[Bug 18726] New: RFE: help write locale-specific tests
by bugzilla-daemon＠freedesktop.org
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18726
Summary: RFE: help write locale-specific tests
Product: fontconfig
Version: 2.6
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: medium
Component: library
AssignedTo: keithp(a)keithp.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Due to Han unification there is often a need for font distributors to test if a
font name is requested in a chinese, japanese or korean context. However, there
are many chinese locales and writing an exact match is not possible.
The current pattern (used by Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc) in this case is
<test compare="contains" name="lang">
<string>zh</string>
</test>
but we do not really want to match every locale containing "ze". We want to
match every ze-foo locale, not jze-foo or foo-ze
Please add a documented fonts.conf pattern to fontconfig that allows
distributors to specify such an exact match.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 10 months
[Bug 477054] New: Rebuild against fontpackages-devel depending on fontpackages-filesystem
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Rebuild against fontpackages-devel depending on fontpackages-filesystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054
Summary: Rebuild against fontpackages-devel depending on
fontpackages-filesystem
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 477044
Classification: Fedora
As previously discussed, and approved by FPC and FESCO, common font packaging
stuff has been moved to the fontpackages package.
The filesystem maintainer has been asked to release the corresponding
directories in bug #477046
Please rebuild fontconfig against fontpackages-devel to pick up the directory
names it defines in macros, and depend on fontpackages-filesystem that owns the
directories.
I'll add /etc/fonts to fontpackages to avoid circular deps with fontconfig ASAP
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 1 month
[Bug 501852] New: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852
Summary: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D
U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press
backspace key need 14 times
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
DDescription of problem:
In gedit input U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31
U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D with RAW CODE,then press backspace key,it needs
press 14 times
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.In gedit input U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31
U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D with RAW
CODE,press backspace key
Actual results:
It need press 14 times backspace key to delete the char
Expected result:
It should delete the char with 13 times backspace key
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 11 months
[Bug 18724] New: RFE: font merging
by bugzilla-daemon＠freedesktop.org
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724
Summary: RFE: font merging
Product: fontconfig
Version: 2.6
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: medium
Component: library
AssignedTo: keithp(a)keithp.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Several major fonts like Arial and Droid Sans are created in two parts: a core
multifaced part and an Unicode extension (Arial Unicode, Droid Sans Fallback).
Splitting in two file sets allows people who do not need the extension part to
avoid installing it (since the extension is usually huge)
For historic reasons the two parts use different font family names, even though
from a functional user POW they are just two components of a single family.
There should be a documented way in fontconfig for font distributors to specify
via a config file "font foo is an extension of font bar, use it preferably when
bar is missing glyphs, do not show it as a separate item in font lists and only
allow access to the foo family when an application asks explicitely for it"
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 1 month
[Bug 477418] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: linux-libertine-fonts
AssignedTo: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de, kevin(a)tummy.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Bug 477606] New: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477606
Summary: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: rpmlint
AssignedTo: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: wolfy(a)nobugconsulting.ro, tmz(a)pobox.com,
ville.skytta(a)iki.fi, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Our current font packaging policy requires the installation of TTF/OTF/PFA/PFB
fonts in a subdirectory of %_fontbasedir
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages
Our general packaging policy demands of packagers to create proper font
packages when their app bundles them
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
If an app or bit of code is not fontconfig-aware, it can always package
symlinks pointing to fonts packaged according to our guidelines in
%_fontbasedir space, and depend on the font package providing those files.
A recent audit run revealed that the number of packages bundling fonts is very
high. (repoquery found 159 packages shipping fonts in rawhide, the 2/3rds not
being font packages, see bug #477044)
In many case their packagers were not even aware they were bundling fonts (bug
#477406#c4). Some of them are licensing problems (477384#c4)
To prevent such problems in the future, rpmlint should flag any package that
installs ttf/otf/pfa/pfb fonts outside the %_fontbasedir tree, or bundle those
files with binaries in /usr/bin, /usr/lib?? and such.
Packages that include symlinks to files in the %_fontbasedir tree are ok,
though they should also get a warning so upstream adds fontconfig support to
its code (since it has near universal adoption and continuing to ignore
fontconfig will only add to the packager problems in the long run)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg/34322/focus=34335
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 4 months
[Bug 487581] New: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining Diacritical Marks.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining Diacritical Marks.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487581
Summary: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining
Diacritical Marks.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: adam.buchbinder(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6)
Gecko/2009020911 Ubuntu/8.10 (intrepid) Firefox/3.0.6
According to the bug on freedesktop.org (link below), Liberation Mono has an
incorrect spacing definition for "Combining Diacritical Marks"; they should
have zero space, and should render above the last letter, not the next one.
Paste following text with selected font:
Correct: accent above o
Incorrect: accent above g
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Enter a string with a combining diacritic mark in Liberation Mono, e.g.,
"o̍g". Don't use gnome-terminal; it relies on vte, which doesn't handle
combining characters. Use something like gedit; switching fonts will reveal the
issue as the diacritical mark switches places.
Actual Results:
The diacritic appears one letter to the right of where it should be.
Expected Results:
The diacritic should appear in the proper place.
I'm using ttf-liberation 1.04.93-1 on Ubuntu Intrepid; I'm filing this as an
upstream bug. If this should be filed elsewhere, please let me know.
I'm filing this because several monospace fonts have incorrect spacing for
"Combining Diacritical Marks":
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20330
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 6 months
[Bug 485569] New: x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485569
Summary: x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: john.ellson(a)comcast.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
After various font rpm churn on rawhide my 32 bit application would crash with
a malloc failure because of a messed up font cache.
One could wonder:
a) why is the 32 bit cache different from the 64 bit?
b) why isn't fontconfig keeping them both uptodate?
but I have a simpler request:
"man fc-cache" states:
Note that fc-cache must be executed once per architecture to generate
font information customized for that architecture.
but it isn't possible to do this on x86_64 because only the 64 bit version of
/usr/bin/fc-cache is installed, even if both i386 and x86_64 fontconfig rpms
are installed.
** Request that /usr/bin/fc-cache-64 and /usr/bin/fc-cache-32 both be
installed, and that a new /usr/bin/fc-cache shell script be created that runs
them both.
The man page also says:
On a subsequent run, fc-cache will augment the cache information
files with the information for the new architecture.
but apparently this didn't work through some series of font rpm upgrades.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. cd /var/cache/fontconfig
2. rm *
3. fc-cache
Actual results:
Only *x86-64.cache-2 files created
Expected results:
Both *x86.cache-2 and *x86-64.cache-2 files created
Additional info:
Any ugly workaround to the current situation is:
rpm -e --nodeps --allmatches fontconfig fontconfig-devel
yum install fontconfig.i386
fc-cache
yum install fontconfig.x86_64 fontconfig-devel.x86_64
fc-cache
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 7 months