Adapt to F11 fonts packaging changes
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [OpenJDK] Adapt to F11 fonts packaging changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481423 Summary: [OpenJDK] Adapt to F11 fonts packaging changes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk AssignedTo: langel(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dbhole(a)redhat.com, mark(a)klomp.org, langel(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk Blocks: 477044 Classification: Fedora A huge font repackaging operation is ongoing in Rawhide. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Repackaging_of_Fedora_fonts IIRC java is still not 100% fontconfig-ified and depends on font files location. Please check before each Alpha/Beta/Test releases the distro font changes have not broken something openjdk-side -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 500116] New: [hi_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500116 Summary: [hi_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input dabenँ 2.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char Actual results: It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char. Additional info: U+0901 ँ U+0902 ं U+0903 ः U+093C ़ U+094D ् all have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 499806] New: [te_IN][Various Signs]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN][Various Signs]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499806 Summary: [te_IN][Various Signs]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input dabenఁ 2.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char ఁ Actual results: It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char. Additional info: 1.U+0C01 ఁ 2. U+0C02 ం 3. U+0C03 ః 4. U+0C4D ్ 5. U+0C55 ౕ 6. U+0C56 ౖ all have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 499804] New: [te_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499804 Summary: [te_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input dabenి 2.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char ి Actual results: It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char. Additional info: Dependent Vowels 1. U+0C3F ి 2. U+0C40 ీ 3. U+0C41 ు 4. U+0C42 ూ 5. U+0C43 ృ 6. U+0C44 ౄ 7. U+0C46 ె 8. U+0C47 ే 9. U+0C48 ై 10. U+0C4A ొ 11. U+0C4B ో 12. U+0C4C ౌ all have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477401, which changed state. Bug 477401 Summary: [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 477401] [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '09

11 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2009-05-11 02:13:53 EDT --- This is all done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

rpms/fontconfig/F-11 fontconfig.spec,1.131,1.132 sources,1.45,1.46
by Behdad Esfahbod 08 May '09

08 May '09

Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23046 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Tue May 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo(a)redhat.com> - * 2.6.99.behdad.20090508↪-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 - Resolves #497984 Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/F-11/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.131 retrieving revision 1.132 diff -u -p -r1.131 -r1.132 --- fontconfig.spec 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.131 +++ fontconfig.spec 8 May 2009 20:19:54 -0000 1.132 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090318 +Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ fi %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue May 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo(a)redhat.com> - 2.6.99.behdad.20090508-1 +- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 +- Resolves #497984 + * Tue Mar 18 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo(a)redhat.com> - 2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090318 - Resolves #490888 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.45 retrieving revision 1.46 diff -u -p -r1.45 -r1.46 --- sources 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.45 +++ sources 8 May 2009 20:19:54 -0000 1.46 @@ -1 +1 @@ -6f2ecfcd695f3f7ec32ae7bdfe438b33 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318.tar.gz +8e04b95bfb69a2dba947dd0cfc61b5f0 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090508.tar.gz

1 0

rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.42, 1.43 fontconfig.spec, 1.131, 1.132 sources, 1.45, 1.46
by Behdad Esfahbod 08 May '09

08 May '09

Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20888 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Tue May 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo(a)redhat.com> - * 2.6.99.behdad.20090508-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 - Resolves #497984 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.42 retrieving revision 1.43 diff -u -p -r1.42 -r1.43 --- .cvsignore 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.42 +++ .cvsignore 8 May 2009 20:00:25 -0000 1.43 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090508.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.131 retrieving revision 1.132 diff -u -p -r1.131 -r1.132 --- fontconfig.spec 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.131 +++ fontconfig.spec 8 May 2009 20:00:25 -0000 1.132 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090318 +Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ fi %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue May 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo(a)redhat.com> - 2.6.99.behdad.20090508-1 +- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 +- Resolves #497984 + * Tue Mar 18 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo(a)redhat.com> - 2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090318 - Resolves #490888 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.45 retrieving revision 1.46 diff -u -p -r1.45 -r1.46 --- sources 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.45 +++ sources 8 May 2009 20:00:25 -0000 1.46 @@ -1 +1 @@ -6f2ecfcd695f3f7ec32ae7bdfe438b33 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318.tar.gz +8e04b95bfb69a2dba947dd0cfc61b5f0 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090508.tar.gz

1 0

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 May '09

08 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #29 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-08 15:28:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > What's the issue you mind when it's gone from 65-nonlatin.conf? Because it is going completely to the other direction as what I was proposing: I hope to centralize all CJK font order settings into 1) 65-nonlatin and 2) a set of language-specific files. Removing font settings from theses centralized places and scatter these settings into multiple font packages will only increase the chance of conflict. Indeed, I tested my proposal and things are working perfectly. You can find my latest proposal at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499902 and I love to know what you think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 May '09

08 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #28 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-08 03:13:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > > As the suspicious was pointed out the above, I've confirmed getting rid of > > WenQuanYi ZenHei from 65-nonlatin.conf fixes this issue. > > This id definitely not a right fix. Rename your 66-vlgothic config files to 44 > or other numbers will also fix it. But as I said, the only solution is to > coordinate between our config files, not to eliminate the other. No. remember that vlgothic fonts' fontconfig rule is only applied when lang == ja now. if I get rid of it, this numeral prefix race will breaks Chinese rendering. it doesn't solve ANYTHING. furthermore as you suggested the above, the language-selector idea also applies the rules at the same priority for CJK. I thought we have agreed that the difference is it's done by inside fontconfig or outside. if you're right, that would also means that idea won't solve anything then. I don't think so. and actually it works properly if it's gone from 65-nonlatin.conf. What's the issue you mind when it's gone from 65-nonlatin.conf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 May '09

08 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #27 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-08 01:32:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > As the suspicious was pointed out the above, I've confirmed getting rid of > WenQuanYi ZenHei from 65-nonlatin.conf fixes this issue. This id definitely not a right fix. Rename your 66-vlgothic config files to 44 or other numbers will also fix it. But as I said, the only solution is to coordinate between our config files, not to eliminate the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '09

07 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tagoh(a)redhat.com |fangqq(a)gmail.com --- Comment #26 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-07 23:04:00 EDT --- >From Bug #492510: (In reply to comment #51) > Indeed, I don't mind taking wqy-bitmap-fonts out from the default Chinese font > list, and replaced by wqy-zenhei-fonts instead, since zenhei already embedded > all the bitmaps and is smaller in size (disabled by default). > > Then the key question is how to fix the overwritten problem between wqy-zenhei > and vlgothic config files. As the suspicious was pointed out the above, I've confirmed getting rid of WenQuanYi ZenHei from 65-nonlatin.conf fixes this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
by arielch＠openoffice.org 07 May '09

07 May '09

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User arielch changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'bahein,benjamin_schallar,|'arielch,bahein,benjamin_s |bernd_schoeler,ceplm,chrul|challar,bernd_schoeler,cep |lrich,ckolivas,cwoollard,f|lm,chrullrich,ckolivas,cwo |edorafonts,iorsh,jeongkyu,|ollard,fedorafonts,iorsh,j |masayan,msundman,simos' |eongkyu,masayan,msundman,s | |imos' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from arielch(a)openoffice.org Fri May 8 01:27:13 +0000 2009 ------- . --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Bug 499661] New: Includes/Provides directory it MUST NOT
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '09

07 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Includes/Provides directory it MUST NOT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499661 Summary: Includes/Provides directory it MUST NOT Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora $ rpmls -p freetype-devel-2.3.9-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm|grep pkg|grep ^d drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib64/pkgconfig Your package must not include this directory, because this directory belongs into the pkgconfig package(s). This hides broken dependencies in other packages, which expect to pull in pkgconfig by depending on %{_libdir}/pkgconfig. Note: I haven't checked whether the ownership of directories other than %_libdir/pkgconfig is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

rpms/freetype/F-11 freetype.spec,1.72,1.73
by Matthias Clasen 07 May '09

07 May '09

Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7618 Modified Files: freetype.spec Log Message: Don't own /usr/lib/pkgconfig Index: freetype.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/F-11/freetype.spec,v retrieving revision 1.72 retrieving revision 1.73 diff -u -p -r1.72 -r1.73 --- freetype.spec 27 Mar 2009 21:58:58 -0000 1.72 +++ freetype.spec 7 May 2009 21:32:44 -0000 1.73 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine Name: freetype Version: 2.3.9 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} License: FTL or GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.freetype.org @@ -219,13 +219,16 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{_includedir}/*.h %{_libdir}/libfreetype.so %{_bindir}/freetype-config -%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ +%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/freetype2.pc %doc docs/design %doc docs/glyphs %doc docs/reference %doc docs/tutorial %changelog +* Thu May 7 2009 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> 2.3.9-4 +- Don't own /usr/lib/pkgconfig + * Wed Mar 27 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo(a)redhat.com> 2.3.9-3 - Disable subpixel hinting by default. Was turned on unintentionally.

1 0

rpms/freetype/devel freetype.spec,1.72,1.73
by Matthias Clasen 07 May '09

07 May '09

Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6654 Modified Files: freetype.spec Log Message: don't own /usr/lib/pkgconfig Index: freetype.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/freetype.spec,v retrieving revision 1.72 retrieving revision 1.73 diff -u -p -r1.72 -r1.73 --- freetype.spec 27 Mar 2009 21:58:58 -0000 1.72 +++ freetype.spec 7 May 2009 21:28:01 -0000 1.73 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine Name: freetype Version: 2.3.9 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} License: FTL or GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.freetype.org @@ -219,13 +219,16 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{_includedir}/*.h %{_libdir}/libfreetype.so %{_bindir}/freetype-config -%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ +%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/freetype2.pc %doc docs/design %doc docs/glyphs %doc docs/reference %doc docs/tutorial %changelog +* Thu May 7 2009 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> 2.3.9-4 +- Don't own /usr/lib/pkgconfig + * Wed Mar 27 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo(a)redhat.com> 2.3.9-3 - Disable subpixel hinting by default. Was turned on unintentionally.

1 0

[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
by ousia＠openoffice.org 07 May '09

07 May '09

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from ousia(a)openoffice.org Thu May 7 20:16:23 +0000 2009 ------- Since version 3.1 has already been released, the next stable version 3.2 will have this issue solved, won't it? Thanks for your help, Pablo --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '09

07 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2009-05-07 13:59:32 EDT --- 481009 looks stalled-ish. Steven, have you begun work on this yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 May '09

06 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20030323-1.fc10 |20030323-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 May '09

06 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-05-06 19:30:58 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 May '09

06 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20030323-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 May '09

06 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-05-06 19:25:34 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 06 May '09

06 May '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #92 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc(a)ocallahan.org> 2009-05-05 23:38:29 PDT --- Please file a new bug for Windows. This patch was fixed as originally reported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 05 May '09

05 May '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #91 from Josh Lee <jleedev(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-05 21:26:11 PDT --- Just curious, what's the status of this bug? With newer versions of Windows exposing the font scaling setting more prominently to the user, this bug might see more visibility, and it's silly to consider manually overriding laout.css.dpi to be a proper fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 483327] New: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '09

05 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora One or more directories are not included within this package and/or its sub-packages: => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf [...] Further information: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnersh… https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories The script to find unowned directories is not complete yet, but still quite usable: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/dircheck-remote.py $ ./dircheck-remote.py -r rawhide -n ^baekmuk-ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10 CIDFnmap.zh_CN, 1.2, 1.3 CIDFnmap.zh_TW, 1.2, 1.3 FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN, 1.2, 1.3 FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW, 1.2, 1.3 cidfmap.zh_CN, 1.2, 1.3 cidfmap.zh_TW, 1.2, 1.3 cjkunifonts.spec, 1.25, 1.26
by cchance 04 May '09

04 May '09

Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13305 Modified Files: CIDFnmap.zh_CN CIDFnmap.zh_TW FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW cidfmap.zh_CN cidfmap.zh_TW cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: resolves: rhbz#488398 update path name of cidpmaps Index: CIDFnmap.zh_CN =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/CIDFnmap.zh_CN,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- CIDFnmap.zh_CN 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 +++ CIDFnmap.zh_CN 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.3 @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ % Adobe-GB1 -/BousungEG-Light-GB (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) ; -/GBZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) ; +/BousungEG-Light-GB (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) ; +/GBZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc) ; /Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB ; /MSungGBK-Light /BousungEG-Light-GB ; Index: CIDFnmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/CIDFnmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- CIDFnmap.zh_TW 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 +++ CIDFnmap.zh_TW 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.3 @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ % Adobe-CNS1 -/ZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) ; +/ZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc) ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) ; /Adobe-CNS1 /ShanHeiSun-Light ; Index: FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 +++ FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.3 @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % -/BousungEG-Light-GB << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; -/GBZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/BousungEG-Light-GB << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/GBZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; % -/MSungGBK-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; -/Adobe-GB1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/MSungGBK-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/Adobe-GB1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; Index: FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 +++ FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.3 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % -/ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; % -/Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; Index: cidfmap.zh_CN =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/cidfmap.zh_CN,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- cidfmap.zh_CN 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 +++ cidfmap.zh_CN 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -/BousungEG-Light-GB << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; -/GBZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/BousungEG-Light-GB << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/GBZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; /MSungGBK-Light /BousungEG-Light-GB ; /Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB ; Index: cidfmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/cidfmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- cidfmap.zh_TW 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 +++ cidfmap.zh_TW 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/ZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; /Adobe-CNS1 /ShanHeiSun-Light ; Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.25 retrieving revision 1.26 diff -u -p -r1.25 -r1.26 --- cjkunifonts.spec 8 Apr 2009 06:29:46 -0000 1.25 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.26 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 12.fc10 +Release: 13.fc10 Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -203,6 +203,10 @@ fi %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog +* Tue May 05 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - + 0.2.20080216.1-13.fc10 +- Resolves: rhbz#488398 Updated path name of cidfmaps. + * Wed Apr 08 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-12.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#488398 Fixed ghostscript files referred to outdated font info.

1 0

[Bug 485472] New: cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 May '09

04 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Summary: cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cjkunifonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: dwayne(a)translate.org.za QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: cjkunifonts breaks fontforge operation. Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum groupinstall Fonts - ensures we have a standard font install 2. fontforge - breaks 3. yum remove cjkunifonts-uming 4. fontforge - words Actual results: When crashing we get a message like this: Help! Server claimed font -some font file name (I can't remember it) existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Segmentation fault Expected results: fontforge works regardless of whether these fonts are installed. Additional info: A similar problem was reported in bug 450709 against xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 May '09

03 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 01 May '09

01 May '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 philippe <phiw(a)l-c-n.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phiw(a)l-c-n.com --- Comment #186 from philippe <phiw(a)l-c-n.com> 2009-05-01 07:45:51 PDT --- (In reply to comment #185) > Using the 3.5b5pre build from 2009-05-01 on Ubuntu 9.04: > > In these demos: http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2008/webfonts/ , the text > renders as unknown-character glyphs (i.e. the character code inside a box), > after showing briefly in a local font while the page loads. > > I assume those fonts are unusable. However, Firefox doesn't fall back to a font > with a renderable character. Is this the intended behaviour? That is bug 489445, that should land on gecko 1.9.1 (Fx 3.5b) soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 01 May '09

01 May '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #185 from Greg K Nicholson [:gkn] <bugs(a)gkn.me.uk> 2009-05-01 07:40:28 PDT --- Using the 3.5b5pre build from 2009-05-01 on Ubuntu 9.04: In these demos: http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2008/webfonts/ , the text renders as unknown-character glyphs (i.e. the character code inside a box), after showing briefly in a local font while the page loads. I assume those fonts are unusable. However, Firefox doesn't fall back to a font with a renderable character. Is this the intended behaviour? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 20854] OTF is a font format
by bugzilla-daemon＠freedesktop.org 01 May '09

01 May '09

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854 Bastien Nocera <hadess(a)hadess.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |NOTOURBUG --- Comment #6 from Bastien Nocera <hadess(a)hadess.net> 2009-05-01 05:00:31 PST --- It is a bug in the file managers. File a bug against them. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 20854] OTF is a font format
by bugzilla-daemon＠freedesktop.org 01 May '09

01 May '09

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854 --- Comment #5 from Brian Burger <blurdesign(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-01 03:22:15 PST --- Copypasta from one of my comments on the Launchpad bug: This is not a problem with the current Gnome Font Viewer, as is easily proven: 1. Find an OTF font file on your system. 2. If you just double-click on it, OpenOffice attempts to open it, and fails. 2. Right-click the OTF, go Open With -> Open With Other Application -> Font Viewer 3. Font Viewer opens and displays the OTF preview just as it should, exactly like a TTF is shown. So I'm not sure how this bug can be Invalid against all three of the targets currently listed. It's should be valid against at least one, if not all. (The above was all done on Ubuntu 9.04) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 20854] OTF is a font format
by bugzilla-daemon＠freedesktop.org 01 May '09

01 May '09

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854 Brian Burger <blurdesign(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |blurdesign(a)gmail.com Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|NOTOURBUG | --- Comment #4 from Brian Burger <blurdesign(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-01 03:19:32 PST --- https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/338682 Over on Launchpad, Seb Bacher is saying this isn't a Nautilus/file-handling bug. Over here, it's not a mime-type bug. It's got to be one or the other. So which is it? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs May 2009