fonts-bugs July 2009

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

25 participants
519 discussions

[Issue 31764] Need to support GPOS kerning
by nmailhot＠openoffice.org 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31764 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot(a)openoffice.org Wed Jul 1 19:38:29 +0000 2009 ------- @phil82: please expand on any problem you know of pango-side in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587506 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #198 from Lars Gunther <webmaster(a)keryx.se> 2009-07-01 11:11:18 PDT --- This was originally brought to my attention from by Erik Dahlström of Opera and the SVG WG. He knows way much more about this than I do, and I will bring this discussion to his attention. It is over my head, and I frankly do not have the time to debug this right now. The testcase at m8y.org does fail in Opera 10 beta. (P.S. Sorry for my bad spelling. Absent minded while typing...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 410678] Linux Footprint
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410678 Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 419962] CSS font-weight:bolder support
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419962 Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #197 from bugs(a)m8y.org 2009-07-01 08:35:02 PDT --- Only a couple of the fonts are "failing" Given this bug, if you scroll back through the many many comments, discusses various bugs in true type fonts, and given the Tuffy font loads, I'm inclined to suspect the fonts that don't load are proooobably buggy. BTW, Lars, did you try my http://m8y.org/tmp/testcase124.svg in Opera? I'm about to file a bug against Webkit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #196 from Lars Gunther <webmaster(a)keryx.se> 2009-07-01 08:17:18 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=386286) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=386286) Sidia by side comparison of Minefiield (3.6 1 July) and Opera 10 beta of SVG using @font and TTF fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #195 from Lars Gunther <webmaster(a)keryx.se> 2009-07-01 08:14:15 PDT --- Re #193: The test case I was referring to is not about SVG fonts. It is about using the CSS declaration @font-face in SVG files, like so: @font-face { font-family: tuffy; src: url(ryanlerch_-_Tuffy_Bold.ttf) format("truetype"); } Comment #192 was probably badly worded. Re #194: The test case does indeed fail in Firefox 3.5 and Minefield. I will attach a screen grab. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 481434] New: Symbol U+0431 looks blurry
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Symbol U+0431 looks blurry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 Summary: Symbol U+0431 looks blurry Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: sergei(a)regolit.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=329915) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329915) The difference before old and new glyph. Description of problem: Symbol U+0431 (russian letter “б”) looks bad since revision 877cd82cc8ef4b7f9f1b3645ad0dd54efe60e3fb. In that revision glyph's shape was altered but hint instructions were not. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Render string containing symbol "б" with antialiasing turned on and compare with revision before 877cd82cc8ef4b7f9f1b3645ad0dd54efe60e3fb. Actual results: Expected results: Normal shape is expected. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #194 from bugs(a)m8y.org 2009-07-01 07:26:35 PDT --- Lars, I'm a bit confused SVG fonts is unrelated to CSS fonts in SVG. The testcase you linked to, the CSS font embedded in the SVG works just fine in Firefox. http://m8y.org/tmp/testcase124.svg A simpler testcase, also tested data URI embedded font, does *NOT* work in Opera 10 - I'm actually a bit puzzled by this. It also fails in Safari 4. It does, however, work just fine in Firefox. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Issue 103157] Liberation Fonts v1.04 have no kerning tables
by hdu＠openoffice.org 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103157 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|NEW |RESOLVED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |INVALID -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Liberation Fonts v1.04 wit|Liberation Fonts v1.04 hav |hout kerning |e no kerning tables -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu(a)openoffice.org Wed Jul 1 09:18:19 +0000 2009 ------- Liberation 1.00 to 1.03 contained the traditional kern tables, but 1.04 did neither contain them nor their newer GPOS.kern counterparts. Version 1.05 provides kerning details only via GPOS, but not via the traditional tables. Since 1.05 onyl uses the "pair adjustment" type of GPOS.kern there is no good reason they do not also provide the traditional tables. Especially when considering the OpenType 1.06 specification, which is quite clear on that topic: "Fonts intended for cross-platform use or for the Windows platform in general should conform to the 'kern' table format". I support this notion. @fyva: if you use fontforge to create your fonts please do not forget to enable the "Traditional Kerning" checkbox in File->GenerateFonts->Options->SFNT It would be even better if you used a version of fontforge that has my patch from issue 102911 applied. Other than that there is the enhancement issue 31764 for OOo to use GPOS.kern instead of SFNT.kern. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs July 2009