fonts-bugs July 2009

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

25 participants
519 discussions

[Bug 504495] New: New official release available, including Literacy and Literacy Compact
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New official release available, including Literacy and Literacy Compact https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504495 Summary: New official release available, including Literacy and Literacy Compact Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: sil-doulos-fonts AssignedTo: roozbeh(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: tahder04(a)schlaegel.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora http://scripts.sil.org/DoulosSILFont > Doulos SIL 4.106 > 2009-04-29 http://scripts.sil.org/SILEntityFonts > Doulos SIL Literacy 4.106 > 2009-05-19 > Doulos SIL Literacy Compact 4.106 > 2009-05-19 There is a new official release available. Also, there is a literacy version available, and a compact literacy version available. I don't know the font policies, but I would recommend packaging all three separately. Then F10 users could use the new font and have the literacy package pulled in so there is no loss of the literacy font. Note: At SIL upstream, Charis Literacy and Doulos Literacy are combined into a single download. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 503427] New: postrm scriptlet assumes /etc/pango/ARCH-redhat-linux-gnu exists
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: postrm scriptlet assumes /etc/pango/ARCH-redhat-linux-gnu exists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503427 Summary: postrm scriptlet assumes /etc/pango/ARCH-redhat-linux-gnu exists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: dcantrell(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- I installed the i586 pango package on my system to try out picasa. Didn't like it, so I removed picasa and the required i586 packages. Removing pango generated this message: Erasing : pango 13/27 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7R5mvR: line 24: /etc/pango/i386-redhat-linux-gnu/pango.modules: No such file or directory I only have /etc/pango/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu on my system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 502577] New: CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502577 Summary: CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: thoger(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in all affected branches. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in "Blocks" field. bug #491384: CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows When creating a Bodhi update request, please include the bug IDs of the respective parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product. Please mention CVE ids in the RPM changelog when available and only close this bug once all affected Fedora versions are fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 495820] New: numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495820 Summary: numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: dejavu-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net ReportedBy: cje(a)btinternet.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: in the default font and size used in firstboot the '5' digit is a slightly different width, i think. so in the 'date and time' settings screen the text shuffles a bit as the seconds and minutes tick through 05/15/25 etc. ah, actually, it looks like it's a hinting problem - this happens with 'full' and 'medium' but not with 'slight' or 'none'. not sure if that means it's a problem with freetype rather than the font. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): freetype-2.3.9-3.fc11.i586 dejavu-sans-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch How reproducible: always. Steps to Reproduce: 1.install fedora 2.in firstboot go to date&time screen 3.watch the time ticking and observe text layout alternatively log in and enable seconds display and 12 hour mode on the panel clock and watch that. Actual results: layout 'jiggles' as numbers change. Expected results: no jiggling. Additional info: i think this has been like this for a year at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 491962] New: [ghostscript-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ghostscript-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491962 Summary: [ghostscript-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ghostscript-fonts AssignedTo: twaugh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: twaugh(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 491961] New: [fonts-KOI8-R] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [fonts-KOI8-R] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491961 Summary: [fonts-KOI8-R] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fonts-KOI8-R AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 490830] New: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 Summary: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: nafees-web-naskh-fonts AssignedTo: mathieu.bridon(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: johnp(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, mathieu.bridon(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Nafees Web Naksha when installed shows only Nafees as font name in font selection box. When other Nafees fonts installed manually all will point to same name Nafees in font selection dialog box.This should not happen and should show all font names from Nafees font family Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.0-5.fc11.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install this font 2. open this font in fontforge 3. check TTFNames in FontInfo(Ctrl+Shift+F) 4. Look for Preferred Family and Family fields. Actual results: currently it shows font name as Nafees Expected results: Should show font name as Nafees Web Naksha Additional info: Thanks to Muhammad Saad who reported this on fedora-i18n channel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Bug 478332] New: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478332 Summary: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: urw-fonts AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: besfahbo(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Apparently glyph 227 (or maybe 226 according to fontforge) of /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022024l.pfb has a width of 740 while all the other glyphs in the font have width 600. This causes fontconfig to mark the font as proportional instead of monospace. That then is causing other issues: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17493 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 474514] New: file conflict on upgrading
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jun '10

26 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file conflict on upgrading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474514 Summary: file conflict on upgrading Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: dejavu-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-BoldOblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Oblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-BoldItalic.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Italic.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-BoldItalic.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): # rpm -qa | grep dejavu dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 477486] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 May '10

29 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
52
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs July 2009